Resolving the Threat of Ambiguity by Defining a Threat to Violate the Fourth Amendment under Kentucky v. King.
- Published in:
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1487
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "KENTUCKY v. King (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 7
1
2
SUBJECTIVE INTENT AND THE POLICE-CREATED EXIGENCY DOCTRINE: THE LAWLESSNESS OF THE LAWFULNESS TEST.
- Published in:
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2013, v. 51, n. 3, p. 591
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Kentucky v. King : the police do not create exigent circumstances by lawfully knocking on the door to a home and announcing ‘police’.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2011, v. 24, n. 4, p. 329, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2011.625695
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Supreme Court 2010 point–counterpoint: Kentucky v. King : the Supreme Court invites unwarranted police entry.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2011, v. 24, n. 4, p. 321, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2011.625693
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
KENTUCKY V. KING: THE ONE WHERE THE SUPREME COURT DISHONORS THE WARRANT REQUIREMENT IN DRUG CASES.
- Published in:
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 5, p. 1269
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
KNOCK AND TALK NO MORE.
- Published in:
- Maine Law Review, 2014, v. 67, n. 1, p. 25
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Got a Warrant?: Breaking Bad and the Fourth Amendment.
- Published in:
- Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2015, v. 13, n. 1, p. 191
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article