Works matching DE "JUROR bias"
1
- Indiana Law Journal, 2014, v. 89, n. 2, p. 911
- Article
2
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2011, v. 14, n. 2, p. 537
- Article
3
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2013, v. 20, n. 5, p. 781, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2012.736283
- Clark, JohnW.;
- Cramer, RobertJ.;
- Percosky, Amy;
- Rufino, KatrinaA.;
- Miller, RowlandS.;
- Johnson, SharaM.
- Article
4
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2013, v. 20, n. 2, p. 188, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2011.633330
- Maeder, EvelynM.;
- Burdett, Joel
- Article
5
- Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2017, v. 15, n. 3, p. 270, doi. 10.1080/15377938.2017.1347542
- Yamamoto, Susan;
- Maeder, Evelyn M.
- Article
6
- Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2016, v. 14, n. 3, p. 195, doi. 10.1080/15377938.2016.1187233
- Ross, Stephen J.;
- Morera, Osvaldo F.
- Article
7
- William & Mary Law Review, 2020, v. 61, n. 6, p. 1759
- Article
8
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 5, p. 1859
- Article
10
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 4, p. 869
- YOKUM, DAVID;
- ROBERTSON, CHRISTOPHER T.;
- PALMER, MATT
- Article
11
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 95, n. 3, p. 809
- Article
12
- Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2015, v. 29, n. 5, p. 713, doi. 10.1002/acp.3155
- Estrada ‐ Reynolds, Victoria C.;
- Gray, Jennifer M.;
- Nuñez, Narina
- Article
13
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2023, v. 54, n. 3, p. 421
- Article
14
- North Carolina Law Review, 2013, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1555
- Article
15
- Legal Studies, 2016, v. 36, n. 2, p. 179, doi. 10.1111/lest.12098
- Article
16
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 2, p. 513
- LEVINSON, JUSTIN D.;
- SMITH, ROBERT J.;
- YOUNG, DANIELLE M.
- Article
17
- George Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 2, p. 448
- Article
18
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2021, v. 72, n. 2, p. 463
- Article
19
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1423
- Article
20
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2019, v. 60, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
21
- Marquette Law Review, 2013, v. 96, n. 3, p. 953
- Article
22
- Texas Law Review, 2014, v. 93, n. 1, p. 257
- Article
23
- Yale Law & Policy Review, 2021, v. 39, n. 2, p. 614
- Article
24
- Yale Law Journal, 2015, v. 124, n. 5, p. 1690
- Article
25
- Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 2018, v. 23, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.24839/2325-7342.JN23.1.51
- Kramer, Allison;
- Van Volkom, Michele
- Article
26
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2012, v. 18, n. 9, p. 817, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2011.566872
- Article
27
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2012, v. 18, n. 9, p. 797, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2011.561800
- Article
28
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 85, n. 3, p. 575
- Article
29
- Political Research Quarterly, 2023, v. 76, n. 1, p. 418, doi. 10.1177/10659129221094877
- Article
30
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2014, v. 44, n. 4, p. 303, doi. 10.1111/jasp.12222
- Skorinko, Jeanine L.;
- Laurent, Sean;
- Bountress, Kaitlin;
- Nyein, Kyi Phyu;
- Kuckuck, Daniel
- Article
31
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2004, v. 34, n. 10, p. 2069, doi. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02691.x
- Devine, Dennis J.;
- Olafson, Kristi M.;
- Jarvis, Larita L.;
- Bott, Jennifer P.;
- Clayton, Laura D.;
- Wolfe, Jami M. T.
- Article
32
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2018, v. 24, n. 1, p. 153
- Article
33
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2017, v. 23, n. 1/2, p. 189
- Article
34
- Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 2014, v. 21, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
36
- Oregon Law Review, 2023, v. 102, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
37
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2018, v. 27, p. 33
- Article
38
- New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 2015, v. 18, n. 3, p. 681
- Article
39
- New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 2015, v. 18, n. 3, p. 659
- Article
40
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 2012, v. 21, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2012.699252
- Article
41
- Law & Psychology Review, 2013, v. 37, p. 229
- Article
42
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2023, v. 37, p. 634
- Article
43
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2014, v. 32, n. 6, p. 789, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2147
- Bottoms, Bette L.;
- Peter‐Hagene, Liana C.;
- Stevenson, Margaret C.;
- Wiley, Tisha R. A.;
- Mitchell, Tracey Schneider;
- Goodman, Gail S.
- Article
44
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2014, v. 32, n. 6, p. 846, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2152
- Johnson, Jonni L.;
- Shelley, Alexandra E.
- Article
45
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2014, v. 32, n. 6, p. 813, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2153
- Cooper, Alexia;
- Quas, Jodi A.;
- Cleveland, Kyndra C.
- Article
46
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2011, v. 29, n. 4, p. 499, doi. 10.1002/bsl.985
- Shuman, Daniel W.;
- Stokes, Lynne;
- Martinez, George
- Article
47
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2011, v. 29, n. 3, p. 395, doi. 10.1002/bsl.969
- Reichert, Jenny;
- Miller, Monica K.;
- Bornstein, Brian H.;
- Shelton, Hon. Donald E.
- Article
48
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2019, v. 80, n. 3, p. 709, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2019.634
- Article
49
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2024, v. 77, n. 3, p. 583
- Article
50
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2015, v. 39, n. 1, p. 131
- Article