Works matching DE "JUDICIAL recusal"

Results: 91

Reversal by Recusal? Comer v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc. and the Need for Mandatory Judicial Recusal Statements.

Published in:

University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2015, v. 13, n. 2, p. 177

By:

WOODS, PATRICK A.

Publication type:

Article

JUDICIAL RECUSAL - PRINCIPLES, PROCESS AND PROBLEMS.

Published in:

2011

By:

Olivier, Morné

Publication type:

Book Review

THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG: A SURVEY OF THE PHILOSOPHY AND PRACTICE OF CANADIAN PROVINCIAL AND TERRITORIAL JUDGES CONCERNING JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION.

Published in:

Alberta Law Review, 2011, v. 48, n. 3, p. 569, doi. 10.29173/alr144

By:

BRYDEN, PHILIP;
HUGHES, JULA

Publication type:

Article

DECIDING RECUSAL MOTIONS: WHO JUDGES THE JUDGES?

Published in:

Valparaiso University Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1085

By:

ABRAMSON, LESLIE W.

Publication type:

Article

INTRODUCTION TO LESLIE W. ABRAMSON'S ARTICLE, DECIDING RECUSAL MOTIONS: WHO JUDGES THE JUDGES?

Published in:

Valparaiso University Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1083

By:

Cleveland, David R.

Publication type:

Article

RESHAPING RECUSAL PROCEDURES: ELIMINATING DECISIONMAKER BIAS AND PROMOTING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE.

Published in:

Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 807

By:

Marbes, Melinda A.

Publication type:

Article

THE SUPREME COURT AND RECUSALS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR LUBET.

Published in:

2013

By:

Rigertas, Laurel A.

Publication type:

Essay

SUPREME COURT LEAKS AND RECUSALS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR STEVEN LUBET'S SCOTUS ETHICS IN THE WAKE OF NFIB V. SEBELIUS.

Published in:

Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 925

By:

Hopkins, Kevin

Publication type:

Article

LAW AND DISCRETION IN SUPREME COURT RECUSALS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR LUBET.

Published in:

Valparaiso University Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 907

By:

Sullivan, Barry

Publication type:

Article

JUDICIAL RECUSAL: IT'S TIME TO TAKE ANOTHER LOOK POST - CAPERTON.

Published in:

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 63

By:

Brown, Justice Robert L.

Publication type:

Article

JUDICIAL RECUSAL IN NEW ZEALAND: LOOKING TO PROCEDURE AS THE PRINCIPLED WAY FORWARD.

Published in:

Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2015, v. 46, n. 2, p. 415

By:

Gajanayaka, Chamika

Publication type:

Article

REINING IN RECUSALS.

Published in:

Wisconsin Law Review, 2023, v. 2023, n. 6, p. 1821, doi. 10.59015/wlr.AXOB9070

By:

VAN ORSDOL, JUSTIN C.

Publication type:

Article

STEP ONE TO RECUSAL REFORM: FIND AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE RULE OF NECESSITY.

Published in:

Wisconsin Law Review, 2019, v. 2019, n. 3, p. 623

By:

CROY, SKYLAR REESE

Publication type:

Article

THE (UN)CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SUPREME COURT RECUSAL STANDARDS.

Published in:

Wisconsin Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 6, p. 1181

By:

Virelli, Louis J

Publication type:

Article

Nationality and the International Judge: The Nationalist Presumption Governing the International Judiciary and Why it Must Be Reversed.

Published in:

Cornell International Law Journal, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 77

By:

Dannenbaum, Tom

Publication type:

Article

Reciprocity, Denial, and the Appearance of Impropriety: Why Self-Recusal Cannot Remedy the Influence of Campaign Contributions on Judges' Decisions.

Published in:

2011

By:

Susman, Thomas M.

Publication type:

Essay

RECUSAL, GOVERNMENT ETHICS, AND SUPERANNUATED CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY.

Published in:

2012

By:

SWISHER, KEITH

Publication type:

Essay

HOW HIGH IS TOO HIGH?: JUDICIAL ELECTIONS AND RECUSAL AFTER CAPERTON.

Published in:

Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2010, v. 15, n. 1, p. 247

By:

Betts, Daniel

Publication type:

Article

THE FAILURE OF JUDICIAL RECUSAL AND DISCLOSURE RULES: EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT.

Published in:

Northwestern University Law Review, 2023, v. 117, n. 5, p. 1277

By:

Thorley, Dane

Publication type:

Article

Pride and prejudice: a case for reform of judicial recusal procedure.

Published in:

Legal Ethics, 2017, v. 20, n. 1, p. 89, doi. 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1261521

By:

Appleby, Gabrielle;
McDonald, Stephen

Publication type:

Article

Tobacco, Recusals, and Sexual Assault Reforms: Correspondent's report from Australia.

Published in:

Legal Ethics, 2011, v. 14, n. 1, p. 140, doi. 10.5235/146072811796372998

By:

Haller, Linda

Publication type:

Article

Judicial Recusal, Spouses and Health Care Reforms: Correspondent's Report from the USA.

Published in:

Legal Ethics, 2011, v. 14, n. 1, p. 138, doi. 10.5235/146072811796372989

By:

Steele, John

Publication type:

Article

Replacement Justice on the United States Supreme Court: The Use of Temporary Justices to Resolve the Recusal Conundrum.

Published in:

University of San Francisco Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 215

By:

schubert, Noah M.

Publication type:

Article

Caperton, Due Process, and Judicial Duty: Recusal Oversight in Patrons' Cases.

Published in:

2011

By:

Sheppard, Steve

Publication type:

Essay

Judicial Administration and Evaluation.

Published in:

Florida Bar Journal, 2012, v. 86, n. 6, p. 59

By:

Tramont Jr., Andrew V.

Publication type:

Article

Don't Let the Blindfold Slip: A Guide to Judicial Disqualification.

Published in:

Florida Bar Journal, 2012, v. 86, n. 4, p. 8

By:

Lippincott, Marcia K.

Publication type:

Article

The Institutional Politics of Federal Judicial Conduct Regulation.

Published in:

Yale Law & Policy Review, 2012, v. 31, n. 1, p. 33

By:

Remus, Dana A.

Publication type:

Article

RECOVERING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY: TOWARD A DUTY-FOCUSED DISQUALIFICATION JURISPRUDENCE BASED ON JEWISH LAW.

Published in:

Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2011, v. 39, n. 2, p. 511

By:

Pill, Shlomo

Publication type:

Article

Judicial Recusal: Principles, Process and Problems.

Published in:

2011

By:

LEE, H. P.

Publication type:

Book Review

RECUSAL IN ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION.

Published in:

Arizona Law Review, 2022, v. 64, n. 1, p. 135

By:

Virelli III, Louis J.

Publication type:

Article

REFOCUSING RECUSALS: HOW THE BIAS BLIND SPOT AFFECTS DISQUALIFICATION DISPUTES AND SHOULD RESHAPE RECUSAL REFORM.

Published in:

St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2013, v. 32, n. 2, p. 235

By:

MARBES, MELINDA A.

Publication type:

Article

FOREWORD.

Published in:

St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2013, v. 32, n. 2, p. 231

By:

SKRABACZ, JONATHAN E.;
MCCLURE-HARTMAN, LINDSAY L.

Publication type:

Article

IF IT'S NOT BROKE, DON'T FIX IT: IGNORING CRITICISMS OF SUPREME COURT RECUSALS.

Published in:

St. Louis University Law Journal, 2013, v. 57, n. 2, p. 521

By:

HENKE, KRISTEN L.

Publication type:

Article

Non-Judicial Recusals in Rhode Island: Empirical Evidence and Suggestions for Reform.

Published in:

Roger Williams University Law Review, 2024, v. 29, n. 4, p. 635

By:

Cheit, Ross E.;
Lang-Maso, Rose

Publication type:

Article

Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality.

Published in:

San Diego Law Review, 2010, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1

By:

Stempel, Jeffrey W.

Publication type:

Article

The Elusive Goal of Impartiality.

Published in:

Iowa Law Review, 2011, v. 97, n. 1, p. 180

By:

Bassett, Debra Lyn;
Perschbacher, Rex R.

Publication type:

Article

The Theory of Judicial Impartiality and the Case of Republic v Chief Justice Sereno.

Published in:

Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2019, v. 19, n. 2, p. 1

By:

Fernandez, Gemmo Bautista

Publication type:

Article

A Second Sitting: Assessing the Constitutionality and Desirability of Allowing Retired Supreme Court Justices to Fill Recusal-Based Vacancies on the Bench.

Published in:

Penn State Law Review, 2011, v. 116, n. 1, p. 253

By:

Saidman-Krauss, Rebekah

Publication type:

Article

COMING AT THE KING: A SUMMARY OF THE 2021 AND 2022 AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES GOVERNING RECUSAL OF JUDGES IN LOUISIANA’S CIVIL DISTRICT COURTS.

Published in:

Loyola Law Review, 2023, v. 69, n. 2, p. 471

By:

Brett, Taylor E.

Publication type:

Article

RECONSIDERING RECUSALS: THE NEED FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEN NOT TO RECUSE.

Published in:

Loyola Law Review, 2013, v. 59, n. 4, p. 947

By:

Lowe, Mason E.

Publication type:

Article

JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION ON APPEAL.

Published in:

Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 573

By:

Burke Robertson, Cassandra;
Hilbert, Gregory

Publication type:

Article

REWRITING JUDICIAL RECUSAL RULES WITH BIG DATA.

Published in:

Utah Law Review, 2020, n. 2, p. 383

By:

McKoski, Raymond J.

Publication type:

Article

REWRITING JUDICIAL RECUSAL RULES WITH BIG DATA.

Published in:

Utah Law Review, 2020, v. 2020, n. 2, p. 383

By:

McKoski, Raymond J.

Publication type:

Article

Congress, the Constitution, and Supreme Court Recusal.

Published in:

Washington & Lee Law Review, 2012, v. 69, n. 3, p. 1535

By:

Virelli, Louis J.

Publication type:

Article

The Trial of Maude Moore.

Published in:

Tennessee Bar Journal, 2010, v. 46, n. 9, p. 30

By:

Paine, Donald F.

Publication type:

Article

Deciding Not to Decide: The Politics of Recusals on the U. S. Supreme Court.

Published in:

Law & Society Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 621, doi. 10.1111/lasr.12090

By:

Hume, Robert J.

Publication type:

Article

CATHOLIC JUDGES HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO RECUSE THEMSELVES IN CAPITAL CASES.

Published in:

Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 1, p. 309

By:

Proctor, Ryan M.

Publication type:

Article

The New (and Improved) Judicial Recusal Law.

Published in:

Alabama Lawyer, 2014, v. 75, n. 6, p. 362

By:

Norman, Keith B.

Publication type:

Article

IMPORTANT NOTICES.

Published in:: Alabama Lawyer, 2014, v. 75, n. 4, p. 226
Publication type:: Article

LET THE SUN SHINE IN: A JUDICIALLY IMPLIED TIMELINESS REQUIREMENT CREATES A MURKY STANDARD FOR FEDERAL JUDGES AND LITIGANTS AND PERPETUATES AN APPEARANCE OF BIAS IN THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY.

Published in:

Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2015, v. 40, n. 3, p. 597

By:

Payne, Emma J.

Publication type:

Article