Works matching DE "INVENTION laws"

Results: 115

STEMMING THE TIDE: ON THE PATENTABILITY OF STEM CELLS AND DIFFERENTIATION PROCESSES.

Published in:

New York University Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 2, p. 551

By:

Morad, Leeron

Publication type:

Article

TABOO, THE GAME: PATENT OFFICE EDITION--THE NEW PREISSUANCE SUBMISSIONS UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT.

Published in:

Duke Law Journal, 2013, v. 63, n. 1, p. 245

By:

TRZECIAK, ALEXANDER R.

Publication type:

Article

PATENTS AND THE UNIVERSITY.

Published in:

Duke Law Journal, 2013, v. 63, n. 1, p. 1

By:

LEE, PETER

Publication type:

Article

LEGISLATION.

Published in:: BioScience, 1967, v. 17, n. 1, p. 45
Publication type:: Article

INNOVATION WORTH SHARING: SEEKING BALANCE BETWEEN INNOVATION POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY.

Published in:

Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 2, p. 413

By:

Katich, Alexandra H.

Publication type:

Article

PATENT ANTICIPATION AND OBVIOUSNESS AS POSSESSION.

Published in:

Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 4, p. 987

By:

Holbrook, Timothy R.

Publication type:

Article

ANYTHING UNDER THE SUN MADE BY HUMANS: PATENT LAW DOCTRINES AS ENDOGENOUS INSTITUTIONS FOR COMMERCIALIZING INNOVATION.

Published in:

2013

By:

Daily, James E.;
Scott Kieff, F.

Publication type:

Essay

TERRITORIALITY AND TANGIBILITY AFTER TRANSOCEAN.

Published in:

2012

By:

Holbrook, Timothy R.

Publication type:

Essay

Patentability and Inventorship of AI-Generated Inventions.

Published in:

Washburn Law Journal, 2021, v. 60, n. 3, p. 561

By:

Schwein, Rachel L.

Publication type:

Article

Machine Inventions.

Published in:

Washburn Law Journal, 2021, v. 60, n. 3, p. 423

By:

Gaudry, Kate

Publication type:

Article

Do You Want Innovation and Jobs? Repeal § 511.

Published in:

Washburn Law Journal, 2018, v. 57, n. 3, p. 431

By:

Black, Stephen T.

Publication type:

Article

PATENT BOUNDARIES.

Published in:

Temple Law Review, 2015, v. 87, n. 3, p. 501

By:

Winston, Elizabeth I.

Publication type:

Article

Ensuring That Your Nanotechnology Invention Is Properly Disclosed and Claimed.

Published in:

Nanotechnology Law & Business, 2010, v. 7, n. 3, p. 239

By:

Klock, Brian L.;
Boeshore, Seth E.

Publication type:

Article

RELUCTANCE REALISED? EMERGING PROBLEMS WITH S 117(2)(B) OF THE PATENTS ACT 1990 (CTH).

Published in:

Monash University Law Review, 2015, v. 41, n. 1, p. 163

By:

LIDDICOAT, JOHNATHON E.

Publication type:

Article

IMPLIED TERMS IN AUSTRALIAN CONTRACT LAW: A REAPPRAISAL AFTER UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA v GRAY.

Published in:

Monash University Law Review, 2011, v. 37, n. 2, p. 145

By:

KNOWLER, JANE;
RICKETT, CHARLES

Publication type:

Article

REINVENTING COPYRIGHT AND PATENT.

Published in:

Michigan Law Review, 2014, v. 113, n. 2, p. 231

By:

Bell, Abraham;
Parchomovsky, Gideon

Publication type:

Article

(A)rising Above the Well-Pleaded Complaint: A Proposal to Reconsider the Jurisdictional Analysis of the Federal Circuit After the America Invents Act.

Published in:

George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 686

By:

Glick, Kolya

Publication type:

Article

(A)rising Above the Well-Pleaded Complaint: A Proposal to Reconsider the Jurisdictional Analysis of the Federal Circuit After the America Invents Act.

Published in:

George Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 2, p. 686

By:

Click, Kolya

Publication type:

Article

Debugging Software's Schemas.

Published in:

2014

By:

Osenga, Kristen

Publication type:

Essay

PATENTS, DISCLOSURE, AND BIOPIRACY.

Published in:

Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 535

By:

GEBRU, AMAN

Publication type:

Article

COPING WITH THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT: PATENT CHALLENGES FOR STARTUP COMPANIES.

Published in:

Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal, 2013, v. 8, n. 2, p. 355

By:

CAMPBELL, PATRICIA E.

Publication type:

Article

AMERICA INVENTS ACT: FIRST-TO-FILE AND A RACE TO THE PATENT OFFICE.

Published in:

Entrepreneurial Business Law Journal, 2013, v. 8, n. 1, p. 47

By:

BRAUN, RICHARD G.

Publication type:

Article

Analysis of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act.

Published in:

BioProcessing Journal, 2011, v. 10, n. 2, p. 4, doi. 10.12665/J102.Luckow

By:

Luckow, Verne A.

Publication type:

Article

DRUGS, PATENTS, AND WELL-BEING.

Published in:

Washington University Law Review, 2021, v. 98, n. 5, p. 1403

By:

BUCCAFUSCO, CHRISTOPHER;
MASUR, JONATHAN S.

Publication type:

Article

TAKING A SLICE OF THE PIE: AN EMPIRICAL AND THEORETICAL INQUIRY ON ALLEGEDLY CHALLENGEABLE INVENTORSHIPS.

Published in:

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2020, v. 61, n. 1, p. 184

By:

CLAIRE WAN-CHIUNG CHENG;
JEFFREY WU

Publication type:

Article

The Fruits of the Convoluted Road to Patent Reform: The New Invalidity Proceedings of the Patent and Trademark Office.

Published in:

2012

By:

Kushan, Jeffrey P.

Publication type:

Essay

LIMITELE DREPTULUI DE EXPLOATARE CONFERIT DE BREVETUL DE INVENȚIE PRIN PRISMA ART. 102 DIN TRATATUL PRIVIND FUNCȚIONAREA UNIUNII EUROPENE.

Published in:

Romanian Journal of Intellectual Property Law / Revista Română de Dreptul Proprietăţii Intelectuale, 2015, n. 2, p. 50

By:

Gheorghiu, Gheorghe;
Lisnic, Irina

Publication type:

Article

Now that's patented protection.

Published in:: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 1995, v. 51, n. 1, p. 7
Publication type:: Article

INVENTING AROUND COPYRIGHT.

Published in:

2015

By:

Burk, Dan L.

Publication type:

Essay

THE LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION PROBLEM IN PATENT LAW.

Published in:

Northwestern University Law Review, 2011, v. 105, n. 3, p. 1097

By:

Tun-Jen Chiang

Publication type:

Article

Assessing inventive step of a combination pharmaceutical product.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2015, v. 10, n. 2, p. 74, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu233

By:

Ali, Suleman

Publication type:

Article

Italy: the exercise of the employer's statutory right of first refusal on the inventions of the employee.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2015, v. 10, n. 2, p. 87, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu236

By:

Giannino, Michele

Publication type:

Article

Vehicle Navigation System*.

Published in:: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 3, p. 239, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt254
Publication type:: Article

Third-party submissions for patent applications pending before the USPTO.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 11, p. 828, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt160

By:

Wagner, James J. D.;
Wu, Betty

Publication type:

Article

2014 —The perfect IP storm?

Published in:

2013

By:

Grassie, Gill

Publication type:

Editorial

First-to-file and first-to-invent priority: an American historical perspective.

Published in:

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jps216

By:

Macedo, Charles R.

Publication type:

Article

THE SUPREME COURT AND § 101 JURISPRUDENCE: RECONCILING SUBJECT-MATTER PATENTABILITY STANDARDS AND THE ABSTRACT IDEA EXCEPTION.

Published in:

University of Illinois Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 2, p. 629

By:

ROUX, JEREMY D .

Publication type:

Article

SECRET INVENTIONS.

Published in:

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 2, p. 917

By:

Anderson, J. Jonas

Publication type:

Article

IN RE CURTIS 354 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

Published in:: Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 177
Publication type:: Article

Progressive IP Reform in the Middle Kingdom: An Overview of the Past, Present, and Future of Chinese Intellectual Property Law.

Published in:

International Lawyer, 2012, v. 46, n. 3, p. 893

By:

MAGUIRE, JENNIFER WAI-SHING

Publication type:

Article

Method Patent Exceptionalism.

Published in:

Iowa Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 3, p. 1001

By:

Holbrook, Timothy R.

Publication type:

Article

Inter Partes Review: Ensuring Effective Patent Litigation Through Estoppel.

Published in:

Minnesota Law Review, 2015, v. 99, n. 5, p. 1975

By:

Motl, Ann E.

Publication type:

Article

Unpacking Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs).

Published in:

Minnesota Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 2/3, p. 649

By:

Cotropia, Christopher A.;
Kesan, Jay P.;
Schwartzt, David L.

Publication type:

Article

The Presumption of Patentability.

Published in:

Minnesota Law Review, 2013, v. 97, n. 3, p. 990

By:

Seymore, Sean B.

Publication type:

Article

Artificial Intelligence and Patent Ownership.

Published in:

Washington & Lee Law Review, 2018, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1945

By:

Schuster, W. Michael

Publication type:

Article

Taking Patents.

Published in:

Washington & Lee Law Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 2, p. 719

By:

Dolin, Gregory;
Manta, Irina D.

Publication type:

Article

The Changing Guard of Patent Law: Chevron Deference for the PTO.

Published in:

William & Mary Law Review, 2013, v. 55, n. 1, p. 1958

By:

Wasserman, Melissa F.

Publication type:

Article

Too big to pay: employee-inventor remuneration.

Published in:

Chemistry in New Zealand (Christchurch), 2018, v. 82, n. 2, p. 92

By:

Grant, Stephanie

Publication type:

Article

Protection of the Inventor Outside the Patent System.

Published in:

California Law Review, 1955, v. 43, n. 3, p. 457, doi. 10.2307/3478108

By:

Dunlavey, Dean C.

Publication type:

Article

CONSTRUING PATENT CLAIMS IN LIGHT OF THE SPECIFICATION VERSUS IMPORTING CLAIM LIMITATIONS FROM THE SPECIFICATION: Is THERE ANY DIFFERENCE?

Published in:

Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 2010, v. 4, n. 1, p. 119

By:

Harmer, Rob

Publication type:

Article