Works matching DE "INTERSTATE commerce clause"
1
- George Washington Law Review, 2025, v. 93, n. 2, p. 410
- Article
2
- Indiana Law Journal, 2018, v. 93, n. 3, p. 653
- Article
3
- Indiana Law Journal, 2016, v. 92, n. 1, p. 365
- Article
4
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2011, v. 35, n. 2, p. 375
- Article
5
- Financial Executive, 2012, v. 28, n. 8, p. 68
- BARTEK, JAMES;
- LIPPMAN, MICHAEL;
- PRITCHARD, JENNIFER
- Article
6
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1419
- Article
7
- Review of Litigation, 2015, v. 34, n. 3, p. 423
- Article
8
- Emory Law Journal, 2021, v. 71, n. 1, p. 107
- Article
9
- Emory Law Journal, 2017, v. 66, n. 4, p. 885
- Article
11
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 723
- Article
12
- Environmental Law (Lewis & Clark Law School), 2019, v. 49, n. 3, p. 703
- Article
14
- Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 2013, v. 31, n. 1, p. 168
- Article
15
- William & Mary Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 6, p. 2107
- Article
16
- William & Mary Law Review, 2019, v. 60, n. 4, p. 1335
- Article
17
- William & Mary Law Review, 2016, v. 57, n. 6, p. 1985
- Article
18
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 5, p. 1745
- Article
19
- Public Land & Resources Law Review, 2017, v. 38, p. 187
- Article
20
- Southwestern Historical Quarterly, 2023, v. 126, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.1353/swh.2023.0006
- Article
21
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 4, p. 827
- Article
22
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
23
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2014, v. 29, n. 4, p. 517
- Article
24
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2020, v. 45, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1353/sch.2020.0018
- Article
25
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2020, v. 45, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1353/sch.2020.0017
- Article
26
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2017, v. 42, n. 1, p. 49, doi. 10.1353/sch.2017.0022
- Article
27
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 133, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0012
- Article
28
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2013, v. 38, n. 3, p. 281, doi. 10.1353/sch.2013.0001
- Article
29
- California Law Review, 2021, v. 109, n. 3, p. 733, doi. 10.15779/Z38TH8BN83
- Klass, Alexandra B.;
- Pai, Shantal
- Article
30
- California Law Review, 2015, v. 103, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
31
- Southwestern Law Review, 2016, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
32
- Southwestern Law Review, 2012, v. 41, n. 4, p. 617
- Article
33
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 1, p. 221
- Article
35
- American Journal of Legal History, 2015, v. 55, n. 4, p. 361
- Article
36
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2013, v. 17, n. 2, p. 204
- Article
37
- Vermont Law Review, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. 341
- Kimbrell, George A.;
- Paulsen, Aurora L.
- Article
39
- North Carolina Law Review, 2020, v. 98, n. 6, p. 1447
- Article
40
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2014, v. 54, n. 3, p. 351
- Article
41
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2014, v. 54, n. 3, p. 351
- Article
42
- Houston Law Review, 2016, v. 54, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
43
- Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy, 2024, v. 23, n. 2, p. 79
- Article
44
- Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2014, v. 40, n. 2, p. 156
- Article
45
- Creighton Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 3, p. 243
- Article
46
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2012, v. 160, n. 5, p. 1479
- Article
47
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2011, v. 159, n. 6, p. 1825
- Article
48
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1052
- Article
49
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 704
- Article
50
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 2, p. 512
- Article