Works matching DE "INTERPRETATION %26 construction of administrative law"
1
- St. John's Law Review, 2025, v. 98, n. 4, p. 825
- Article
2
- Public Contract Law Journal, 2020, v. 49, n. 3, p. 567
- Richards, Raymond;
- Terry, Justin;
- Hebdon, Chris;
- Villalta, Stephanie
- Article
3
- Legal Studies, 2024, v. 44, n. 2, p. 295, doi. 10.1017/lst.2023.32
- Article
4
- Creighton Law Review, 2024, v. 57, n. 2, p. 427
- Article
5
- Cardozo Law Review, 2014, v. 36, n. 2, p. 499
- Article
6
- Minnesota Law Review, 2017, v. 101, n. 6, p. 2167
- Mulligan, Lumen N.;
- Staszewski, Glen
- Article
7
- Indiana Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 4, p. 969
- BABB, BRYAN H.;
- DICK, BRADLEY M.
- Article
8
- Journal of Environmental Law, 2009, v. 21, n. 2, p. 309, doi. 10.1093/jel/eqp015
- Tolsma, Hanna;
- de Graaf, Kars;
- Jans, Jan
- Article
9
- Journal of Environmental Law, 2007, v. 19, n. 2, p. 259, doi. 10.1093/jel/eqm005
- Article
10
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2024, v. 89, n. 3, p. 871
- Article
12
- Widener Law Review, 2021, v. 27, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
13
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 6, p. 1155
- Article
14
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2017, v. 32, n. 3, p. 277
- Article
15
- Constitutional Commentary, 2010, v. 27, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
16
- University of Toronto Law Journal, 2005, v. 55, n. 3, p. 535, doi. 10.1353/tlj.2005.0023
- Article
17
- University of Toronto Law Journal, 2005, v. 55, n. 3, p. 497, doi. 10.1353/tlj.2005.0019
- Article
18
- Tax Lawyer, 2013, v. 66, n. 3, p. 819
- Article
19
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2021, v. 78, n. 2, p. 925
- Article
20
- Stanford Law Review, 2024, v. 76, n. 6, p. 1381
- Article
21
- Public Administration Review, 2009, v. 69, n. 3, p. 518, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01997.x
- Article
22
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2008, n. 20, p. 74
- Caimoto Duarte, Joaquim;
- Luísa Varia, Tânia
- Article
23
- Journal of Marketing, 1959, v. 23, n. 4, p. 376, doi. 10.2307/1247406
- Article
24
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2021, v. 54, n. 4, p. 629
- Article
25
- Administrative Theory & Praxis (Taylor & Francis Ltd), 2009, v. 31, n. 4, p. 556, doi. 10.2753/ATP1084-1806310406
- Article
26
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2007, v. 101, n. 3, p. 997
- Article
27
- North Carolina Law Review, 2018, v. 97, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
28
- 2020
- Letter to the Editor
29
- Florida Bar Journal, 2020, v. 94, n. 1, p. 18
- Shepherd, Frank;
- Martínez, Roberto;
- Reaveley, Ben;
- Padgett, Savannah
- Article
30
- Swiss Political Science Review, 2009, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2009.tb00121.x
- SCHEDLER, KUNO;
- SCHMUCKI, LUKAS
- Article
31
- Virginia Law Review, 2023, v. 109, n. 5, p. 1009
- Deacon, Daniel T.;
- Litman, Leah M.
- Article
32
- Harvard Journal on Legislation, 2025, v. 62, n. 1, p. 19
- Article
33
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 65, n. 1, p. 47
- Knudsen, Sanne H.;
- Wildermuth, Amy J.
- Article
34
- Vniversitas, 2009, n. 119, p. 113
- Torres, Carlos Ariel Sánchez;
- Barrios, Francisco Ternera
- Article
35
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2004, v. 2, n. 2, p. 642, doi. 10.1093/jicj/2.2.642
- Article
36
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2014, v. 38, n. 2, p. 479
- Article
37
- Virginia Law Review, 2010, v. 96, n. 4, p. 887
- Article