Works matching DE "INTERNET domain name laws"
1
- Review of Litigation, 2003, v. 22, n. 1, p. 99
- Article
2
- Monash University Law Review, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 188
- LIPTON, JACQUELINE;
- WONG, MARY
- Article
3
- William & Mary Law Review, 2001, v. 43, n. 1, p. 141
- Helfer, Laurence R.;
- Dinwoodie, Graeme B.
- Article
4
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2012, v. 22, n. 2, p. 449
- Article
5
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2011, v. 21, n. 2, p. 283
- Article
6
- Sport Marketing Quarterly, 2001, v. 10, n. 4, p. 241
- Article
7
- Sport Marketing Quarterly, 2001, v. 10, n. 3, p. 173
- Article
8
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 3, p. 607
- Article
9
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2010, v. 25, n. 1, p. 465
- Article
10
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2004, v. 19, n. 1, p. 387
- Article
11
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2004, v. 19, n. 1, p. 263
- Article
12
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2003, v. 18, n. 1, p. 257
- Article
13
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2001, v. 16, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
14
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2001, v. 16, n. 1, p. 205
- Article
15
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2020, v. 43, n. 2, p. 197
- Article
16
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2010, v. 23, n. 2, p. 447
- Article
18
- Public Relations Tactics, 2008, v. 15, n. 8, p. 4
- Article
19
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2010, v. 19, n. 1, p. 530
- Article
20
- Chinese Law & Government, 2010, v. 43, n. 5, p. 45, doi. 10.2753/CLG0009-4609430507
- Ministry of Information Industry
- Article
21
- China Business Review, 2000, v. 27, n. 4, p. 34
- Article
22
- Business Lawyer, 2011, v. 67, n. 1, p. 361
- Article
23
- Business Lawyer, 2010, v. 66, n. 1, p. 221
- Godfread, Paul;
- Dorrain, Kristine
- Article
24
- Business Lawyer, 2010, v. 66, n. 1, p. 249
- Shorey, Linda J.;
- Holtzman, Anthony R.
- Article
25
- Business Lawyer, 2009, v. 65, n. 1, p. 251
- Godfread, Paul;
- Dorrain, Kristine
- Article
26
- TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 2005, v. 49, n. 3, p. 13, doi. 10.1007/BF02763639
- DuBoff, Leonard D.;
- King, Christy O.
- Article
27
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2009, n. 24, p. 129
- Article
28
- FICC Quarterly, 2000, v. 51, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
29
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 2, p. 99, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw200
- Article
30
- Mizan Law Review, 2014, v. 8, n. 2, p. 424, doi. 10.4314/mlr.v8i2.6
- Naumovski, Goce;
- Chapkanov, Dimitri
- Article
31
- Marmara University Journal of the Faculty of Economic & Administrative Sciences, 2010, v. 28, n. 1, p. 479
- Article
32
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 1, p. 137, doi. 10.15779/Z38599Z19K
- Article
33
- Duke Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
34
- International Journal of Law & Information Technology, 2018, v. 26, n. 4, p. 273, doi. 10.1093/ijlit/eay012
- Schwemer, Sebastian Felix
- Article
35
- International Journal of Law & Information Technology, 2010, v. 18, n. 3, p. 274, doi. 10.1093/ijlit/eaq007
- Article
36
- Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 2006, v. 11, n. 2, p. 191
- Article
37
- Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 2005, v. 10, n. 2, p. 337
- Article
38
- Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 2011, v. 49, p. 559
- Article
39
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 89, n. 6, p. 85
- Stein, Mark E.;
- Horowitz, Matthew N.
- Article
40
- Franchise Law Journal, 2015, v. 34, n. 4, p. 521
- Article
41
- Social Technologies / Socialines Technologijos, 2012, v. 2, n. 2, p. 366
- Kalinauskas, Marius;
- Barcys, Mantas
- Article
42
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2019, v. 80, n. 3, p. 661, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2019.631
- Article
43
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2000, v. 25, n. 3, p. 678
- Article
44
- CPA Journal, 2001, v. 71, n. 11, p. 62
- Warner, Paul D.;
- Smith, L. Murphy;
- Ruhnka, John C.;
- Bagby, John W.
- Article
45
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 3, p. 839
- Article
47
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2009, v. 14, n. 4, p. 368
- Article