Works matching DE "INTERNATIONAL copyright"
1
- Management Science, 2006, v. 52, n. 8, p. 1185, doi. 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0516
- Article
2
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 3, p. 631
- Article
3
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2006, v. 21, n. 1, p. 362
- Article
4
- ITNOW, 2013, v. 55, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1093/itnow/bws140
- Article
5
- George Washington International Law Review, 2011, v. 43, n. 4, p. 703
- Article
8
- Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2015, v. 18, n. 3/4, p. 150, doi. 10.1111/jwip.12036
- Prasad, Narayan;
- Aggarwal, Pravesh
- Article
9
- Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2014, v. 17, n. 1/2, p. 47, doi. 10.1002/jwip.12019
- Article
10
- Monash University Law Review, 2017, v. 43, n. 1, p. 274
- ELMAHJUB, EZIEDDIN;
- SUZOR, NICOLAS
- Article
11
- Monash University Law Review, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 60
- Article
12
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2008, v. 85, n. 2, p. 417, doi. 10.1177/107769900808500211
- Article
13
- Washington International Law Journal, 2015, v. 24, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
14
- American Economic Review, 1952, v. 42, n. 5, p. 876
- Article
15
- Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 2011, v. 12, n. 1, p. 123, doi. 10.2202/1565-3404.1265
- Article
16
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2015, v. 18, n. 1, p. 39
- Article
17
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2011, v. 14, n. 1, p. 187
- Article
18
- Houston Law Review, 2010, v. 47, n. 4, p. 1013
- Jaszi, Peter;
- Joyce, Craig;
- Leaffer, Marshall;
- Ochoa, Tyler
- Article
19
- Houston Law Review, 2010, v. 47, n. 4, p. 877
- Article
20
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2005, v. 28, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
21
- American Periodicals, 2000, v. 10, p. 79
- Article
22
- Fontes Artis Musicae, 2015, v. 62, n. 4, p. 327
- Article
24
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2012, v. 23, n. 1, p. 237
- Article
26
- Art, Antiquity & Law, 2008, v. 13, n. 2, p. 115
- Article
27
- Canadian Journal of Communication, 2011, v. 36, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.22230/cjc.2011v36n1a2321
- Article
28
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 1996, v. 5, n. 2, p. 95, doi. 10.1080/13600834.1996.9965738
- Article
30
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2007, v. 57, n. 4, p. 779
- Article
31
- Cambridge Quarterly, 2012, v. 41, n. 3, p. 318, doi. 10.1093/camqtly/bfs025
- Article
32
- Economics & Management, 2008, p. 498
- Duoba, Kęstutis;
- Žilinskas, Vytautas
- Article
33
- Pace Law Review, 2018, v. 39, n. 1, p. 361
- Article
34
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2015, v. 48, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
35
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 2009, v. 62, n. 3, p. 25
- Article
36
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2013, v. 18, n. 6, p. 566
- Neethu, R.;
- Shakeri, Zahra
- Article
37
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2012, v. 17, n. 1, p. 88
- Article
38
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2012, v. 17, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
39
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2010, v. 15, n. 5, p. 398
- Article
40
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2009, v. 14, n. 3, p. 274
- Article
41
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2007, v. 12, n. 2, p. 266
- Article
42
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2011, v. 68, n. 3, p. 1555
- Article
43
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2020, v. 44, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.52214/jla.v44i1.7308
- Article