Innovation Policy Pluralism.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2019, v. 128, n. 3, p. 544
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "INTELLECTUAL property policy"
Results: 105
1
2
OECD Discussion Draft on Special Considerations for Intangibles.
- Published in:
- Tax Executive, 2012, v. 64, n. 5, p. 373
- Publication type:
- Article
3
New Developments in U.S. Technology Policy: Implications for Competitiveness and International Trade Policy.
- Published in:
- California Management Review, 1989, v. 32, n. 1, p. 107, doi. 10.2307/41166737
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
REWARDING CREATIVITY THROUGH INTELLECUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.
- Published in:
- Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 2015, v. 24, n. 2, p. 247
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
The Tale of Three Cities—Da Nang, Nanjing, and Washington: Titanic Economic Shifts Across Asia-Pacific Economies.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
6
CLIMATE CHANGE, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND THE SCOPE OF HUMAN RIGHTS OBLIGATIONS.
- Published in:
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 2011, v. 11, n. 2, p. 58
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
A "MYRIAD" OF CONTROVERSY OVER THE QUESTION OF HUMAN GENE PATENT ELIGIBILITY: A COMPARISON OF THE DIFFERING APPROACHES IN THE UNITED STATES AND AUSTRALIA.
- Published in:
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2016, v. 38, n. 3, p. 913
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Japan first to ratify global manufacturing plan.
- Published in:
- Research Technology Management, 1994, v. 37, n. 5, p. 4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Competition and Intellectual Property Policies in the Indian Pharmaceutical Sector.
- Published in:
- Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 2017, v. 42, n. 2, p. 61, doi. 10.1177/0256090917704561
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Evidence-Based Intellectual Property Policymaking: An Integrated Review of Methods and Conclusions.
- Published in:
- Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2016, v. 19, n. 5/6, p. 150, doi. 10.1111/jwip.12069
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Conflicts in the Knowledge Society: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
12
Bold and newly Independent, or Isolated and Cast Adrift? The Implications of Brexit for Intellectual Property Law and Policy.
- Published in:
- Journal of Common Market Studies, 2017, v. 55, n. 6, p. 1306, doi. 10.1111/jcms.12550
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
USING SIGNAL THEORY TO DETERMINE NONOBVIOUSNESS OF INVENTIONS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2016, v. 23, n. 2, p. 241
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
TAONGA, RIGHTS AND INTERESTS: SOME OBSERVATIONS ON WAI 262 AND THE FRAMEWORK OF PROTECTIONS FOR THE MĀORI LANGUAGE.
- Published in:
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 2, p. 241
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
The externalization of domestic regulation.
- Published in:
- Science Communication, 1995, v. 17, n. 2, p. 137, doi. 10.1177/1075547095017002003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Madrid Protocol and Indian Trade Mark Law : a critical analysis.
- Published in:
- Clarion: International Multidisciplinary Journal, 2016, v. 5, n. 2, p. 48, doi. 10.5958/2277-937X.2016.00030.7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Communication and the constitution in cyberspace.
- Published in:
- Communication Education, 1994, v. 43, n. 2, p. 87, doi. 10.1080/03634529409378966
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Biden Urges New Rules for Commercial Engagement in Beijing Speech.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 2013, p. 2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
China Protects Integrated Circuit Designs.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 2001, v. 28, n. 6, p. 22
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
IPR Protection and Enforcement: A Guide.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 2000, v. 27, n. 6, p. 28
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
IP Rights Protection Will Improve in China--Eventually.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 2000, v. 27, n. 3, p. 22
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Battling weak IP protection in pharmaceuticals.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 1999, v. 26, n. 1, p. 22
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
China's IPR enforcement mechanisms.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 1999, v. 26, n. 1, p. 14
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
An IPR overhaul.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 1998, v. 25, n. 1, p. 38
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
US and China avert IPR-related trade sanctions.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 1996, v. 23, n. 4, p. 4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Recording your rights.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 1996, v. 23, n. 2, p. 30
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Onward and upward.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 1995, v. 22, n. 2, p. 6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
IPR watchdogs.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 1994, v. 21, n. 6, p. 16
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Taking a stand.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 1994, v. 21, n. 6, p. 9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Improving protection of intellectual property.
- Published in:
- China Business Review, 1992, v. 19, n. 2, p. 9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN INDIAN AGRICULTURE-A BANE OR BOON.
- Published in:
- VIDHIGYA: The Journal of Legal Awareness, 2014, v. 9, n. 1, p. 71
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Nepal’s first national IP policy, 2017: never too late.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 7, p. 550, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx093
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Innovation and intellectual property policies in European Research Infrastructure Consortia--Part I: The Case of the European Spallation Source ERIC.
- Published in:
- 2017
- Publication type:
- Correction Notice
34
Innovation and intellectual property policies in European Research Infrastructure Consortia--Part I: The Case of the European Spallation Source ERIC.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 5, p. 384, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx022
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Don't threat the small stuff--Reform coming for unjustified threats.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2016, v. 11, n. 5, p. 329, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw032
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Intellectual Property Policy: stay the course (mostly).
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 1, p. 48, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt210
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
IS THERE AN ANTICOMMONS TRAGEDY IN THE WORLD SMARTPHONE INDUSTRY?
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1527, doi. 10.15779/Z38F76670Q
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
THE "TRAGEDY OF THE ANTICOMMONS" FALLACY: A LAW AND ECONOMICS ANALYSIS OF PATENT THICKETS AND FRAND LICENSING.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1489, doi. 10.15779/Z38RR1PM7N
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
LITIGATION OF STANDARDS-ESSENTIAL PATENTS IN EUROPE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1457, doi. 10.15779/Z38RN30751
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
THE SMALLEST SALABLE PATENT-PRACTICING UNIT: OBSERVATIONS ON ITS ORIGINS, DEVELOPMENT, AND FUTURE.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1433, doi. 10.15779/Z38154DP3H
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
WHY INCENTIVES FOR "PATENT HOLDOUT" THREATEN TO DISMANTLE FRAND, AND WHY IT MATTERS.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1381, doi. 10.15779/Z38WD3Q19B
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
HAS THE ACADEMY LED PATENT LAW ASTRAY?
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1313, doi. 10.15779/Z388P5V91H
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
REGULATORY PRIORITIES GOVERNING STEM CELL RESEARCH IN CALIFORNIA: RELAXING REVENUE SHARING & SAFEGUARDING ACCESS PLANS.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2008, v. 23, n. 1, p. 219
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
IPRs, Technological Development, and Economic Development.
- Published in:
- Journal of Economic Issues, 2006, v. 40, n. 2, p. 333, doi. 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506911
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
FORUM.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
46
Loose coupling, conflict, and resistance: the case of IPR policy conflict in an Israeli university.
- Published in:
- Higher Education (00181560), 2017, v. 73, n. 5, p. 709, doi. 10.1007/s10734-016-9992-0
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
INTEGRATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN TOWARDS MULTILATERAL TRADING SYSTEM.
- Published in:
- Journal of Economic Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2014, v. 71, n. 2, p. 21
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
A Cheese by Any Other Name: A Palatable Compromise to the Conflict over Geographical Indications.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2006, v. 59, n. 3, p. 873
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
REFORMING THE PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: THE CASE OF CHINA AND TAIWAN IN LIGHT OF WTO ACCESSION.
- Published in:
- Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 2014, v. 2014, n. 3, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Ambiguity related to IPR and access to technology in Bt cotton seed and trait case.
- Published in:
- Current Science (00113891), 2016, v. 111, n. 11, p. 1745
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article