Works matching DE "IMPOSSIBILITY of performance"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2002, v. 100, n. 7, p. 1954, doi. 10.2307/1556081
- White, James J.;
- Peters, David A.
- Article
2
- Comparative Legal History, 2014, v. 2, n. 2, p. 278, doi. 10.5235/2049677X.2.2.278
- Article
3
- British Journal of Aesthetics, 2019, v. 59, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.1093/aesthj/ayy028
- Article
4
- Concentric: Literacy & Cultural Studies, 2009, v. 35, n. 2, p. 211
- Article
5
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 2, p. 347
- Article
6
- Econometrica, 2005, v. 73, n. 2, p. 517, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00587.x
- Article
7
- King's Law Journal, 2021, v. 32, n. 1, p. 60, doi. 10.1080/09615768.2021.1885328
- Article
8
- Villanova Law Review, 2007, v. 52, n. 5, p. 1071
- Article
9
- Regulation, 2024, v. 47, n. 3, p. 14
- Article
10
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2006, v. 26, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqi044
- Article
11
- Southern Law Journal, 2018, v. 28, n. 2, p. 177
- Article
12
- Strategic Finance, 2004, v. 85, n. 8, p. 46
- Article
13
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2021, v. 78, n. 3, p. 10
- Article
14
- Theory & Decision, 2004, v. 57, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1007/s11238-004-2631-8
- Article
15
- Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1982, v. 97, n. 4, p. 699, doi. 10.2307/1885107
- Article
16
- Liverpool Law Review, 2022, v. 43, n. 3, p. 501, doi. 10.1007/s10991-022-09294-7
- Article
17
- Liverpool Law Review, 2022, v. 43, n. 2, p. 263, doi. 10.1007/s10991-022-09305-7
- Peari, Sagi;
- Golestani, Zamir R.
- Article
18
- Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 2006, v. 24, n. 3, p. 423, doi. 10.1080/02646811.2006.11433445
- Article
19
- Business Studies / Poslovne Studje, 2017, v. 9, n. 17/18, p. 371, doi. 10.7251/POS1718371D
- Article
20
- Economica, 1976, v. 43, n. 169, p. 67, doi. 10.2307/2553017
- Article
21
- Economica, 1976, v. 43, n. 169, p. 59, doi. 10.2307/2553016
- Kemp, Murray C.;
- Yew-Kwang Ng
- Article
22
- Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara - International Journal of Engineering, 2011, v. 9, n. 3, p. 85
- NACHATAR, Jaspal Singh;
- HUSSIN, Abdul Aziz;
- OMRAN, Abdelnaser
- Article
23
- Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara - International Journal of Engineering, 2011, v. 9, n. 3, p. 69
- OMRAN, Abdelnaser;
- HUSSIN, Abdul Aziz
- Article
24
- ASHRAE Transactions, 2011, v. 117, n. 1, p. 466
- Article
25
- Synthese, 2009, v. 168, n. 1, p. 81, doi. 10.1007/s11229-008-9314-x
- Article
26
- Widener Law Review, 2010, v. 15, n. 2, p. 325
- Article
27
- Otago Law Review, 2006, v. 11, n. 2, p. 161
- Article
28
- Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 2014, v. 24, n. 2, p. 429, doi. 10.18060/18272
- Article
29
- Oregon Law Review, 2012, v. 91, n. 2, p. 325
- Article
30
- Review of Economic Studies, 1980, v. 47, n. 2, p. 441, doi. 10.2307/2297003
- Article
31
- Erasmus Law Review, 2014, v. 7, n. 2, p. 67, doi. 10.5553/elr.000018
- Article
32
- Construction Law International, 2014, v. 9, n. 2, p. 4
- Mewing, Andrew;
- Batch, Michael
- Article
33
- 2014
- Jacobs, Johannes;
- Poel, Ibo;
- Osseweijer, Patricia
- Letter
34
- Economic Theory, 2013, v. 54, n. 2, p. 249, doi. 10.1007/s00199-013-0750-6
- Man, Priscilla;
- Takayama, Shino
- Article
35
- Social Choice & Welfare, 2001, v. 18, n. 1, p. 107, doi. 10.1007/s003550000062
- Article
36
- Economic Inquiry, 1976, v. 14, n. 2, p. 297, doi. 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00397.x
- Article
37
- Revista de Derecho Privado (0123-4366), 2022, n. 42, p. 67, doi. 10.18601/01234366.n42.04
- Article
38
- Transnational Legal Theory, 2019, v. 10, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1080/20414005.2019.1609813
- Article
39
- Arbitration Journal, 1972, v. 27, n. 4, p. 291
- Article
40
- Jurisprudence / Jurisprudencija, 2009, v. 4, n. 118, p. 197
- Baranauskas, Egidijus;
- Zapolskis, Paulius
- Article