Do we need a uniform regulatory system for biobanks across Europe?
- Published in:
- European Journal of Human Genetics, 2006, v. 14, n. 2, p. 245, doi. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201530
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "HUMAN genetics laws"
Results: 21
1
2
Cockamamie state laws threaten genetic rights.
- Published in:
- Nature Medicine, 2012, v. 18, n. 4, p. 485, doi. 10.1038/nm0412-485
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Private matters, public affairs.
- Published in:
- Nature Genetics, 2000, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1038/79061
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Genetic Nondiscrimination Legislation Could Improve Cancer Prevention--If it Passes.
- Published in:
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007, v. 99, n. 13, p. 993, doi. 10.1093/jnci/djm058
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Privacy and Biobanking in China: A Case of Policy in Transition.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2015, v. 43, n. 4, p. 726, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12315
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
The Right Not to Know and the Duty to Tell: The Case of Relatives.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2014, v. 42, n. 1, p. 38, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12117
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Whither gene patenting and the patenting of diagnostic methods post- Mayo and Myriad ? The need for certainty in navigating the high seas of policy.
- Published in:
- Law, Innovation & Technology, 2016, v. 8, n. 2, p. 207, doi. 10.1080/17579961.2016.1250379
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Uncommon Genes, Unpatentable Subject Matter.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
9
In the News: Controlling genetic bias.
- Published in:
- Nature Reviews Genetics, 2004, v. 5, n. 7, p. 486, doi. 10.1038/nrg1391
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
The push towards common European legislation with respect to the right to know one's genetic origins.
- Published in:
- Medicina e Morale, 2017, v. 66, n. 6, p. 747
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act Of 2008: Potential Implications.
- Published in:
- Ethics & Critical Thinking Journal, 2012, v. 2012, n. 1, p. 116
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Business and Breakthrough: Framing (Expanded) Genetic Carrier Screening for the Public.
- Published in:
- Health Communication, 2017, v. 32, n. 9, p. 1051, doi. 10.1080/10410236.2016.1196515
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Exposomics: A Call for Research Investment.
- Published in:
- Public Health Ethics, 2014, v. 7, n. 3, p. 207, doi. 10.1093/phe/phu031
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Getting the Word out on GINA.
- Published in:
- AUANews, 2013, v. 18, n. 11, p. 8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
After GINA, NINA? Neuroscience-Based Discrimination in the Workplace.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2012, v. 65, n. 3, p. 933
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Who Owns Your Cells? A Theoretical Examination of Property Rights over Human Genetic Material.
- Published in:
- Te Mata Koi: Auckland University Law Review, 2017, v. 23, p. 269
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Genetic Exceptionalism & Legislative Pragmatism.
- Published in:
- Hastings Center Report, 2005, v. 35, n. 4, p. 27, doi. 10.2307/3528825
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
The Regulated Gene: New Legal Dilemmas.
- Published in:
- Medical Law Review, 2004, v. 12, n. 1, p. 2, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/12.1.2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
CLOSING THE GAP: PROTECTING PREDICTIVE NEUROSCIENCE INFORMATION FROM HEALTH INSURANCE DISCRIMINATION.
- Published in:
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 5, p. 1433
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
ENABLING RESPONSIBLE PUBLIC GENOMICS.
- Published in:
- Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 2010, v. 20, n. 2, p. 325
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
PRESERVING HUMAN POTENTIAL AS FREEDOM: A FRAMEWORK FOR REGULATING EPIGENETIC HARMS.
- Published in:
- Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 2010, v. 20, n. 2, p. 259
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article