Works matching DE "HISTORY of common law"
3
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2011, n. 29, p. 114
- Article
4
- History of European Ideas, 2015, v. 41, n. 8, p. 1080, doi. 10.1080/01916599.2015.1077152
- Article
5
- History of European Ideas, 2014, v. 40, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1080/01916599.2013.781852
- Article
6
- Gender & History, 2020, v. 32, n. 2, p. 447, doi. 10.1111/1468-0424.12481
- Article
9
- North Carolina Historical Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 4, p. 373
- Article
10
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 75, n. 1, p. 312
- Article
12
- History, 1996, v. 81, n. 264, p. 511, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-229X.1996.tb01692.x
- Article
13
- Economic History Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 3, p. 962, doi. 10.1111/ehr.12088
- Foreman‐Peck, James;
- Hannah, Leslie
- Article
14
- American Journal of Legal History, 2018, v. 58, n. 4, p. 535, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/njy020
- Article
15
- American Journal of Legal History, 2018, v. 58, n. 2, p. 208, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/njy003
- Johnson, Michelle;
- Oldham, James
- Article
16
- American Journal of Legal History, 2015, v. 55, n. 2, p. 149, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/55.2.149
- Article
17
- American Journal of Legal History, 2013, v. 53, n. 4, p. 478, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/53.4.478
- Article
19
- American Journal of Legal History, 2013, v. 53, n. 4, p. 393, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/53.4.393
- Article
21
- Law in Context, 2015, v. 33, n. 1, p. viii
- Article
22
- Punishment & Society, 2003, v. 5, n. 3, p. 327, doi. 10.1177/1462474503005003006
- Article
23
- Istorijski Zapisi, 2010, v. 83, n. 1, p. 259
- Article
25
- Sixteenth Century Journal, 2012, v. 43, n. 1, p. 103, doi. 10.1086/scj23210757
- Article
27
- Anuario Argentino de Derecho Canónico, 2007, v. 14, p. 241
- Article
29
- Law & History Review, 2014, v. 32, n. 3, p. f1, doi. 10.1017/S0738248014000273
- Article
30
- Law & History Review, 2014, v. 32, n. 3, p. 611, doi. 10.1017/S0738248014000248
- Article
32
- Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 2017, v. 15, n. 2, p. 121, doi. 10.1080/14794012.2016.1268790
- Article
33
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2016, v. 36, n. 1, p. 58, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqv014
- Article
35
- History, 2000, v. 85, n. 278, p. 216, doi. 10.1111/1468-229x.00144
- Article
36
- Scandinavian Economic History Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 2, p. 103, doi. 10.1080/03585522.2016.1175376
- Article
37
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2012, v. 60, n. 4, p. 1043, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2012.0010
- Article
38
- American Scholar, 1982, v. 51, n. 4, p. 521
- Article
39
- Parliamentary History, 2016, v. 35, n. 2, p. 196, doi. 10.1111/1750-0206.12222
- Article
41
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2012, v. 10, n. 5, p. 1029, doi. 10.1093/jicj/mqs086
- Article
42
- Early American Studies, An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2016, v. 14, n. 3, p. 537, doi. 10.1353/eam.2016.0017
- Article
43
- Stanford Law Review, 2018, v. 70, n. 5, p. 1665
- Article
46
- Culture Crossroads, 2019, v. 13, p. 84
- Article
47
- Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2012, v. 20, n. 2, p. 501
- Article
48
- Albany Government Law Review, 2011, v. 4, n. 3, p. 779
- Article
49
- Historical Research, 2020, v. 93, n. 262, p. 621, doi. 10.1093/hisres/htaa021
- Article
50
- Journal of Legal History, 2017, v. 38, n. 2, p. 130, doi. 10.1080/01440365.2017.1336890
- Article