Works matching DE "HEARSAY evidence"

Results: 309

NONTESTIMONIAL: STATE CHILD HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS IN THE POST-CRAWFORD ERA.

Published in:

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2025, v. 39, n. 1, p. 389

By:

BRUMMOND, MCKENZIE JORDAN

Publication type:

Article

Functional transition from hear to nonvisual sensory and hearsay evidential categories: A case study of rGyalthang Tibetan.

Published in:

Functions of Language, 2024, v. 31, n. 1, p. 63, doi. 10.1075/fol.22059.suz

By:

Suzuki, Hiroyuki

Publication type:

Article

Joe Hill One Hundred Years Later: The Case for Reliable Hearsay Never Died.

Published in:

2015

By:

Lougee, Kenneth;
Pritchard, Adam Thomas

Publication type:

Case Study

Hearsay in the Modern Age: Balancing Practicality and Reliability by Amending Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A).

Published in:

George Washington Law Review, 2019, v. 87, n. 1, p. 207

By:

Smedley, Madeline

Publication type:

Article

Commentary pragmatic markers in Nigerian English.

Published in:

English World-Wide, 2018, v. 39, n. 2, p. 190, doi. 10.1075/eww.00010.unu

By:

Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka;
Gut, Ulrike

Publication type:

Article

The Influence of First-Hand Testimony and Hearsay on Children's Belief in the Improbable.

Published in:

2018

By:

Lane, Jonathan D.;
Ronfard, Samuel;
El‐Sherif, Diana;
El-Sherif, Diana

Publication type:

journal article

But What if the Court Reporter Is Lying? The Right to Confront Hidden Declarants Found in Transcripts of Former Testimony.

Published in:

Brigham Young University Law Review, 2010, v. 2010, n. 4, p. 1149

By:

Nicolas, Peter

Publication type:

Article

Responding to Concerned Family Members during a Mental Health Crisis: Reflections on a Critical Incident.

Published in:

Developments in Mental Health Law, 2015, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1

By:

Oliver, John E.

Publication type:

Article

RUS v COMCARE: THE RULES OF EVIDENCE IN THE AAT.

Published in:

University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review, 2017, v. 19, p. 1

By:

CARDACI, NICHOLAS

Publication type:

Article

EXAMINING COMMITTEE REPORTS AS A BASIS TO DISMISS PETITIONS TODETERMINE INCAPACITY: A QUESTION OF ADMISSIBILITY AND EVIDENTIARY RELEVANCY.

Published in:

St. Thomas Law Review, 2013, v. 25, n. 3, p. 317

By:

ZAMORA, ENRIQUE;
VASQUEZ, ANDRES

Publication type:

Article

HEARSAY AFTER CRAWFORD: A PRACTITIONER'S GUIDE.

Published in:

St. Thomas Law Review, 2011, v. 23, n. 4, p. 509

By:

COOKE, MARCIA G.

Publication type:

Article

HEARSAY IN THE SMILEY FACE: ANALYZING THE USE OF EMOJIS AS EVIDENCE.

Published in:

St. Mary's Law Journal, 2018, v. 49, n. 3, p. 699

By:

JANSSEN, ERIN

Publication type:

Article

DISTINGUISHING LAY FROM EXPERT OPINION: THE NEED TO FOCUS ON THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE REASONING PROCESSES USED BY LAY AND EXPERT WITNESSES.

Published in:

SMU Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 1, p. 73

By:

Imwinkelried, Edward J.

Publication type:

Article

FRIEND OR FOE? THE SIXTH AMENDMENT CONFRONTATION CLAUSE IN POST-CONVICTION FORMAL REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS.

Published in:

SMU Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 1, p. 227

By:

Hong, Esther K.

Publication type:

Article

SEEKING MORE THAN TRUTH: A RATIONALIZATION OF THE PRINCIPLED EXCEPTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE.

Published in:

Alberta Law Review, 2011, v. 48, n. 3, p. 753, doi. 10.29173/alr149

By:

MOEN, SHAWN

Publication type:

Article

ELECTORAL EVIDENCE.

Published in:

Alabama Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 1, p. 109

By:

Nicolas, Peter

Publication type:

Article

INEFFICIENT EVIDENCE.

Published in:

Alabama Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 3, p. 423

By:

Stein, Alex

Publication type:

Article

The Death of Fighter Pilot Lidiia Litviak: Rumor and Hearsay as Historical Evidence.

Published in:

Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 2024, v. 37, n. 2, p. 168, doi. 10.1080/13518046.2024.2375147

By:

Pennington, Reina

Publication type:

Article

NO MORE SPLITTING: USING A FACTUAL INQUIRY TO DETERMINE SIMILAR MOTIVE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 804(b)(1).

Published in:

Valparaiso University Law Review, 2010, v. 45, n. 1, p. 157

By:

Horvath, William J.

Publication type:

Article

SOUTH DAKOTA EVIDENCE: SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS.

Published in:

South Dakota Law Review, 2018, v. 63, n. 2, p. 239

By:

HUTTON, CHRIS

Publication type:

Article

When Snitches Corroborate: Effects of Post-identification Feedback from a Potentially Compromised Source.

Published in:

Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2016, v. 23, n. 1, p. 148, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2015.1035623

By:

Erickson, William Blake;
Lampinen, James Michael;
Wooten, Alex;
Wetmore, Stacy;
Neuschatz, Jeffrey

Publication type:

Article

Admissibility of Computer-Generated Evidence Under Nigeria's (New) Evidence Act, 2011.

Published in:

International Journal of Legal Information, 2012, v. 40, n. 3, p. 583, doi. 10.1017/S0731126500011458

By:

SILAS AKINWUMI, OLAYINKA;
TIAWO LAWAL, KAMORU

Publication type:

Article

scéal scéil/hearsay.

Published in:

Eire-Ireland, 2021, n. 3/4, p. 290, doi. 10.1353/eir.2021.0025

By:

DE FRÉINE, CELIA

Publication type:

Article

Evidentiary value and evidentiary status of blockchain evidence.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2025, v. 29, n. 1, p. 58, doi. 10.1177/13657127241238020

By:

Su, Zelin

Publication type:

Article

Indigenous storytelling and admissibility in common law courts: Developing the protocols for the reception theory of evidence.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2023, v. 27, n. 2, p. 143, doi. 10.1177/13657127231155922

By:

Akhtar, Zia

Publication type:

Article

Whither, hither and thither, Res Gestae ? A comparative analysis of its relevance and application.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2021, v. 25, n. 4, p. 326, doi. 10.1177/13657127211036168

By:

Teong Ying Keat, Edwin

Publication type:

Article

Admissibility of confession evidence: Principles of hearsay and the rule of voluntariness.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2021, v. 25, n. 2, p. 93, doi. 10.1177/13657127211002287

By:

Porter, Jennifer

Publication type:

Article

Hearsay evidence in Uganda: Understanding its meaning, admissibility and probative value.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2020, v. 24, n. 4, p. 418, doi. 10.1177/1365712720960241

By:

Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira

Publication type:

Article

R v Bradshaw.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2018, v. 22, n. 1, p. 68, doi. 10.1177/1365712717746420

By:

Hunt, Chris D. L.;
Rankin, Micah B.

Publication type:

Article

Evidencing domestic violence*, including behaviour that falls under the new offence of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2018, v. 22, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/1365712717725535

By:

Bishop, Charlotte;
Bettinson, Vanessa

Publication type:

Article

‘In the interests of justice’ as the new test to exclude relevant evidence in Singapore: ANB v ANC [2014] SGHC 172; Wan Lai Ting v Kea Kah Kim [2014] SGHC 180.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2015, v. 19, n. 1, p. 67, doi. 10.1177/1365712714566374

By:

Siyuan, Chen

Publication type:

Article

The admissibility of an extra-curial admission by an accused as hearsay evidence against a co-accused in South Africa: Litako and others v S reconsidering S v Ndhlovu & others.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2015, v. 19, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/1365712714561188

By:

Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira

Publication type:

Article

CASE COMMENTARIES.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2014, v. 18, n. 4, p. 353, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2014.18.4.466

By:

Gans, Jeremy

Publication type:

Article

Hearsay by implication: R v Baldree.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2014, v. 18, n. 2, p. 181, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.448

By:

Hunt, Chris;
Rankin, Micah

Publication type:

Article

Hearsay evidence in South Africa: should courts add the 'sole and decisive rule' to their arsenal?

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2013, v. 17, n. 4, p. 347, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2013.17.4.436

By:

Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira

Publication type:

Article

Hearsay, bad character and trust in the jury: Irish and English contrasts.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2013, v. 17, n. 3, p. 250, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2013.17.3.429

By:

Coen, Mark

Publication type:

Article

The admissibility of hearsay and Crown appeals against acquittal in New Zealand: a free for all for the Crown?

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2010, v. 14, n. 4, p. 346, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2010.14.4.363

By:

Gallavin, Chris;
Whiley, Emma

Publication type:

Article

A political judgment? Reconciling hearsay and the right to challenge.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2010, v. 14, n. 3, p. 232, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2010.14.3.356

By:

Jones, Imogen

Publication type:

Article

Horncastle v R: Statements from witnesses absent at trial.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2009, v. 13, n. 4, p. 324, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2009.13.4.332

By:

Webster, Adam

Publication type:

Article

Case Commentaries.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2009, v. 13, n. 3, p. 232, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2009.13.3.325

By:

Pattenden, Rosemary

Publication type:

Article

R v Lenaghan: Is it business as usual in New Zealand despite the reforms of the Evidence Act 2006?

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2008, v. 12, n. 4, p. 325, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2008.12.4.305

By:

Gallavin, Chris

Publication type:

Article

Noticeboard.

Published in:: 2007
Publication type:: Abstract

R v Khelawon—continuing reform of the law of hearsay in Canada.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2007, v. 11, n. 3, p. 213, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2007.11.3.213

By:

Ives, Dale E.

Publication type:

Article

The common enterprise exception to the hearsay rule.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2007, v. 11, n. 2, p. 106, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.106

By:

Spencer, Keith

Publication type:

Article

The hearsay rule under the Criminal Justice Act 2003: R v Xhabri (Agrol).

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2006, v. 10, n. 4, p. 316, doi. 10.1350/ijep.10.4.316

By:

Malik, Billal

Publication type:

Article

Hearsay--United States.

Published in:: International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2004, v. 8, n. 4, p. 256
Publication type:: Article

Confrontation and hearsay: a critique of Crawford.

Published in:

International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2004, v. 8, n. 3, p. 147, doi. 10.1350/ijep.8.3.147.40870

By:

Ho, H.L.

Publication type:

Article

Witness Statements under the IBA Rules of Evidence: What to Do about Hearsay?

Published in:

Arbitration International, 2005, v. 21, n. 3, p. 301, doi. 10.1093/arbitration/21.3.301

By:

Strong, S. I.;
Dries, James J.

Publication type:

Article

Witness Statements under the IBA Rules of Evidence: What to Do about Hearsay?

Published in:

Arbitration International, 2003, v. 19, n. 2, p. 301

By:

Strong, S. I.;
Dries, James J.

Publication type:

Article

How to guarantee the realibility of expert testimony -- reality in China.

Published in:

Journal of Eastern European Criminal Law, 2018, n. 2, p. 136

By:

Cheng Yan

Publication type:

Article