Works matching DE "GREAT Britain. Human Rights Act 1998"
1
- Human Rights Quarterly, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 386, doi. 10.1353/hrq.2013.0021
- Article
2
- Pandora's Box (1835-8624), 2014, p. 18
- Article
3
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2017, v. 36, n. 2, p. 355
- Article
4
- 2017
- Ferrere, Marcelo B. Rodriguez
- Book Review
5
- Judicial Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 1, p. 14, doi. 10.5235/108546811795316582
- Article
6
- Judicial Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 1, p. 66, doi. 10.5235/108546811795316555
- Article
7
- Judicial Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 1, p. 22, doi. 10.5235/108546811795316564
- Westgate, Martin;
- Markus, Kate
- Article
8
- Industrial Law Journal, 2020, v. 49, n. 3, p. 477, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwaa013
- Article
9
- Industrial Law Journal, 2017, v. 46, n. 4, p. 543, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwx012
- Article
10
- Politics, 2010, v. 30, n. 2, p. 91, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01371.x
- Article
11
- Monash University Law Review, 2018, v. 44, n. 3, p. 520
- Article
12
- Monash University Law Review, 2017, v. 43, n. 1, p. 195
- Article
13
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2011, v. 9, n. 1, p. 172, doi. 10.1093/icon/mor026
- Article
14
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2006, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/icon/moi051
- Article
15
- Modern Law Review, 2020, v. 83, n. 2, p. 285, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12490
- Article
16
- Modern Law Review, 2019, v. 82, n. 3, p. 525, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12417
- Article
17
- Modern Law Review, 2018, v. 81, n. 5, p. 874, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12367
- Article
18
- Modern Law Review, 2018, v. 81, n. 5, p. 825, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12366
- Article
19
- American Journal of Legal History, 2012, v. 52, n. 2, p. 183
- Article
20
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2011, v. 43, n. 4, p. 1107
- Article
21
- Political Quarterly, 2019, v. 90, p. 164, doi. 10.1111/1467-923X.12614
- Article
22
- Political Quarterly, 2012, v. 83, n. 3, p. 466, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02348.x
- Article
23
- Political Quarterly, 2012, v. 83, n. 3, p. 466, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02349.x
- Article
24
- Political Quarterly, 2012, v. 83, n. 1, p. 60, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02274.x
- Article
25
- Political Quarterly, 2009, v. 80, n. 3, p. 420, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.01997.x
- Article
26
- Parliamentary Affairs, 2014, v. 67, n. 1, p. 209, doi. 10.1093/pa/gss042
- Article
27
- Parliamentary Affairs, 2014, v. 67, n. 1, p. 80, doi. 10.1093/pa/gst023
- Article
30
- Nursing Standard, 2010, v. 24, n. 42, p. 9
- Article
32
- King's Law Journal, 2017, v. 28, n. 2, p. 343, doi. 10.1080/09615768.2017.1363541
- Article
33
- King's Law Journal, 2017, v. 28, n. 2, p. 173, doi. 10.1080/09615768.2017.1362793
- Article
34
- King's Law Journal, 2014, v. 25, n. 1, p. 34, doi. 10.5235/09615768.25.1.34
- Article
35
- British Journal of Community Justice (BJCJ), 2016, v. 14, n. 3, p. 35
- Crowther-Dowey, Chris;
- Silvestri, Marisa
- Article
36
- Asia Pacific Law Review, 2013, v. 21, n. 2, p. 141, doi. 10.1080/10192557.2013.11788271
- Article
37
- History Today, 2012, v. 62, n. 1, p. 16
- Article
38
- Modern Law Review, 2009, v. 72, n. 6, p. 984, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00777.x
- Hodgson, Jacqueline;
- Tadros, Victor
- Article
39
- Statute Law Review, 2021, v. 42, n. 3, p. 344, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmaa005
- Article
40
- Statute Law Review, 2006, v. 27, n. 1, p. 29, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmi023
- Article
43
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2014, v. 13, n. 3/4, p. 243, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgu007
- Article
44
- Industrial Law Journal, 2004, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/ilj/33.1.1
- Article
45
- 2019
- Tucker, Shannon;
- Owen, Natasha
- Proceeding
46
- Legal Studies, 2019, v. 39, n. 1, p. 166, doi. 10.1017/lst.2018.30
- Article
47
- Legal Studies, 2019, v. 39, n. 1, p. 120, doi. 10.1017/lst.2018.18
- Article
48
- Legal Studies, 2018, v. 38, n. 3, p. 360, doi. 10.1017/lst.2017.25
- Article
49
- Judicial Review, 2016, v. 21, n. 1, p. 44, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2016.1146499
- Article
50
- Judicial Review, 2016, v. 21, n. 1, p. 58, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2016.1152098
- Article