General Municipal and Boilermakers Union v Henderson.
- Published in:
- Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2015, v. 4, n. 3, p. 539, doi. 10.1093/ojlr/rwv040
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "GREAT Britain. Employment Appeal Tribunal"
Results: 20
1
2
Landmark tribunal rules in favour of midwives.
- Published in:
- 2005
- Publication type:
- Journal Article
3
Labor Law.
- Published in:
- ILR Review, 1983, v. 36, n. 3, p. 511
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Shock Decision for End of (Fixed) Term.
- Published in:
- Education Journal, 2012, n. 133, p. 6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Maternity Leave and Loss of the Right to Return.
- Published in:
- Gender, Work & Organization, 1998, v. 5, n. 4, p. 245, doi. 10.1111/1468-0432.00061
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Employment Appeals Tribunal. http://www.employmentappeals.gov.uk.
- Published in:
- 2002
- By:
- Publication type:
- Web Site Review
7
Secretary of State for Justice v Windle: The Expanding Frontiers of Mutuality of Obligation?
- Published in:
- Industrial Law Journal, 2017, v. 46, n. 2, p. 268, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwx002
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Addressing Disparate Impact: Indirect Discrimination and the Public Sector Equality Duty.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
9
TUPE, Variation of Employment Terms, and the ETO Reason.
- Published in:
- Industrial Law Journal, 2014, v. 43, n. 3, p. 364, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwu019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Proving Constructive Dismissal: Should One Be Concerned With What Was in the Employer's Mind?
- Published in:
- Industrial Law Journal, 2005, v. 34, n. 1, p. 96, doi. 10.1093/ilj/34.1.96
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Who is a Worker?
- Published in:
- Industrial Law Journal, 2005, v. 34, n. 1, p. 57, doi. 10.1093/ilj/34.1.57
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Unfair Dismissal and Human Rights.
- Published in:
- Industrial Law Journal, 2004, v. 33, n. 1, p. 52, doi. 10.1093/ilj/33.1.52
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
How Should Safety Concerns Be Handled?
- Published in:
- Industrial Law Journal, 2004, v. 33, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.1093/ilj/33.1.42
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
TUPE Transfers: The Cracks Still Show.
- Published in:
- Industrial Law Journal, 2001, v. 30, n. 4, p. 396, doi. 10.1093/ilj/30.4.396
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Recent cases. Note. Re-employment as a remedy for unfair dismissal: how can the culture be changed?
- Published in:
- Industrial Law Journal, 1999, v. 28, n. 2, p. 183, doi. 10.1093/ilj/28.2.183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Recent case. Commentary. The range of reasonable responses test - from guidelines to statute.
- Published in:
- 1998
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
17
NOTES: Discrimination Law: Requirements and Preferences: Falkirk Council and Others v Whyte and Others [1997]IRLR 560 (EAT).
- Published in:
- Industrial Law Journal, 1998, v. 27, n. 2, p. 133, doi. 10.1093/ilj/27.2.133
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
2019/2 Test of 'good faith' in victimisation claims is employee's honesty, not motivation (UK).
- Published in:
- European Employment Law Cases, 2019, v. 4, n. 1, p. 19, doi. 10.5553/EELC/187791072019004001003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
2018/13 Discrimination based on perceived disability found unlawful (UK).
- Published in:
- European Employment Law Cases, 2018, n. 2, p. 9, doi. 10.5553/EELC/187791072018003002004
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Case C-303/06 Coleman v. Attridge Law and Steve Law Judgment of the ECJ 17 July 2008; Judgment of the Employment Tribunal, London, 30 September 2008.
- Published in:
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2009, v. 31, n. 3, p. 309, doi. 10.1080/09649060903354621
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article