Works matching DE "GREAT Britain. Court of Appeal"
1
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2025, v. 89, n. 3, p. 174, doi. 10.1177/00220183251346398
- Article
2
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2025, v. 89, n. 3, p. 123, doi. 10.1177/00220183251336101
- Fayanju, Ayokunle;
- James, Annabelle
- Article
3
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2025, v. 89, n. 3, p. 180, doi. 10.1177/00220183251329206
- Article
4
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2017, v. 22, n. 3, p. 101
- Article
5
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2013, v. 18, n. 4, p. 112
- Article
6
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2012, v. 17, n. 4, p. 115
- Article
7
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2012, v. 17, n. 3, p. 98
- Article
8
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2012, v. 17, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
9
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2011, v. 16, n. 3, p. 114
- Article
10
- Cracow Studies of Constitutional & Legal History / Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, 2021, v. 14, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.4467/20844131KS.21.004.13271
- Article
11
- Dispute Resolution International, 2019, v. 13, n. 1, p. 69
- Article
12
- Construction Law International, 2013, v. 7, n. 4, p. 4
- Dawson, Philip;
- Lau, Victor;
- Bulut, Vanja
- Article
13
- Sexualities, 2020, v. 23, n. 8, p. 1362, doi. 10.1177/1363460719886733
- Article
14
- Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
15
- Alberta Law Review, 2021, v. 58, n. 3, p. 739, doi. 10.29173/alr2646
- Article
16
- Judicial Review, 2012, v. 17, n. 4, p. 326, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2012.11426747
- Article
17
- Judicial Review, 2010, v. 15, n. 2, p. 157, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2010.11426648
- Article
18
- Judicial Review, 2009, v. 14, n. 2, p. 148, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2009.11426599
- Article
20
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2016, v. 20, n. 3, p. 183, doi. 10.1177/1365712716642356
- Article
21
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2015, v. 19, n. 3, p. 190, doi. 10.1177/1365712715589468
- Article
22
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2015, v. 19, n. 2, p. 120, doi. 10.1177/1365712715570784
- McCartney, Carole;
- Speechless, Naomi
- Article
23
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2015, v. 19, n. 2, p. 83, doi. 10.1177/1365712714568072
- Article
24
- Common Law World Review, 2023, v. 52, n. 4, p. 103, doi. 10.1177/14737795231206156
- Morgan, Jennifer;
- Willmington, Lizzy
- Article
25
- Common Law World Review, 2017, v. 46, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1177/1473779516689074
- Article
26
- Environmental Law Review, 2022, v. 24, n. 2, p. 128, doi. 10.1177/14614529221102760
- Article
27
- Industrial Law Journal, 2024, v. 53, n. 3, p. 543, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwae027
- Article
28
- Industrial Law Journal, 2020, v. 49, n. 4, p. 626, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwaa015
- Article
29
- Industrial Law Journal, 2020, v. 49, n. 3, p. 397, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwaa010
- Fodder, Martin;
- Lewis, Jeremy;
- QC, John Bowers
- Article
30
- Industrial Law Journal, 2018, v. 47, n. 1, p. 121, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwy001
- BOWERS Q. C., JOHN;
- LEWIS, JEREMY
- Article
31
- Industrial Law Journal, 2017, v. 46, n. 2, p. 268, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwx002
- Article
32
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2018, v. 4, n. 4, p. 520, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2018/4/16
- Article
33
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 267, doi. 10.1007/s10691-021-09451-9
- Article
34
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2009, v. 17, n. 2, p. 219, doi. 10.1007/s10691-009-9122-9
- Article
35
- Gender, Work & Organization, 1998, v. 5, n. 4, p. 245, doi. 10.1111/1468-0432.00061
- Article
36
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2018, v. 40, n. 2, p. 234, doi. 10.1080/09649069.2018.1451045
- Article
37
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2017, v. 39, n. 4, p. 501, doi. 10.1080/09649069.2017.1390298
- Article
38
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2016, v. 38, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.1080/09649069.2016.1145838
- Article
39
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 228, doi. 10.1080/09649069.2015.1028156
- Article
40
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2014, v. 36, n. 1, p. 82, doi. 10.1080/09649069.2014.886882
- Article
41
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2014, v. 36, n. 1, p. 76, doi. 10.1080/09649069.2014.886879
- Article
42
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2010, v. 32, n. 1, p. 71, doi. 10.1080/09649061003675907
- Article
43
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2008, v. 30, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1080/09649060802469843
- Article
44
- Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 2003, v. 25, n. 3, p. 243, doi. 10.1080/0964906032000145993
- Laing, Judith M.;
- Stone, Nigel
- Article
45
- Uniform Law Review, 2025, v. 30, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1093/ulr/unaf014
- Article
46
- Monash University Law Review, 2017, v. 43, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
47
- Police Journal, 2011, v. 84, n. 1, p. 99, doi. 10.1350/pojo.2011.84.1.555
- Wicks, David;
- Carney, Damian
- Article
48
- Police Journal, 2007, v. 80, n. 2, p. 167, doi. 10.1350/pojo.2007.80.2.167
- Article
49
- Police Journal, 2002, v. 75, n. 2, p. 180
- Article
50
- Police Journal, 2002, v. 75, n. 2, p. 176
- Article