Works matching DE "GREAT Britain. Court of Appeal"
1
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2018, v. 23, n. 4, p. 220
- Article
2
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2018, v. 23, n. 4, p. 175
- Article
3
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2017, v. 22, n. 3, p. 101
- Article
4
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2013, v. 18, n. 4, p. 112
- Article
5
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2012, v. 17, n. 4, p. 115
- Article
6
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2012, v. 17, n. 3, p. 98
- Article
7
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2012, v. 17, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
8
- Communications Law: Journal of Computer, Media & Telecommunications Law, 2011, v. 16, n. 3, p. 114
- Article
9
- International Insolvency Review, 2023, v. 32, n. 3, p. 562, doi. 10.1002/iir.1508
- Article
10
- International Insolvency Review, 2022, v. 31, n. 1, p. 8, doi. 10.1002/iir.1442
- Article
11
- History Today, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 5
- Article
13
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2013, v. 58, n. 2/3, p. 433, doi. 10.1177/0003603X1305800209
- O'REGAN, MATTHEW;
- JEFFERSON, RUTH
- Article
14
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2024, v. 19, n. 10, p. 764, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpae057
- Leistner, Matthias;
- Berns, Sebastian
- Article
15
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2021, v. 16, n. 8, p. 773, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpab103
- Linsner, Marc;
- Blum, Jeremy
- Article
16
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2020, v. 15, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz158
- Article
17
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 12, p. 922, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz136
- Jacob, Reuben;
- Strath, Janet
- Article
18
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 12, p. 926, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz128
- Article
19
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 5, p. 401, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz018
- Article
20
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 3, p. 176, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpy187
- Shillito, Mark;
- Sherratt, Emma E
- Article
21
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2015, v. 10, n. 4, p. 230, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpv009
- Article
22
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2015, v. 10, n. 4, p. 229, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpv008
- Article
23
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 6, p. 461, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu058
- Article
24
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 6, p. 463, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu059
- Article
25
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 4, p. 272, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt005
- Article
26
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 4, p. 270, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt004
- Article
27
- Nursing Standard, 2012, v. 26, n. 52, p. 62, doi. 10.7748/ns.26.52.62.s51
- Article
28
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2013, v. 7, n. 6, p. 323, doi. 10.5235/17521440.7.6.323
- Article
29
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2013, v. 7, n. 4, p. 212, doi. 10.5235/17521440.7.4.212
- Article
30
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2012, v. 6, n. 1, p. 78, doi. 10.5235/175214412799195166
- Article
31
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2010, v. 4, n. 6, p. 605, doi. 10.5235/175214410793369297
- Article
32
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2009, v. 3, n. 6, p. 565
- Article
33
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2009, v. 3, n. 6, p. 552
- Article
34
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2009, v. 3, n. 6, p. 550
- Article
35
- Sexualities, 2020, v. 23, n. 8, p. 1362, doi. 10.1177/1363460719886733
- Article
36
- Judicial Review, 2018, v. 23, n. 3, p. 195, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2018.1531508
- Article
37
- Judicial Review, 2018, v. 23, n. 3, p. 145, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2018.1529870
- Article
38
- Judicial Review, 2017, v. 22, n. 2, p. 149, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2017.1340236
- Article
39
- Judicial Review, 2017, v. 22, n. 2, p. 105, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2017.1339426
- Article
40
- Judicial Review, 2017, v. 22, n. 1, p. 27, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2017.1317053
- Westgate QC, Martin;
- Felix, Alexandra
- Article
41
- Judicial Review, 2016, v. 21, n. 4, p. 253, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2017.1278960
- Article
42
- Judicial Review, 2016, v. 21, n. 4, p. 269, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2016.1272907
- Article
43
- Judicial Review, 2016, v. 21, n. 4, p. 261, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2016.1258141
- Foster, Anjoli;
- Seitler, Miriam
- Article
45
- European Employment Law Cases, 2019, v. 4, n. 2, p. 112, doi. 10.5553/EELC/187791072019004002014
- Article
46
- European Employment Law Cases, 2018, v. 3, n. 3, p. 18, doi. 10.5553/EELC/187791072018003003007
- Article
47
- European Employment Law Cases, 2018, p. 18, doi. 10.5553/EELC/187791072018003001003
- Article
48
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2018, v. 4, n. 4, p. 520, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2018/4/16
- Article
49
- California Law Review, 2024, v. 112, p. 625, doi. 10.15779/Z386T0GX53
- Article
50
- Journal of Legal History, 2015, v. 36, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1080/01440365.2015.1007902
- Article