Works matching DE "GREAT Britain. Bill of Rights"
1
- Statute Law Review, 2014, v. 35, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmu021
- Article
2
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2012, v. 6, n. 4, p. 292, doi. 10.5235/LFMR6.4.292
- Article
3
- Judicial Review, 2018, v. 23, n. 2, p. 128, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2018.1492076
- Article
4
- Judicial Review, 2017, v. 22, n. 2, p. 165, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2017.1315899
- Article
5
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2016, v. 46, n. 1, p. 140, doi. 10.1111/psq.12255
- Article
6
- Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, 2018, v. 18, n. 2, p. 83, doi. 10.1353/jem.2018.0012
- Article
7
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2013, v. 38, n. 3, p. 309, doi. 10.1353/sch.2013.0002
- Article
8
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2014, v. 19, n. 1, p. 25
- Article
9
- Vermont Law Review, 2017, v. 42, n. 2, p. 297
- Article
11
- Legal Studies, 2014, v. 34, n. 3, p. 444, doi. 10.1111/lest.12025
- Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin;
- O'Meara, Noreen
- Article
12
- Political Studies Review, 2014, v. 12, n. 1, p. 125, doi. 10.1111/1478-9302.12041_59
- Article
13
- Northwestern Journal of Human Rights, 2018, v. 16, n. 1, p. 22
- Boyle, Katie;
- Cochrane, Leanne
- Article
14
- German Law Journal, 2014, v. 15, n. 3, p. 407, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200018976
- Article
15
- German Law Journal, 2013, v. 14, n. 12, p. 2253, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200002765
- Article
16
- Journal of Media Law, 2023, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/17577632.2023.2213914
- Article
17
- Denning Law Journal, 2017, v. 29, n. 1, p. 131, doi. 10.5750/dlj.v29i1.1406
- Article
18
- Judicial Review, 2015, v. 20, n. 2, p. 73, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2015.1046311
- Article
19
- English Historical Review, 2024, v. 139, n. 600, p. 1117, doi. 10.1093/ehr/ceae155
- Article
20
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2022, v. 42, n. 3, p. 918, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqac008
- Article
21
- Pace Law Review, 2009, v. 30, n. 2, p. 544
- Article
22
- Pace International Law Review, 2014, v. 26, n. 2, p. 131, doi. 10.58948/2331-3536.1343
- Article
23
- Liverpool Law Review, 2017, v. 38, n. 3, p. 287, doi. 10.1007/s10991-017-9202-x
- Article
24
- Utrecht Law Review, 2013, v. 9, n. 2, p. 6, doi. 10.18352/ulr.222
- Article
25
- Public Sector, 2022, v. 45, n. 2, p. 3
- Article
26
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2022, v. 26, n. 2, p. 244, doi. 10.3366/elr.2022.0764
- Article
27
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2016, v. 20, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.3366/elr.2016.0319
- Article
28
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2020, v. 83, n. 3, p. 195
- Article
29
- Critical Quarterly, 1984, v. 26, n. 1/2, p. 87, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8705.1984.tb00702.x
- Article
30
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2019, v. 27, n. 4, p. 989
- Article
31
- Sydney Law Review, 2014, v. 36, n. 3, p. 413
- Article
32
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 252
- Article
33
- Parliamentary Affairs, 2014, v. 67, n. 1, p. 80, doi. 10.1093/pa/gst023
- Article
34
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2014, v. 108, n. 2, p. 543
- Article
35
- Tiempo de Paz, 2008, n. 90, p. 21
- Article
36
- European Journal of International Law, 2017, v. 28, n. 3, p. 763, doi. 10.1093/ejil/chx044
- Article
37
- European Constitutional Law Review, 2023, v. 19, n. 1, p. 88, doi. 10.1017/S1574019623000019
- Article
39
- 2014
- Osmond, Russell L.;
- Lincoln, Abraham
- Speech
40
- Political Quarterly, 2012, v. 83, n. 3, p. 466, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02349.x
- Article
41
- Modern Law Review, 2017, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1111, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12304
- FENwick, HelEN;
- Masterman, Roger
- Article
42
- Common Law World Review, 2016, v. 45, n. 2/3, p. 101, doi. 10.1177/1473779516660486
- Liu, Hin Ting;
- Chan, Joshua
- Article
43
- eJournal of Tax Research, 2020, v. 18, n. 2, p. 441
- Article
44
- Virginia Law Review, 2021, v. 107, n. 8, p. 1777
- Article