Finding a Path Through the Political Thicket: In Defense of Partisan Gerrymandering's Justiciability.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 4, p. 917
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "GERRYMANDERING lawsuits"
Results: 22
1
2
RUCHO V. COMMON CAUSE: THE GOVERNMENT GAME OF HOT POTATO.
- Published in:
- Denver Law Review, 2020, v. 98, n. 1, p. 229
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
THE STRUCTURAL CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE OF REPUBLICAN LEGITIMACY.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2012, v. 54, n. 2, p. 371
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
A REPUBLIC, IF THE COURTS CAN KEEP IT?
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2019, v. 2020, n. 2, p. 395
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
DOCKET CONTROL, MANDATORY JURISDICTION, AND THE SUPREME COURT'S FAILURE IN RUCHO V. COMMON CAUSE.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2019, v. 2020, n. 2, p. 301
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
GERRYMANDERING AND JUDICIAL INCAPACITY.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2019, v. 2020, n. 2, p. 257
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
A TURN TO PROCESS: PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING POST-RUCHO.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2023, v. 98, n. 6, p. 2111
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
WHEN JUDGES AND JUSTICES THROW OUT TOOLS: JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN RUCHO V. COMMON CAUSE.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2021, v. 96, n. 3, p. 607
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
DEVELOPING A SPEECH OR DEBATE CLAUSE FRAMEWORK FOR REDISTRICTING LITIGATION.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 1, p. 238
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
The Ghost Ship of Gerrymandering Law.
- Published in:
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2017, p. 59
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
How digital evidence supported gerrymandering claims.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 10, p. 8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING AND THE QUALIFICATIONS CLAUSE.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 1, p. 303
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
UNDERMINING CHECKS AND BALANCES: THE FALLOUT OF MAESTAS V. HALL.
- Published in:
- New Mexico Law Review, 2014, v. 44, n. 1, p. 277
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
ECHOING INTO THE VOID: RUCHO'S STATE-LEVEL PROGENY.
- Published in:
- Utah Law Review, 2024, v. 2024, n. 5, p. 1131, doi. 10.63140/5b5nl8ejr8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
DRAWING THE LINE: A FIRST AMENDMENT FRAMEWORK FOR PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING IN THE WAKE OF RUCHO V. COMMON CAUSE.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2020, v. 79, n. 3, p. 798
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
RUCHO IS RIGHT-BUT FOR THE WRONG REASONS.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2021, v. 23, n. 4, p. 865
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--REAPPORTIONMENT--PUBLIC INTEREST AND URGENCY RIPENS A PENDING REDISTRICTING REFERENDUM CONTROVERSY INTO A JUSTICIABLE MATTER. VANDERMOST v. BOWEN, 269 P.3D 446 (CAL. 2012 ).
- Published in:
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2014, v. 44, n. 4, p. 801
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Politicians as Fiduciaries: Public Law v. Private Law When Altering the Date of an Election.
- Published in:
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2020, v. 77, n. 4, p. 1463
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
GOVERNMENT STANDING AND THE FALLACY OF INSTITUTIONAL INJURY.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2019, v. 167, n. 3, p. 611
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
GERRYMANDERING AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL NORM AGAINST GOVERNMENT PARTISANSHIP.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2017, v. 116, n. 3, p. 351, doi. 10.36644/mlr.116.3.gerrymandering
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING AND THE SHOW ME STATE: APPLYING THE STANDARD IN WHITFORD V. GILL TO THE CONTEXT OF MISSOURI'S STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS.
- Published in:
- UMKC Law Review, 2019, v. 88, n. 1, p. 181
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
NOT GILL-TY: CHALLENGING AND PROVIDING A WORKABLE ALTERNATIVE TO THE SUPREME COURT'S GERRYMANDERING STANDING ANALYSIS IN GILL V. WHITFORD.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2020, v. 28, n. 3, p. 831
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article