Works matching DE "GENETICS laws"
1
- 2015
- Philibert, Robert;
- Erwin, Cheryl
- journal article
2
- Nature Biotechnology, 2001, v. 19, n. 5, p. 400, doi. 10.1038/88035
- Article
3
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 3, p. 505
- Article
5
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 117
- Article
6
- Canadian Journal of Criminology & Criminal Justice, 2006, v. 48, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.3138/cjccj.48.1.61
- House, John C.;
- Cullen, Richard M.;
- Snook, Brent;
- Noble, Paul
- Article
7
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2010, v. 14, n. 4, p. 326, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2010.14.4.362
- Naughton, Michael;
- Tan, Gabe
- Article
8
- Nature, 2008, v. 453, n. 7191, p. -1, doi. 10.1038/453009a
- Article
9
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2016, v. 44, n. 2, p. 342, doi. 10.1177/1073110516654127
- Article
10
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2013, v. 41, n. 3, p. 733, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12083
- Article
11
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2013, v. 41, p. 65, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12042
- Article
12
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2011, v. 39, n. 3, p. 469, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00615.x
- Article
13
- Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Education, 2008, v. 36, n. 6, p. 440, doi. 10.1002/bmb.20237
- Article
15
- UMKC Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
16
- Health Education & Behavior, 2005, v. 32, n. 5, p. 676, doi. 10.1177/1090198105278825
- Bowen, Deborah J.;
- Battuello, Kathryn M.;
- Raats, Monique
- Article
17
- Texas Law Review, 2013, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1051
- Article
19
- Medical Laboratory Observer (MLO), 2000, v. 32, n. 4, p. 8
- Article
20
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 3, p. 563
- Article
23
- American Nurse, 2009, v. 41, n. 3, p. 14
- Article
24
- Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 6, p. 2037
- Article
25
- Boston University Law Review, 2012, v. 92, n. 2, p. 733
- Article
26
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2021, v. 53, n. 1, p. 367
- Article
27
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2011, v. 43, n. 3, p. 791
- Article
28
- Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2020, v. 22, p. 159
- Article
29
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2009, v. 56, n. 1, p. 13, doi. 10.1353/dss.0.0022
- Article
30
- 2013
- Blankfein-Tabachnick, David H.
- Essay
31
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2014, v. 24, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
32
- Journal of Clinical Sexology, 2020, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77
- Article
33
- 2002
- Salter, Brian;
- Jones, Mavis
- review
34
- Canadian Journal of Communication, 2007, v. 32, n. 3/4, p. 613, doi. 10.22230/cjc.2007v32n3a1972
- Article
35
- Loyola Law Review, 2013, v. 59, n. 1, p. 157
- Article
36
- UCLA Journal of Law & Technology, 2007, v. 11, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
37
- Vniversitas, 2017, v. 66, n. 135, p. 193, doi. 10.11144/Javeriana.vj135.edgb
- Gutiérrez-Prieto, Hernando
- Article
38
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2007, v. 12, n. 1, p. 45
- Article
39
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2013, v. 70, n. 2, p. 1443
- Article
40
- Bio-IT World, 2008, v. 7, n. 6, p. 11
- Article
41
- Bio-IT World, 2003, v. 2, n. 11, p. 22
- Article
42
- Bio-IT World, 2003, v. 2, n. 11, p. 22
- Article
43
- University of the Pacific Law Review, 2018, v. 49, n. 2, p. 309
- Article
44
- Parliamentarian, 2017, v. 98, n. 2, p. 170
- Article
45
- International Journal of Environmental Studies, 1978, v. 12, n. 4, p. 257, doi. 10.1080/00207237808709790
- Article
46
- Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2013, v. 39, n. 2, p. 282
- Article
50
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2013, v. 79, n. 1, p. 175
- Article