Works matching DE "GARCETTI v. Ceballos"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 112, n. 1, p. 111
- Article
2
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 5, p. 759
- Article
3
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 905
- Article
4
- Communication Law & Policy, 2010, v. 15, n. 2, p. 175, doi. 10.1080/10811681003666737
- Article
5
- Idaho Law Review, 2015, v. 51, n. 2, p. 513
- Article
6
- Cornell Law Review, 2014, v. 100, n. 1, p. 243
- Article
7
- Creighton Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 3, p. 749
- Article
8
- Public Administration Review, 2007, v. 67, n. 4, p. 662, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00751.x
- Article
9
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2016, v. 91, n. 2, p. 709
- Article
10
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1205
- Article
11
- Capital University Law Review, 2012, v. 40, n. 1, p. 265
- Article
12
- Texas Law Review, 2013, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1253
- Article
13
- Illinois Public Employee Relations Report, 2007, v. 24, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
14
- Illinois Public Employee Relations Report, 2007, v. 24, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
15
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2010, v. 46, n. 3, p. 687
- Article
16
- Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2012, v. 32, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1177/0734371X11421494
- Article
17
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 4, p. 983
- Article
18
- Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, 2015, v. 2015, n. 1, p. 203
- Article
19
- Touro Law Review, 2010, v. 26, n. 2, p. 531
- Article
20
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2018, v. 83, n. 2, p. 579
- Article
21
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2012, v. 77, n. 4, p. 1329
- Article
22
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2007, v. 30, n. 3, p. 1047
- Article
23
- Western New England Law Review, 2011, v. 33, n. 2, p. 623
- Article
24
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2011, v. 21, n. 2, p. 259
- Article
25
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2008, v. 12, n. 1, p. 233
- Article
26
- Journal of Law & Education, 2014, v. 43, n. 2, p. 147
- ELKIND, STEPHEN;
- KAUFFMAN, PETER
- Article
27
- Journal of Law & Education, 2010, v. 39, n. 4, p. 541
- Article
28
- Journal of Law & Education, 2009, v. 38, n. 2, p. 321
- Article
29
- Labor Law Journal, 2014, v. 65, n. 4, p. 189
- Article
30
- Journal of College & University Law, 2014, v. 40, n. 1, p. 115
- NUGENT, BRIDGET R.;
- FLOOD, JULEE T.
- Article
31
- Journal of College & University Law, 2013, v. 39, n. 2, p. 405
- Article
32
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2016, v. 46, n. 2, p. 565
- Article
33
- Missouri Law Review, 2012, v. 77, n. 3, p. 805
- Article
34
- Minnesota Law Review, 2010, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1202
- Beckstrom, Darryn Cathryn
- Article
37
- Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 2008, v. 29, n. 1, p. 175
- Article
38
- Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 2006, v. 27, n. 2, p. 537
- Article
39
- ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 2010, v. 25, n. 3, p. 509
- Article
40
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2020, v. 38, n. 2, p. 325
- Article
41
- Journal of Philosophy & History of Education, 2022, v. 72, p. 23
- Duemer, Lee S.;
- Gregory, Michelle
- Article
42
- Academic Questions, 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 54, doi. 10.1007/s12129-015-9469-0
- Article
43
- Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 3, p. 777
- Article
44
- Teachers College Record, 2017, v. 119, n. 6, p. 1, doi. 10.1177/016146811711900607
- WASSERMAN, LEWIS M.;
- CONNOLLY, JOHN P.
- Article
45
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2021, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
46
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, v. 80, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
47
- Democratic Communiqué, 2016, v. 27, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
48
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 3, p. 783
- Article
49
- Seattle University Law Review, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
50
- Georgia Law Review, 2021, v. 55, n. 2, p. 935
- Article