LETHAL REJECTION: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ASTONISHING PLUNGE IN DEATH SENTENCES IN THE UNITED STATES FROM THEIR POST-FURMAN PEAK.
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2017, v. 81, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "FURMAN v. Georgia"
Results: 72
1
2
Death in Dallas: Sentencing patterns of pre-Furman capital offenders.
- Published in:
- Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2020, v. 18, n. 2, p. 146, doi. 10.1080/15377938.2020.1729921
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
The Troy Davis Effect: Does Information on Wrongful Convictions Affect Death Penalty Opinions?
- Published in:
- Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2015, v. 13, n. 2, p. 111, doi. 10.1080/15377938.2014.936643
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Capital Punishment on Trial: Furman v. Georgia and the Death Penalty in Modern America.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
5
Death by Stereotype: Race, Ethnicity, and California's Failure to Implement Furman's Narrowing Requirement.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2019, v. 66, n. 6, p. 1394
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
GETTING TO DEATH: RACE AND THE PATHS OF CAPITAL CASES AFTER FURMAN.
- Published in:
- Cornell Law Review, 2022, v. 107, n. 6, p. 1565
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
OUR BROKEN DEATH PENALTY.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Speech
8
PROHIBITING THE EXECUTION OF THE MENTALLY RETARDED.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2002, v. 53, n. 1, p. 171
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
MENTAL HEALTH EVIDENCE AND THE CAPITAL DEFENSE FUNCTION: PREVAILING NORMS.
- Published in:
- UMKC Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 2, p. 407
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Waking the Furman Giant.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 981
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
LESSONS FOR LAW REFORM FROM THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.
- Published in:
- Southern California Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 3, p. 733
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
The History and Future of Capital Punishment in the United States.
- Published in:
- San Diego Law Review, 2017, v. 54, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
A REVISIONIST VIEW OF JOURNALIST'S PRIVILEGE: JUSTICE POWELL, BRANZBURG AND THE "PROPER BALANCE".
- Published in:
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2016, v. 34, n. 1, p. 113
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
INSTITUTIONAL AND POSTRELEASE BEHAVIOR OF FURMAN-COMMUTED INMATES IN TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Criminology, 1988, v. 26, n. 4, p. 677, doi. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1988.tb00859.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
What One Hand Giveth, The Other Taketh Away: How Future Dangerousness Corrupts Guilt Verdicts and Produces Premature Punishment Decisions in Capital Cases.
- Published in:
- Pace Law Review, 2012, v. 32, n. 2, p. 447, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1807
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
RACIAL EXCLUSION AND DEATH PENALTY JURIES: CAN DEATH PENALTY JURIES EVER BE REPRESENTATIVE?
- Published in:
- Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 27, n. 2, p. 147
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
CHALLENGING THE DEATH PENALTY WITH STATISTICS: FURMAN, McCLESKEY, AND A SINGLE COUNTY CASE STUDY.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2013, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1227
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
A Rough Form of Justice: Constitutional Boundaries on Capital Punishment Under the UCMJ.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 2019, v. 97, n. 6, p. 1163
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Furman at 45: Constitutional Challenges from California's Failure to (Again) Narrow Death Eligibility.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2019, v. 16, n. 4, p. 693, doi. 10.1111/jels.12234
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
WEIGHING DEATH: IS DEATH PENALTY ELIGIBILITY "ESPECIALLY HEINOUS, CRUEL OR DEPRAVED"?
- Published in:
- Arizona Law Review, 2016, v. 58, n. 2, p. 511
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Repudiating the Narrowing Rule in Capital Sentencing.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 5, p. 1477
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Substance and Procedure in the Reform of Criminal Sentencing.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
23
THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN INTEREST IN HIGHER LAW IN THE SUPREME COURT: JUSTICES MARSHALL AND THOMAS.
- Published in:
- Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 2017, v. 31, n. 1, p. 289
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Advocacy as an Exercise in Virtue: Lawyering, Bad Facts, and Furman's High-Stakes Dilemma.
- Published in:
- Mercer Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 2, p. 425
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
TRYING TO GET IT RIGHT--OHIO, FROM THE EIGHTIES TO THE TEENS.
- Published in:
- Hofstra Law Review, 2015, v. 43, n. 3, p. 783
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
HURRICANE FLORIDA: THE HOT AND COLD FRONTS OF AMERICA'S MOST ACTIVE DEATH ROW.
- Published in:
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2020, v. 51, n. 3, p. 935
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Mitigation Evidence and the Ethical Role of a Defense Attorney in a Capital Case.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Ethics, 2017, v. 36, n. 1, p. 97, doi. 10.1080/0731129X.2017.1305591
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
‘Trop de Justice’: Race, US Constitutional Law and the Administration of Death.
- Published in:
- Parallax, 2016, v. 22, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1080/13534645.2015.1135518
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
ARBITRARY DEATH: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF MITIGATION.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 3, p. 581
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
A LOST CHAPTER IN DEATH PENALTY HISTORY: FURMAN V. GEORGIA, ALBERT CAMUS, AND THE NORMATIVE CHALLENGE TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2022, v. 49, n. 2, p. 119
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
REDUCING THE DANGERS OF FUTURE DANGEROUSNESS TESTIMONY: APPLYING THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE TO CAPITAL SENTENCING.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 3, p. 1047
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
THE TRUE LEGACY OF ATKINS AND ROPER: THE UNRELIABILITY PRINCIPLE, MENTALLY ILL DEFENDANTS, AND THE DEATH PENALTY'S UNRAVELING.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 487
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
PROCEDURAL PROPORTIONALITY.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2015, v. 22, n. 2, p. 259
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
NOTHING IS CERTAIN BUT DEATH: WHY FUTURE DANGEROUSNESS MANDATES ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY.
- Published in:
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2016, v. 20, n. 3, p. 857
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
From Backlash to Backtrack: How the Supreme Court Reneged on the Promise of Furman v Georgia.
- Published in:
- law&history, 2022, v. 9, n. 1, p. 158
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
The Death Penalty and Mass Incarceration: Convergences and Divergences.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 41, n. 2, p. 189
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
A Reflection on Furman.
- Published in:
- 2007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
38
Death By Discretion: Who Decides Who Lives and Dies in the United States of America?
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2005, v. 32, n. 3, p. 381
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
THE DEATH PENALTY AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2016, v. 111, n. 1, p. 275
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
STRICT SCRUTINY UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Florida State University Law Review, 2013, v. 40, n. 4, p. 853
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
JUSTICE VS. MERCY IN THE LAW OF HOMICIDE: THE CONTEST BETWEEN RULE-OF-LAW VALUES AND DISCRETIONARY LENIENCY FROM COMMON LAW TO CODIFICATION TO CONSTITUTION.
- Published in:
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS.
- Published in:
- Social Policy, 2010, v. 39, n. 4, p. 11
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Current issues involving lethal injection.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2008, v. 21, n. 4, p. 271, doi. 10.1080/14786010802554071
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Supreme Convolution: What the Capital Cases Teach Us About Supreme Court Decision-Making.
- Published in:
- New England Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 4, p. 711
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND THE DEATH PENALTY: THE STRUGGLE.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1986, v. 10, n. 2, p. 178, doi. 10.1007/BF02887469
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND THE DEATH PENALTY SINCE FURMAN: THE SETTLEMENT OF BASIC ISSUES.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1984, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1007/BF03373752
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Capital Punishment: The Great American Paradox.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 369
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
The Coming Federalism Battle in the War over the Death Penalty.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 309
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Death Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
IMPOSE AN IMMEDIATE MORATORIUM ON EXECUTIONS.
- Published in:
- Criminology & Public Policy, 2007, v. 6, n. 4, p. 641, doi. 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00462.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article