Works matching DE "FRIVOLOUS suits (Civil procedure)"
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2017, v. 115, n. 5, p. 639, doi. 10.36644/mlr.115.5.retaliatory
- Article
2
- Indiana Law Journal, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1191
- Article
3
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2012, v. 34, n. 2, p. 365, doi. 10.1007/s10657-010-9177-8
- Article
4
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2020, v. 36, n. 2, p. 343, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewz023
- Article
5
- Review of Litigation, 2018, v. 36, n. 4, p. 711
- Article
6
- Review of Litigation, 2013, v. 3.2, n. 2, p. 299
- Article
7
- Review of Litigation, 2004, v. 23, n. 1, p. 47
- Article
8
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 3, p. 517
- Article
9
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 4, p. 1139
- Article
10
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 3, p. 833
- Article
11
- Communication Law & Policy, 2014, v. 19, n. 2, p. 211, doi. 10.1080/10811680.2014.898528
- Article
12
- Vermont Law Review, 2009, v. 34, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
13
- Idaho Law Review, 2016, v. 52, n. 2, p. 583
- Article
14
- American Bar Association Journal, 1982, v. 68, n. 6, p. 660
- Article
15
- American Bar Association Journal, 1980, v. 66, n. 6, p. 712
- Article
16
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 6, p. 892
- Article
17
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 1, p. 25
- Article
18
- Florida Bar Journal, 2000, v. 74, n. 6, p. 71
- Article
19
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1997, v. 145, n. 3, p. 519, doi. 10.2307/3312603
- Article
20
- George Washington Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 2, p. 587
- Article
21
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2010, v. 61, n. 1, p. 143
- Article
22
- Business & Society Review (00453609), 1989, n. 68
- Article
23
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2010, v. 20, n. 2, p. 449
- Article
24
- Griffith Law Review, 2018, v. 27, n. 4, p. 453, doi. 10.1080/10383441.2018.1584346
- Article
25
- Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, v. 36, n. 5, p. 565, doi. 10.1007/s10961-010-9200-9
- Article
26
- Monthly Labor Review, 1978, v. 101, n. 3, p. 49
- Article
27
- Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 2020, v. 44, n. 2/3, p. 61
- MATERA, PIERLUIGI;
- SBARBARO, FERRUCCIO M.
- Article
28
- California Law Review, 1966, v. 54, n. 4, p. 1769, doi. 10.2307/3479400
- Article
29
- Strategic Finance, 2001, v. 82, n. 12, p. 88
- Article
30
- Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 2014, v. 17, n. 5, p. 1
- Article
32
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2013, v. 70, n. 6, p. 12
- Article
33
- Berichte zur Wissenschafts-Geschichte, 2014, v. 37, n. 4, p. 351, doi. 10.1002/bewi.201401694
- Article
34
- Nature, 2015, v. 521, n. 7552, p. 159, doi. 10.1038/521259b
- Article
35
- Alternative Law Journal, 2018, v. 43, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1177/1037969X17748434
- Article
36
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2021, v. 54, n. 2, p. 623
- Shine Sean Tu;
- Stump, Nicholas F.
- Article
37
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2021, v. 69, n. 4, p. 785
- Article
38
- Hofstra Law Review, 2016, v. 45, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
39
- History of Psychiatry, 2015, v. 26, n. 1, p. 36, doi. 10.1177/0957154X14542728
- Article
40
- History of Psychiatry, 2014, v. 25, n. 3, p. 299, doi. 10.1177/0957154X14530816
- Article
41
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2020, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1051
- Article
42
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2022, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1459
- Article
43
- Columbia Law Review, 2007, v. 107, n. 4, p. 949
- Broderick, Christina Orsini
- Article
44
- Washington University Law Review, 2015, v. 93, n. 2, p. 453
- Article
45
- Washington University Law Review, 2015, v. 93, n. 2, p. 335
- Kaufman, Michael J.;
- Wunderlich, John M.
- Article
46
- Utah Bar Journal, 2019, v. 32, n. 6, p. 48
- Article
47
- Utah Bar Journal, 2018, v. 31, n. 5, p. 56
- Call, Keith A.;
- Kordslemon, Taylor P.
- Article
48
- Tax Lawyer, 2016, v. 70, n. 1, p. 403
- Article
49
- Otago Law Review, 2011, v. 12, n. 3, p. 473
- Article
50
- Indiana Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 4, p. 1316, doi. 10.18060/4806.01126
- KRUSE, PAUL S.;
- MORRIS, LARRY;
- DEWEESE, J. MICHAEL
- Article