THE SUPREME ASSIMILATION OF PATENT LAW.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 114, n. 8, p. 1413
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "EBAY Inc. v. MercExchange LLC"
Results: 63
1
2
Taking antitrust to patent school: The instance of pay-for-delay settlements.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
3
PATENT LAW: FOUR FACTORS TO INJUNCTIONS IN THE WAKE OF eBAY, eBAY, Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 126 S. Ct. 1837 (2006).
- Published in:
- Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 2007, v. 12, n. 1, p. 135
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
"TROLL" CHECK? A PROPOSAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF PATENT LITIGATION.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1775
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
FIVE SOLUTIONS TO THE REMS PATENT PROBLEM.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1661
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Senior Policy Fellow, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law, Washington, DC.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2017, v. 36, n. 2, p. 335
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Mining the Patent Thicket: The Supreme Court's Rejection of the Automatic Injunction Rule in eBay v. MercExchange.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2007, v. 26, n. 1, p. 119
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
eBay v. MercExchange and Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics.
- Published in:
- 2008
- By:
- Publication type:
- Proceeding
9
The Public Interest Inquiry for Permanent Injunctions or Exclusion Orders: Shedding the Myopic Lens.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2015, v. 17, n. 3, p. 751
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
IMPLEMENTING THE "ADEQUATE REMEDY AT LAW" FOR ONGOING PATENT INFRINGEMENT AFTER EBA V V. MERCEXCHANGE.
- Published in:
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 51, n. 2, p. 163
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
RULES AND STANDARDS IN COPYRIGHT.
- Published in:
- Houston Law Review, 2014, v. 52, n. 2, p. 583
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
THE "TRAGEDY OF THE ANTICOMMONS" FALLACY: A LAW AND ECONOMICS ANALYSIS OF PATENT THICKETS AND FRAND LICENSING.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1489, doi. 10.15779/Z38RR1PM7N
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
HAS THE ACADEMY LED PATENT LAW ASTRAY?
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1313, doi. 10.15779/Z388P5V91H
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
EBAY'SEFFECT ON COPYRIGHT INJUNCTIONS: WHEN PROPERTY RULES GIVE WAY TO LIABILITY RULES.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 1, p. 405
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE POST-EBAY WORLD.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2008, v. 23, n. 1, p. 193
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
THE AFTERMATH OF EBAY: PREDICTING WHEN DISTRICT COURTS WILL GRANT PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS IN PATENT CASES.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2007, v. 22, n. 1, p. 67
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
MERCEXCHANGE, LLC v. EBAY, INC.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2006, v. 21, n. 1, p. 177
- Publication type:
- Article
18
THE RIGHT NOT TO USE IN PROPERTY AND PATENT LAW.
- Published in:
- Cornell Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 6, p. 1437
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
The International Trade Commission and the Nonpracticing Entity: Reviving the Injury Requirement for Domestic Industries Based on Licensing.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
20
THE TRADITIONAL BURDENS FOR FINAL INJUNCTIONS IN PATENT CASES C.1789 AND SOME MODERN IMPLICATIONS.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2020, v. 71, n. 2, p. 403
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
SALINGER AND EBAY: WHEN EQUITABLE CONSIDERATIONS UNDERMINE EXCLUSIVITY.
- Published in:
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2011, v. 21, n. 2, p. 323
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Physicalism and Patent Theory.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1543
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
The Supreme Court and the New Equity.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 4, p. 997
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
On Cowbells in Rock Anthems (and Property in IP): A Review of Justifying Intellectual Property.
- Published in:
- San Diego Law Review, 2012, v. 49, n. 4, p. 1033
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
PATENT HOLDUP, THE ITC, AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
- Published in:
- Cornell Law Review, 2012, v. 98, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
'VACATION" AT THE FARM: WHY COURTS SHOULD NOT EXTEND "REMAND WITHOUT VACATION" TO ENVIRONMENTAL DEREGULATION.
- Published in:
- Cornell Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 2, p. 405
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Counter-IP Conspiracies: Patent Alienability and the Sherman Antitrust Act.
- Published in:
- University of Miami Law Review, 2017, v. 71, n. 3, p. 758
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
The Patent System At a Crossroads.
- Published in:
- Regulation, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 44
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Specific Performance: A Maverick Remedy Post-eBay and Winter.
- Published in:
- Franchise Law Journal, 2014, v. 34, n. 2, p. 199
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
WHAT'S THE [IRREPARABLE] HARM?: INCENTIVIZING CREATIVITY THROUGH PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS IN COPYRIGHT LAW.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2017, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1579
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
The Irreparably Harmed Presumption? Why the Presumption of Irreparable Harm in Trademark Law Will Survive eBay and Winter.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 2, p. 535
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
The Continuing Vitality of the Presumption of Irreparable Harm in Copyright Cases.
- Published in:
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 15, n. 1, p. 257
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Raising the Bar and the Public Interest: On Prior Restraints, "Traditional Contours," and Constitutionalizing Preliminary Injunctions in Copyright Law.
- Published in:
- Virginia Sports & Entertainment Law Journal, 2011, v. 10, n. 2, p. 323
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Equitable concerns of ebay v Mercexchange: Did the Supreme Court successfully balance patent protection against patent trolls?
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2007, v. 12, n. 3, p. 362
- Publication type:
- Article
35
EFS asks US Supreme Court to consider critical free-speech implications.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2006, v. 11, n. 2, p. 156
- Publication type:
- Article
36
The Property Rights Movement's Embrace of Intellectual Property: True Love or Doomed Relationship?
- Published in:
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2007, v. 34, n. 2, p. 713
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Temporary Restraining Orders to Enforce Intellectual Property Rights at Trade Shows: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY.
- Published in:
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2018, v. 83, n. 4, p. 1345
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Ongoing Royalties in Patent Cases After eBay: An Empirical Assessment and Proposed Framework.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2015, v. 23, n. 3, p. 203
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Permanent Injunctions After eBay v. MercExchange: The Year in Review.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2007, v. 15, n. 3, p. 417
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Time-Varying Compulsory License: Facilitating License Negotiation for Efficient Post-Verdict Patent Infringement.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2008, v. 16, n. 3, p. 427
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Who Took My IP?--Defending the Availability of Injunctive Relief for Patent Owners.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2008, v. 16, n. 2, p. 187
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
THE SUPREME COURT'S ACCIDENTAL REVOLUTION? THE TEST FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2012, v. 112, n. 2, p. 203
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Patent Remedies<sup>†</sup>.
- Published in:
- American Economic Review, 2016, v. 106, n. 5, p. 198, doi. 10.1257/aer.p20161094
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
THE CONCEPTUAL RELATION BETWEEN IP RIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENT REMEDIES.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2015, v. 22, n. 4, p. 825
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
HOW THE GOOGLE CONSENT ORDER ALTERS THE PROCESS AND OUTCOMES OF FRAND BARGAINING.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
46
THE SUPREME COURT'S UNREMARKABLE DECISION IN EBAY INC. V. MERCEXCHANGE, L.L.C.
- Published in:
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2010, v. 14, n. 2, p. 597
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
WHAT HATH EBAY V. MERCEXCHANGE WROUGHT?
- Published in:
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2010, v. 14, n. 2, p. 555
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
SOME OPEN QUESTIONS ABOUT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REMEDIES.
- Published in:
- 2010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
49
DOING EQUITY IN BANKRUPTCY.
- Published in:
- Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2017, v. 34, n. 1, p. 13
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
REASONABLE ROYALTY PATENT INFRINGEMENT DAMAGES: A PROPOSAL FOR MORE PREDICTABLE, RELIABLE, AND REVIEWABLE STANDARDS OF ADMISSIBILITY AND PROOF FOR DETERMINING A REASONABLE ROYALTY.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 1023, doi. 10.18060/4806.0017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article