DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND HUNG JURIES: NO MANIFEST NECESSITY FOR MANIFEST NECESSITY.
- Published in:
- Regent University Law Review, 2024, v. 37, n. 2, p. 361
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "DOUBLE jeopardy"
Results: 254
1
2
Constitutional Double Standards: The Unintended Consequences of Reducing Police Presence.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2023, v. 91, n. 4, p. 817
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Where did the extra NHS money really go?
- Published in:
- British Journal of Healthcare Management, 2007, v. 13, n. 3, p. 73, doi. 10.12968/bjhc.2007.13.3.24235
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
JUVENILE JUSTICE IN DOUBLE JEOPARDY: THE DISTANCED COMMUNITY AND VENGEFUL RETRIBUTION.
- Published in:
- 1991
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
5
Double Jeopardy: Child Maltreatment and Mental Retardation.
- Published in:
- Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 1990, v. 7, n. 6, p. 487, doi. 10.1007/BF00756079
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
`Reverse Rico' double jeopardy protection under United...
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1991, v. 1991, n. 2, p. 1107
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
CASE NOTE ON BUI VDPP (CTM) - THE HIGH COURT CONSIDERS DOUBLE JEOPARDY IN SENTENCING APPEALS.
- Published in:
- University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review, 2012, v. 14, p. 187
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
ANSWER ME OR GO TO JAIL: WHY COURT ORDERED POLYGRAPH TESTING TO TREAT PROBATIONERS VIOLATES THE FIFTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2013, v. 21, n. 2, p. 455
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
WIGS, SKELETONS, BIBS, BANDS, AND BUNDLES: AN ALBERTAN BARRISTER DECIPHERS THE ENGLISH COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION).
- Published in:
- Alberta Law Review, 2014, v. 52, n. 1, p. 167, doi. 10.29173/alr18
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Retrying the Acquitted in England Part II: The Exception to the Rule Against Double Jeopardy for "Tainted Acquittals".
- Published in:
- San Diego International Law Journal, 2008, v. 9, n. 2, p. 217
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Retrying the Acquitted in England, Part I: The Exception to the Rule Against Double Jeopardy for "New and Compelling Evidence".
- Published in:
- San Diego International Law Journal, 2007, v. 8, n. 2, p. 387
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
SOLVING THE SEXTORTION PUZZLE: PIECING TOGETHER A MODEL STATE SEXTORTION STATUTE.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 761
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Double jeopardy - concurrent lung abscess and pleural empyema.
- Published in:
- QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2016, v. 109, n. 8, p. 545, doi. 10.1093/qjmed/hcw078
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Noticeboard.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2016, v. 20, n. 1, p. 83, doi. 10.1177/1365712715623225
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Noticeboard.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2010, v. 14, n. 3, p. 274, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2010.14.3.359
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
ARTICULACIÓN DE LOS MECANISMOS PUNITIVOS EN CASO DE ACCIDENTE DE TRABAJO. ANÁLISIS DE LA JURISPRUDENCIA RECIENTE SOBRE EL PRINCIPIO NON BIS IN ÍDEM.
- Published in:
- Revista Jurídica de la Universidad Autonóma de Madrid, 2014, n. 30, p. 287
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
UNIÓN EUROPEA.
- Published in:
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2018, n. 48, p. 313
- Publication type:
- Article
18
UNIÓN EUROPEA.
- Published in:
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2014, n. 38, p. 276
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Using Polarisation to Reveal Systematic Deviations in Dirichlet Loyalty Estimation.
- Published in:
- Marketing Bulletin, 2009, v. 20, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Science review in research ethics committees: Double jeopardy?
- Published in:
- Research Ethics, 2014, v. 10, n. 4, p. 227, doi. 10.1177/1747016114552340
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Double Jeopardy: Adolescent Offenders with Mental Disorders.
- Published in:
- 2007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
22
Sextuple Jeopardy: American Public Media's In the Dark.
- Published in:
- American Historical Review, 2022, v. 127, n. 1, p. 418, doi. 10.1093/ahr/rhac137
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
‘Having to adopt children twice is not in the children's best interests’: a reflective case study analysis of intercountry adoption policy in the UK.
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Case Study
24
Dividing Crime, Multiplying Punishments.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1955
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
On the Hook: Venue, Vicinage, and Double Jeopardy's Relationship with Modern Data Crimes.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2024, v. 89, n. 2, p. 657
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Successive Prosecutions and Compound Criminal Statutes: A Functional Test.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 1998, v. 77, n. 2, p. 333
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Defining the "Sovereign" in Dual Sovereignty: Does the Protection Against Double Jeopardy Bar Successive Prosecutions in National and International Courts.
- Published in:
- Cornell International Law Journal, 2014, v. 47, n. 3, p. 767
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
INDIANA CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS: A QUIET YEAR.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1116
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
INDIANA CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS: EVOLUTION ON INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2009, v. 42, n. 4, p. 909
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
SINGLED OUT.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2016, v. 76, n. 1, p. 122
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
RESETTING THE BASELINE OF OWNERSHIP: TAKINGS AND INVESTOR EXPECTATIONS AFTER THE BAILOUTS.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2016, v. 75, n. 3, p. 722
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Protecting the Common Good with the Required Records Doctrine.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2022, v. 51, n. 3, p. 393
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
PROCEDURAL RIGHTS.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
34
The Past, Present and Future of the Ne Bis In Idem Dialogue between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights: The Cases of Menci, Garlsson and Di Puma.
- Published in:
- Review of European Administrative Law, 2018, v. 11, n. 2, p. 55, doi. 10.7590/187479818X15481611819868
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Transnational Law Enforcement in the European Union and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle.
- Published in:
- Review of European Administrative Law, 2011, v. 4, n. 2, p. 5, doi. 10.7590/REAL_2011_02_02
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
When Market Abuse Rules Violate Human Rights: Grande Stevens v. Italy and the Different Approaches to Double Jeopardy in Europe and the US.
- Published in:
- European Business Organization Law Review, 2015, v. 16, n. 1, p. 145, doi. 10.1007/s40804-015-0002-2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
JUDICIAL SENTENCING ERROR AND THE CONSTITUTION.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 5, p. 1617
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Damned Under Many Headings: The Problem of Multiple Punishment.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2002, v. 29, n. 2, p. 245
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
A Second Look at Double Jeopardy: Hudson v. United States.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 1998, v. 25, n. 3, p. 631
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
HUNG OUT TO TRY: A RULE 29 REVISION TO STOP HUNG JURY RETRIALS.
- Published in:
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2024, v. 118, n. 4, p. 1139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Twice Punished: Perceived Procedural Fairness and Legitimacy of Monetary Sanctions.
- Published in:
- Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 2021, v. 37, n. 1, p. 88, doi. 10.1177/1043986220965035
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
"I WOULD NOT BE CONVICTED BY A JURY OF MY PEERS" (BECAUSE THE JUDGE ERRONEOUSLY GRANTED MY MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL): EVANS v. MICHIGAN AND THE FUTURE OF THE PRE-VERDICT JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL.
- Published in:
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2016, v. 47, n. 2, p. 279
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
"Public Use" or Public Abuse? A New Test for Public Use in Light of Kelo.
- Published in:
- Seattle University Law Review, 2020, v. 44, n. 1, p. 149
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
A Deal Is a Deal: Plea Bargains and Double Jeopardy After Ohio v. Johnson.
- Published in:
- Seattle University Law Review, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 285
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Corporate Criminal Prosecutions and Double Jeopardy.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Business Law Journal, 2019, v. 16, n. 1, p. 205
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Passwords, Profiles, and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination" Facebook and the Fifth Amendment.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2012, v. 65, n. 1, p. 133
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Supreme Court Report.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1982, v. 68, n. 8, p. 1000
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Double jeopardy...merger of offenses.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1980, v. 66, n. 6, p. 775
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
No Double Jeopardy in Juvenile Court Scheme.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 9, p. 1425
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Justices redefine double jeopardy.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 8, p. 1221
- Publication type:
- Article