GINA and Preemployment Criminal Background Checks.
- Published in:
- 2010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
Works matching DE "DNA fingerprinting laws"
Results: 43
1
2
ERRORS IN MISDEMEANOR ADJUDICATION.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2018, v. 98, n. 3, p. 999
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Regulations Not In Place.
- Published in:
- Forensic Examiner, 1994, v. 3, n. 9, p. 5
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
DNA fingerprinting: The Virginia approach.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 1994, v. 35, n. 2, p. 767
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
MARYLAND V. KING AND THE ROAD ALREADY TRAVELED: HOW THE UNITED KINGDOM TRIED--AND FAILED--TO BALANCE STATE INTERESTS WITH PRIVACY RIGHTS.
- Published in:
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2013, v. 42, n. 1, p. 157
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Retention of Offender DNA Samples Necessary to Ensure and Monitor Quality of Forensic DNA Efforts: Appropriate Safeguards Exist to Protect the DNA Samples from Misuse.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2006, v. 34, n. 2, p. 380, doi. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00043.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
A Right To Rational Juries? How Jury Instructions Create The "Bionic Juror" In Criminal Proceedings Involving DNA Match Evidence.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 6, p. 1807, doi. 10.15779/Z38183426H
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
A "LENGTHY, UNCERTAIN, AND EXPENSIVE PROCESS": A COMPARISON OF TYPES OF EXPUNGEMENT FROM DNA DATABASES OF ARRESTEES.
- Published in:
- Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2013, v. 39, n. 2, p. 282
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
DNA evidence in the Australian legal system.
- Published in:
- 2017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
10
Individualization is dead, long live individualization! Reforms of reporting practices for fingerprint analysis in the United States.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2014, v. 13, n. 2, p. 117, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgt014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
FORENSIC FALLACIES AND A FAMOUS JUDGE.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2014, v. 54, n. 3, p. 211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
A BRIEF OF GENETICS, GENOMICS AND FORENSIC SCIENCE RESEARCHERS IN MARYLAND V. KING.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2013, v. 54, n. 1, p. 43
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Genetics, Crime and Justice.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
14
Lawyers and DNA: Issues in Understanding and Challenging the Evidence.
- Published in:
- Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 2012, v. 24, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1080/10345329.2012.12035945
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Tested at Last: How DNA Evidence in Untested Rape Kits Can Identify Offenders and Serial Sexual Assaults.
- Published in:
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2018, v. 33, n. 24, p. 3792, doi. 10.1177/0886260516639585
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Cross-Border Cooperation in the Context of Romania's Accession to the Treaty of Prüm.
- Published in:
- Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica, 2013, v. 9, n. 2, p. 63
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
DNA PROFILING AND THE LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA.
- Published in:
- Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 2011, v. 14, n. 4, p. 171, doi. 10.4314/pelj.v14i4.6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
LETTING INNOCENCE SUFFER: THE NEED FOR DEFENSE ACCESS TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT DNA DATABASE.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2015, v. 36, n. 3, p. 805
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Court of Appeal.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2017, v. 81, n. 4, p. 275, doi. 10.1177/0022018317721641
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
PEOPLE V. BUZA: A STEP IN THE WRONG DIRECTION.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2020, v. 53, n. 2, p. 521
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
LCN DNA: proof beyond reasonable doubt?
- Published in:
- 2008
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
22
Genetics, Crime, and Justice.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
23
Trust, morality and altruism in the donation of biological material: the case of Portugal.
- Published in:
- New Genetics & Society, 2009, v. 28, n. 2, p. 103, doi. 10.1080/14636770902901413
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
The social uses of DNA in the political realm or how politics constructs DNA technology in the fight against crime.
- Published in:
- New Genetics & Society, 2008, v. 27, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1080/14636770701843675
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
23, ME, AND THE POLICE: THE FOURTH AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF FAMILIAL DNA SEARCHING.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2020, v. 30, n. 2, p. 177
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Biolegalidade, imaginário forense e investigação criminal.
- Published in:
- Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 2012, n. 97, p. 61, doi. 10.4000/rccs.4927
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
DO MUDDY WATERS SHIFT BURDENS?
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2017, v. 76, n. 3, p. 629
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Very Big Brother.
- Published in:
- GeneWatch, 2014, v. 27, n. 1, p. 24
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Recent Legal Developments.
- Published in:
- Law Teacher, 2009, v. 43, n. 2, p. 209, doi. 10.1080/03069400903004285
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Collecting DNA From Arrestees: Implementation Lessons.
- Published in:
- National Institute of Justice Journal, 2012, n. 270, p. 18
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
The Case for Testing All Sexual Assault Kits.
- Published in:
- National Institute of Justice Journal, 2012, n. 270, p. 16
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Arrestee Number Two, Who Are You? Suspicionless DNA Testing of Pre-Trial Arrestees and the Fourth Amendment Implications.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 3, p. 755
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
As Though They Were Not Children: DNA Collection from Juveniles.
- Published in:
- Tulane Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 2, p. 435
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: WORKING TOGETHER FOR JUSTICE: UTAH'S EXONERATION AND INNOCENCE ASSISTANCE BILL.
- Published in:
- Utah Law Review, 2008, v. 2008, n. 1, p. 107
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
FORENSICS OR FAUXRENSICS? Ascertaining Accuracy in the Forensic Sciences.
- Published in:
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2017, v. 49, n. 4, p. 1369
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
WHY SO CONTRIVED? FOURTH AMENDMENT BALANCING, PER SE RULES, AND DNA DATABASES AFTER MARYLAND V. KING.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2014, v. 104, n. 3, p. 535
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
DNA Shall Prevail: Postconviction DNA Evidence: An Annotated Bibliography.
- Published in:
- 2006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Bibliography
38
REGULATING DNA LABORATORIES: THE NEW GOLD STANDARD?
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
39
The Effects of Legislation Mandating DNA Testing in Sexual Assault Cases: Results in Texas.
- Published in:
- Violence Against Women, 2020, v. 26, n. 5, p. 417, doi. 10.1177/1077801219838330
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Noticeboard.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2017, v. 21, n. 4, p. 382, doi. 10.1177/1365712717727166
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
POST-CONVICTION ACCESS TO DNA TESTING: WHY MASSACHUSETTS'S 278A STATUTE SHOULD BE THE MODEL FOR THE FUTURE.
- Published in:
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2016, v. 36, n. 2, p. 355
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
DNA PROFILES, COMPUTER SEARCHES, AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Duke Law Journal, 2013, v. 62, n. 4, p. 933
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
SEARCH AND SEIZURE--FOURTH AMENDMENT AND REASONABLENESS: THE MARYLAND DNA COLLECTION ACT ALLOWS PRE-CONVICTION SECURING OF DNA SAMPLES FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES Maryland v. King, 133 S. CT. 1958 (2013).
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2013, v. 89, n. 4, p. 747
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article