Works matching DE "DAUBERT v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc."

Results: 236

Putting Proponents to Their Proof: Evidentiary Rules at Class Certification.

Published in:

George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 606

By:

Mullenix, Linda S.

Publication type:

Article

ADMISSIBILITY OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IN COURTS.

Published in:

Medicine & Law (World Association for Medical Law), 2005, v. 24, n. 2, p. 243

By:

Davies, J.

Publication type:

Article

Neuroimaging as Evidence.

Published in:

American Journal of Bioethics, 2007, v. 7, n. 9, p. 62, doi. 10.1080/15265160701518797

By:

Egan, ErinA.

Publication type:

Article

A misapplication of Daubert: Compton v Subaru of America opens the gate for unreliable and...

Published in:

Brigham Young University Law Review, 1997, v. 1997, n. 2, p. 489

By:

Schofield, Jonathan R.

Publication type:

Article

Applying statistics to the gatekeeping of expert evidence: Introducing the Structured Statistical Judgement (SSJ).

Published in:

2019

By:

Andretta, James R.;
Morgan, Grant B.;
Cantone, Jason A.;
Renbarger, Rachel L.

Publication type:

journal article

THE BRADFORD HILL CRITERIA: THE FORGOTTEN PREDICATE.

Published in:

Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 103

By:

Woodside III, Frank C.;
Davis, Allison G.

Publication type:

Article

RADICALLY REIMAGINING FORENSIC EVIDENCE.

Published in:

Alabama Law Review, 2022, v. 73, n. 4, p. 879

By:

Sinha, Maneka

Publication type:

Article

Judges’ Capacity to Evaluate Psychological and Psychiatric Expert Testimony.

Published in:

Nordic Psychology, 2016, v. 68, n. 3, p. 204, doi. 10.1080/19012276.2015.1125303

By:

Tadei, Alessandro;
Finnilä, Katarina;
Reite, Agnetha;
Antfolk, Jan;
Santtila, Pekka

Publication type:

Article

When Science and the Law Collide: The Legal Implications of Changed Expert Opinions.

Published in:

2013

By:

Chamberlain, Michael

Publication type:

Opinion

US regulations to curb alleged cancer causes are ineffectual and compromised by scientific, constitutional and ethical violations.

Published in:

Archives of Toxicology, 2023, v. 97, n. 6, p. 1813, doi. 10.1007/s00204-022-03429-5

By:

Gori, Gio B.;
Aschner, Michael;
Borgert, Christopher J.;
Cohen, Samuel M.;
Dietrich, Daniel R.;
Galli, Corrado L.;
Greim, Helmut;
Heslop-Harrison, John S.;
Kacew, Sam;
Kaminski, Norbert E.;
Klaunig, James E.;
Marquardt, Hans W.J.;
Pelkonen, Olavi;
Roberts, Ruth;
Savolainen, Kai M.;
Tsatsakis, Aristidis;
Yamazaki, Hiroshi

Publication type:

Article

Genomic Test Results and the Courtroom: The Roles of Experts and Expert Testimony.

Published in:

Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2016, v. 44, n. 1, p. 205, doi. 10.1177/1073110516644211

By:

Ramos, Edward;
Callier, Shawneequa L.;
Swann, Peter B.;
Harvey, Hosea H.

Publication type:

Article

Gatekeeping Trends in Reasonable Royalty Cases.

Published in:

Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2017, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1

By:

Amerson, Drew

Publication type:

Article

Neuropsychological review of records in forensic cases: An AACN best practices paper with international perspectives.

Published in:

Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2025, v. 39, n. 4, p. 839, doi. 10.1080/13854046.2025.2461750

By:

Chafetz, Michael D.;
Sweet, Jerry J.;
Boone, Kyle B.;
Cox, Darcy;
Hall, Vicki;
Kirkwood, Michael W.;
Lafosse, Jose M.;
Merten, Thomas;
Oldenburg, Christian

Publication type:

Article

The "Any Exposure" Causation Theory Moves to the Florida Supreme Court and New York Court of Appeals.

Published in:

Defense Counsel Journal, 2018, v. 85, n. 1, p. 1

By:

Anderson, William L.

Publication type:

Article

Daubert: Trends and Statistics.

Published in:

Defense Counsel Journal, 2018, v. 85, n. 1, p. 1

By:

Watt, Whitney Frazier;
Startsman, Emily Larish

Publication type:

Article

Manning the Daubert Gate: A Defense Primer in Response to Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products.

Published in:

Defense Counsel Journal, 2012, v. 79, n. 2, p. 128

By:

Lasker, Eric

Publication type:

Article

Is there an Expert in the House? Expert Evidence in Insurance Coverage Cases.

Published in:

Defense Counsel Journal, 2007, v. 74, n. 4, p. 307

By:

Newman, Thomas R.

Publication type:

Article

Daubert Now Becomes the Rule in the Rules.

Published in:: Defense Counsel Journal, 2001, v. 68, n. 2, p. 248
Publication type:: Article

From Quantitative Fact to Discursive Practice: Techniques for Asserting the Reliability of Anthropological Knowledge in Expert Testimony.

Published in:: Annals of Anthropological Practice, 2022, v. 46, n. 1, p. 107, doi. 10.1111/napa.12186
Publication type:: Article

REJECTED! ANTITRUST ECONOMISTS AS EXPERT WITNESSES IN THE POST- DAUBERT WORLD.

Published in:

Journal of the History of Economic Thought (Cambridge University Press), 2020, v. 42, n. 2, p. 203, doi. 10.1017/S1053837219000671

By:

Giocoli, Nicola

Publication type:

Article

ADMISSIBILITY OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE UNDER DAUBERT: THE FATAL FLAWS OF 'FALSIFIABILITY' AND 'FALSIFICATION'.

Published in:

Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2016, v. 22, n. 1, p. 21

By:

BILLAUER, BARBARA PFEFFER

Publication type:

Article

Quo Vadis Forensic Neuropsychological Malingering Determinations? Reply to Drs. Bush, Faust, and Jewsbury.

Published in:

Neuropsychology Review, 2023, v. 33, n. 3, p. 653, doi. 10.1007/s11065-023-09606-2

By:

Leonhard, Christoph

Publication type:

Article

EVOLVING SCIENCE MEETS THE STAGNATING APPEALS PROCESS: INTEGRATING DAUBERT INTO THE POST-TRIAL PHASE.

Published in:

University of Baltimore Law Review, 2018, v. 47, n. 2, p. 295

By:

Smith, Jacey

Publication type:

Article

EGADS! PRESERVATION RUN AMOK: A CALL FOR CHANGE TO ARKANSAS'S WAS IT RAISED?, WAS IT DEVELOPED?, WAS IT RULED ON? JURISPRUDENCE.

Published in:

2015

By:

Brooks, Brian G.

Publication type:

Essay

PEDDLING IGNORANCE: A NEW FALSITY STANDARD FOR SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE FRAUD CASES.

Published in:

UMKC Law Review, 2017, v. 86, n. 2, p. 295

By:

Henricksen, Wes E.

Publication type:

Article

EXPERT TESTIMONY ON INTERROGATION AND FALSE CONFESSION.

Published in:

UMKC Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 589

By:

Cutler, Brian;
Findley, Keith A.;
Loney, Danielle

Publication type:

Article

Rigor or Reach? Strictness or Scope?: The Continuing Battle Over the Parameters of The Supreme Court's Daubert/Kumho Reliability/Validation Test for the Admissibility of Expert Testimony.

Published in:

Missouri Law Review, 2024, v. 89, n. 2, p. 615

By:

Imwinkelried, Edward J.

Publication type:

Article

THE DAUBERT DOUBLE STANDARD.

Published in:

Michigan State Law Review, 2021, v. 2021, n. 3, p. 705

By:

Cicchini, Michael D.

Publication type:

Article

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE: CAN THEY BE RECONCILED?

Published in:

Michigan State Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 3, p. 771

By:

Driesen, David M.

Publication type:

Article

What the Daubert Test Deans to a Financial Expert.

Published in:

Value Examiner, 2015, p. 6

By:

Jenkins, Joryn;
Mard, Michael J.

Publication type:

Article

LOST PROFITS SERIES.

Published in:

Value Examiner, 2014, p. 16

By:

Clements, Bruce

Publication type:

Article

Beyond the Witness: Bringing a Process Perspective to Modern Evidence Law.

Published in:

Texas Law Review, 2019, v. 97, n. 6, p. 1077

By:

Cheng, Edward K.;
Nunn, G. Alexander

Publication type:

Article

Expert Testimony and the Quest for Reliability: The Case for a Methodology Questionnaire.

Published in:

Texas Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1055

By:

Chlistunoff, Marta M.

Publication type:

Article

Constructing Evidence and Educating Juries: The Case for Modular, Made-In-Advance Expert Evidence About Eyewitness Identifications and False Confessions.

Published in:

Texas Law Review, 2015, v. 93, n. 7, p. 1811

By:

Mnookin, Jennifer L.

Publication type:

Article

Serviceable Truths: Science for Action in Law and Policy.

Published in:

Texas Law Review, 2015, v. 93, n. 7, p. 1723

By:

Jasanoff, Sheila

Publication type:

Article

Remedying Daubert's Inadequacy in Evaluating the Admissibility of Scientific Models Used in Environmental-Tort Litigation.

Published in:

Texas Law Review, 2008, v. 86, n. 6, p. 1281

By:

Swinehart, Matthew W.

Publication type:

Article

THE HIDDEN DAUBERT FACTOR: HOW JUDGES USE ERROR RATES IN ASSESSING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE.

Published in:

Wisconsin Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 6, p. 1063

By:

MEIXNER, JOHN B.;
DIAMOND, SHARI SEIDMAN

Publication type:

Article

THE CONSENSUS RULE: JUDGES, JURORS, AND ADMISSIBILITY HEARINGS.

Published in:

Villanova Law Review, 2022, v. 67, n. 5, p. 883

By:

EVANS, ROBERT

Publication type:

Article

EMBRACING DEFERENCE.

Published in:

Villanova Law Review, 2022, v. 67, n. 5, p. 855

By:

CHENG, EDWARD K.;
CURRIER, ELODIE O.;
HAMPTON, PAYTON B.

Publication type:

Article

What do pediatric healthcare experts really need to know about Daubert and the rules of evidence?

Published in:

2013

By:

Moreno, Joëlle

Publication type:

Editorial

Judging Public Health Research: Epistemology, Public Health and the Law.

Published in:

American Journal of Bioethics, 2005, v. 5, n. 6, p. 4, doi. 10.1080/15265160500318720

By:

Wynia, MatthewK.

Publication type:

Article

The over‐citation of Daubert in forensic anthropology.

Published in:

Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, v. 69, n. 1, p. 9, doi. 10.1111/1556-4029.15409

By:

Lesciotto, Kate M.;
Christensen, Angi M.

Publication type:

Article

Author's response.

Published in:

Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, v. 69, n. 1, p. 378, doi. 10.1111/1556-4029.15407

By:

Thompson, William C.

Publication type:

Article

BACKFIRE: ABANDONING THE ABUSE OF DISCRETION STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR DAUBERT RULINGS SHOOTS TRIAL COURTS IN THE FOOT.

Published in:

University of Toledo Law Review, 2016, v. 47, n. 2, p. 349

By:

Ryan, Sean

Publication type:

Article

LEE V. SMITH & WESSON CORP.: A PRODUCTS LIABILITY CASE STUDY.

Published in:

University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2016, v. 78, n. 1, p. 117, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2016.426

By:

Salpietro, Francesco G.

Publication type:

Article

A Brief Comment on the Response By Professors Findley and Risinger to My Original Contribution to Professor Risinger's Symposium.

Published in:

Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1229

By:

Imwinkelried, Edward J.

Publication type:

Article

Expert Testimony and the Epistemology of Disagreement.

Published in:

Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1199

By:

Stein, Alex

Publication type:

Article

Refryed Forensics: Screening Expert Testimony in Criminal Cases Through Frye Plus Reliability.

Published in:

Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1161

By:

Epps, JoAnne A.;
Todorow, Kevin

Publication type:

Article

Debunked, Discredited, but Still Defended: Why Prosecutors Resist Challenges to Bad Science and Some Suggestions for Crafting Remedies for Wrongful Conviction Based on Changed Science.

Published in:

Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1139

By:

Orenstein, Aviva

Publication type:

Article

Debunked, Discredited, but Still Defended Revising State Post-Conviction Relief Statutes To Cover Convictions Resting On Subsequently Invalidated Expert Testimony.

Published in:

Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1095

By:

Imwinkelried, Edward J.

Publication type:

Article