Works matching DE "CRUEL %26 unusual punishment"
1
- New York University Law Review, 2015, v. 90, n. 4, p. 1331
- Article
3
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 74, n. 4, p. 1001
- Article
4
- Columbia Law Review, 2020, v. 120, n. 8, p. 2235
- Article
5
- Elder Law Journal, 2014, v. 22, n. 1, p. 175
- Scott Smith, M.;
- Taylor, Laura Anne;
- Wake, Andrew
- Article
6
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2023, p. 231
- Article
7
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 62, n. 2, p. 407
- Article
8
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 61, n. 6, p. 1445
- Article
9
- New York Law School Law Review, 2018, v. 63, n. 2, p. 251
- Article
10
- Widener Law Review, 2021, v. 27, n. 1, p. 91
- Article
11
- Temple Law Review, 2016, v. 88, n. 4, p. 675
- Scott, Elizabeth;
- Grisso, Thomas;
- Levick, Marsha;
- Steinberg, Laurence
- Article
12
- Nevada Law Journal, 2014, v. 14, n. 2, p. 522
- Zydney Mannheimer, Michael J.
- Article
13
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1087
- Article
14
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1053
- Article
15
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1041
- Article
16
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1015
- Article
17
- Cardozo Law Review, 2021, v. 42, n. 6, p. 2651
- Article
18
- Cardozo Law Review, 2014, v. 35, n. 4, p. 1619
- Article
19
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2017, v. 78, n. 2, p. 403
- BERRY III, WILLIAM W.;
- RYAN, MEGHAN J.
- Article
20
- 2015
- Sanggaran, John-Paul;
- Zion, Deborah
- Opinion
21
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 95, n. 3, p. 781
- Article
22
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
23
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
24
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 1, p. 115
- LEVICK, MARSHA;
- SHAH, RIYA SAHA
- Article
25
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 423
- Article
26
- California Law Review, 2012, v. 100, n. 6, p. 1711
- Article
27
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2016, v. 34, n. 2/3, p. 460, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2216
- Chavira, Cynthia;
- Botello, Timothy;
- Lagomasino, Isabel T.
- Article
28
- Feminist Theory, 2017, v. 18, n. 2, p. 137, doi. 10.1177/1464700117700043
- Article
29
- Pace Law Review, 2021, v. 42, n. 1, p. 223
- Article
30
- Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, 2018, v. 33, n. 1, p. 375
- Article
31
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2021, v. 48, n. 3, p. 701
- Article
32
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2018, v. 45, n. 2, p. 437
- Article
33
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2008, v. 35, n. 4, p. 763
- Article
34
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2008, v. 35, n. 4, p. 701
- Article
35
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2012, v. 42, n. 3, p. 497
- Article
36
- Judicature, 2013, v. 96, n. 4, p. 161
- Article
37
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2020, v. 43, n. 1, p. 85
- LARKIN, PAUL J.;
- CANAPARO, GIAN CARLO
- Article
38
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 37, n. 3, p. 1065
- Article
39
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 1, p. 355
- Article
40
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2018, v. 108, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
42
- University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 2014, v. 65, p. 21
- Article
44
- Iowa Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 3, p. 1259
- Article
45
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 100, n. 1, p. 323
- Article
46
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 100, n. 1, p. 93
- Article
47
- Minnesota Law Review, 2022, v. 107, n. 1, p. 475
- Article
48
- Minnesota Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 2/3, p. 421
- Article
49
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2018, v. 51, n. 1, p. 95
- Article
50
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 2, p. 531
- Article