Works matching DE "CRIMINAL law philosophy"
1
- Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminologia, 2010, v. 3, p. 13
- Article
4
- Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 2013, v. 96, n. 2/3, p. 226, doi. 10.1515/mks-2013-962-316
- Article
5
- Liverpool Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 2, p. 79, doi. 10.1007/s10991-019-09226-y
- Article
6
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2018, v. 108, n. 2, p. 305
- Article
7
- Juridical Current, 2009, v. 12, n. 2, p. 129
- Article
8
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2022, v. 89, n. 3, p. 735
- Article
9
- Philosophical Forum, 2015, v. 46, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.1111/phil.12066
- Article
11
- Alabama Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 3, p. 855
- Article
12
- Marquette Law Review, 2016, v. 99, n. 3, p. 541
- Article
13
- Legal Theory, 2013, v. 19, n. 2, p. 124, doi. 10.1017/S1352325213000098
- Article
14
- Revista Científica Guillermo de Ockham, 2011, v. 9, n. 1, p. 55
- Enciso, Yesid Echeverry;
- Marín, Jefferson Jaramillo
- Article
15
- Feminist Theory, 2016, v. 17, n. 2, p. 141, doi. 10.1177/1464700116645324
- Article
16
- Social Research, 2007, v. 74, n. 2, p. 435, doi. 10.1353/sor.2007.0052
- Article
18
- Maryland Law Review, 2012, v. 72, n. 1, p. 156
- Article
19
- Revista de Filosofía (0185-3481), 2020, v. 52, n. 149, p. 84
- Article
20
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2024, v. 44, n. 1, p. 156, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqad029
- Article
21
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2013, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqs028
- Lacey, Nicola;
- Pickard, Hanna
- Article
22
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2009, v. 29, n. 1, p. 169, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqn032
- Article
23
- New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 2015, v. 48, n. 1, p. 129
- Article
24
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2016, v. 20, n. 3, p. 802
- Article
25
- Veritas, 2013, v. 58, n. 2, p. 399, doi. 10.15448/1984-6746.2013.2.13564
- Article
26
- Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 113, n. 4, p. 461
- Article
27
- Crítica, 2012, v. 44, n. 131, p. 3, doi. 10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2012.758
- Article
28
- Social, Political & Legal Philosophy, 2014, v. 3, p. 153
- Article
29
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 119
- Article
30
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 109
- Article
31
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 95
- Pérez Bermejo, Juan Manuel
- Article
32
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 153
- Article
33
- Amicus Journal, 2012, n. 28, p. 18
- Article
35
- Journal of Constitutional History / Giornale di Storia Costituzionale, 2014, n. 27, p. 133
- Article
36
- Journal of Political Philosophy, 2016, v. 24, n. 1, p. 24, doi. 10.1111/jopp.12060
- Article
37
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2020, v. 14, n. 2, p. 189, doi. 10.1007/s11572-019-09502-y
- Article
38
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2018, v. 12, n. 1, p. 185, doi. 10.1007/s11572-017-9416-y
- Article
39
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2017, v. 11, n. 1, p. 143, doi. 10.1007/s11572-014-9329-y
- Article
40
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2016, v. 10, n. 2, p. 297, doi. 10.1007/s11572-014-9332-3
- Article
41
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2015, v. 9, n. 1, p. 73, doi. 10.1007/s11572-013-9292-z
- Article
43
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2014, v. 8, n. 3, p. 619, doi. 10.1007/s11572-013-9226-9
- Article
44
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2014, v. 8, n. 3, p. 635, doi. 10.1007/s11572-013-9229-6
- Article
45
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2014, v. 8, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.1007/s11572-012-9156-y
- Article
46
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2014, v. 8, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1007/s11572-012-9164-y
- Article
47
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2013, v. 7, n. 2, p. 351, doi. 10.1007/s11572-013-9206-0
- Article
48
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2009, v. 3, n. 3, p. 271, doi. 10.1007/s11572-009-9075-8
- Article
49
- Problems / Problemos, 2016, v. 90, p. 20, doi. 10.15388/Problemos.2016.90.10132
- Čepas, Algimantas;
- Dobryninas, Aleksandras
- Article
50
- Estudios de Derecho, 2013, v. 70, n. 155, p. 104
- Article