Works matching DE "CRAWFORD v. Washington"
1
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2014, v. 81, n. 1, p. 11, doi. 10.12690/IADC-14-002
- Frongillo, Thomas C.;
- Simons, Caroline K.;
- Essinger, Jaclyn;
- Knowles, Matthew
- Article
2
- California Law Review, 2022, v. 110, n. 5, p. 1689, doi. 10.15779/Z389P2W69R
- Article
3
- American University Law Review, 2012, v. 61, n. 6, p. 1657
- Article
4
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 1, p. 219
- Article
5
- Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 2015, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
6
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2017, v. 37, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
7
- Family Court Review, 2009, v. 47, n. 1, p. 167, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.00247.x
- Article
8
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2017, v. 107, n. 2, p. 293
- Article
9
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2014, v. 104, n. 2, p. 431
- Article
11
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2012, v. 102, n. 4, p. 1181
- LYON, THOMAS D.;
- DENTE, JULIA A.
- Article
12
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 5, p. 1999
- Article
13
- Creighton Law Review, 2009, v. 43, n. 1, p. 35
- Article
14
- Creighton Law Review, 2005, v. 38, n. 4, p. 999
- Article
15
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, p. 2311
- Article
16
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, p. 2265
- Article
17
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2014, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1931
- Article
18
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1488
- Article
19
- Michigan Law Review, 2005, v. 104, n. 3, p. 599
- Article
20
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2010, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1067
- Article
21
- University of La Verne Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
22
- Review of Litigation, 2005, v. 24, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
23
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 3, p. 923
- Article
24
- Cardozo Law Review, 2015, v. 36, n. 3, p. 1191
- Article
25
- Akron Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1211
- Article
26
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2013, v. 53, n. 2, p. 213
- Article
27
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 122, n. 3, p. 782
- Article
28
- Marquette Law Review, 2006, v. 89, n. 3, p. 625
- Article
29
- Seattle University Law Review, 2011, v. 34, n. 3, p. 857
- Article
30
- DePaul Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 2, p. 449
- Article
31
- Florida Bar Journal, 2006, v. 80, n. 4, p. 10
- Article
32
- Albany Law Review, 2013, v. 76, n. 3, p. 1805
- Article
33
- Albany Law Review, 2008, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1287
- Article
34
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2006, v. 18, n. 4, p. 230, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2006.18.4.230
- Article
35
- Boston University Law Review, 2011, v. 91, n. 2, p. 789
- Article
36
- Western New England Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 3, p. 301
- Article
37
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 3, p. 979
- Article
38
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
39
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 219
- Article
40
- Missouri Law Review, 2011, v. 76, n. 3, p. 895
- Article
41
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2018, v. 23, n. 1, p. 265
- Article
42
- Stanford Law Review, 2009, v. 61, n. 4, p. 923
- Article
43
- Public Health Reports, 2006, v. 121, n. 4, p. 464, doi. 10.1177/003335490612100416
- Article
44
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2005, v. 39, n. 2, p. 257
- Article
45
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2016, v. 21, n. 2, p. 219
- Article
46
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2015, v. 43, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
47
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2014, v. 67, n. 5, p. 1497
- Article
48
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2010, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1793
- Article
49
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2015, v. 17, n. 2, p. 463
- Article
50
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2015, v. 68, n. 2, p. 549
- Article