Confronting Crawford v. Washington in the Lower Courts.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 122, n. 3, p. 782
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "CRAWFORD v. Washington"
Results: 77
1
2
TODAYS CONFRONTATION CLAUSE (AFTER CRAWFORD AND MELENDEZ-DIAZ).
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2009, v. 43, n. 1, p. 35
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
LEGAL CROSSROADS: THE HEARSAY RULE MEETS THE SIXTH AMENDMENT CONFRONTATION CLAUSE IN CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2005, v. 38, n. 4, p. 999
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Originalist Law Reform, Judicial Departmentalism, and Justice Scalia.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, p. 2311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Confronting Crawford: Justice Scalia, the Judicial Method, and the Adjudicative Limits of Originalism.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, p. 2265
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Clogged Conduits: A Defendant's Right to Confront His Translated Statements.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2014, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1931
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
HEARSAY AND CONFRONTATION ISSUES POST-CRAWFORD: THE CHANGING COURSE OF TERRORISM TRIALS.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1488
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
THE CONTENT OF CONFRONTATION.
- Published in:
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 7, p. 51
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/EVIDENCE--UNITED STATES V. CHARLES: A POST-CRAWFORD ANALYSIS OF AN INTERPRETER AS A DECLARANT: DID THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TAKE ITS DECISION A BRIDGE TOO FAR?
- Published in:
- Western New England Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 3, p. 301
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
CRAWFORD, CONFRONTATION, AND MENTAL STATES.
- Published in:
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 2, p. 219
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Minimizing Confrontation: The Eighth Circuit Uses Crawford to Avoid Bruton for Non-Testimonial Statements.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2011, v. 76, n. 3, p. 895
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
HIJACKING JUSTICE: ASSESSING THE EMERGENCY DRIVEN ANALYSIS OF CONFRONTATION CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2015, v. 36, n. 3, p. 1191
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
FACE-TO-FACE WITH FACIAL RECOGNITION EVIDENCE: ADMISSIBILITY UNDER THE POST-CRAWFORD CONFRONTATION CLAUSE.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 114, n. 7, p. 1317, doi. 10.36644/mlr.114.7.face-to-face
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
EXPANDING FORFEITURE WITHOUT SACRIFICING CONFRONTATION AFTER CRAWFORD.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2005, v. 104, n. 3, p. 599
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Confrontation After COVID.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2022, v. 110, n. 5, p. 1689, doi. 10.15779/Z389P2W69R
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
CRAWFORD'S SHORT-LIVED REVOLUTION: HOW DAVIS V. WASHINGTON REINS IN CRAWFORD'S REACH.
- Published in:
- 2007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
17
The Importance of Prosecution Policies in Domestic Violence Cases.
- Published in:
- Criminology & Public Policy, 2013, v. 12, n. 3, p. 481, doi. 10.1111/1745-9133.12058
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
WHAT HAPPENS IF AUTOPSY REPORTS ARE FOUND TESTIMONIAL?: THE NEXT STEPS TO ENSURE THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THESE CRITICAL DOCUMENTS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2017, v. 107, n. 2, p. 293
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
THE VALIDITY OF UNITED STATES V. NAZEMIAN FOLLOWING CRAWFORD AND ITS PROGENY: DO CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS HAVE THE RIGHT TO FACE THEIR INTERPRETERS AT TRIAL?
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2014, v. 104, n. 2, p. 431
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
CHILD WITNESSES AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2012, v. 102, n. 4, p. 1181
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
SUMMARY EXHIBITS AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE: LOOKING BEYOND THE HEARSAY RULE FOR EVIDENTIARY IMPLICATIONS OF CRAWFORD'S PROGENY.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
22
CONFRONTING FORFEITURE.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 5, p. 1113
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
OUT OF BOUNDS: WHY FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 701 LAY OPINION TESTIMONY NEEDS TO BE RESTRICTED TO TESTIMONY BASED ON PERSONAL FIRST-HAND PERCEPTION.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 5, p. 1999
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
TRUTH, LIES, AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE.
- Published in:
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2018, v. 89, n. 2, p. 565
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON: THE ADMISSIBILITY OF STATEMENTS TO PHYSICIANS AND THE USE OF CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION IN CASES OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE.
- Published in:
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 2005, v. 5, n. 2, p. 411
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
CONFRONTATION CONTROL.
- Published in:
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 83
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
CONFRONTATION AND FORENSIC LABORATORY REPORTS, ROUND FOUR.
- Published in:
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 51
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
APPLYING CRAWFORD'S CONFRONTATION RIGHT IN A DIGITAL AGE.
- Published in:
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
THE REASONABLE CHILD DECLARANT AFTER DAVIS V. WASHINGTON.
- Published in:
- Stanford Law Review, 2009, v. 61, n. 4, p. 923
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Surrogate Testimony After Williams: A New Answer to the Question of Who May Testify Regarding the Contents of a Laboratory Report.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Journal, 2015, v. 90, n. 1, p. 441
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Surrogate Testimony After Williams: A New Answer to the Question of Who May Testify Regarding the Contents of a Laboratory Report.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Journal, 2015, v. 90, n. 1, p. 441
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
TESTING THE TESTIMONIAL DOCTRINE: THE IMPACT OF MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. MASSACHUSETTS ON STATE- LEVEL CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS AND PROCEDURE.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2011, v. 91, n. 2, p. 789
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
TAINTED LAW.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 3, p. 923
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Confrontation and the Law of Evidence: Can the Language Conduit Theory Survive in the Wake of Crawford?
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2014, v. 67, n. 5, p. 1497
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Another Can of Crawford Worms: Certificates of Nonexistence of Public Record and the Confrontation Clause.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2010, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1793
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
GRADUALLY EXPLODED: CONFRONTATION VS. THE FORMER TESTIMONY RULE.
- Published in:
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2015, v. 46, n. 2, p. 137
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
FINDING NIN0: JUSTICE SCALIA'S CONFRONTATION CLAUSE LEGACY FROM ITS (GLORIOUs) BEGINNING TO (BITTER) END.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
DON'T JUST DO SOMETHING!: E-HEARSAY, THE PRESENT SENSE IMPRESSION, AND THE CASE FOR CAUTION IN THE RULEMAKING PROCESS.
- Published in:
- American University Law Review, 2012, v. 61, n. 6, p. 1657
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
CONFRONTING CONFRONTATION: TESTIMONIAL DYING DECLARATIONS.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2015, v. 39, n. 2, p. 465
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Confrontation and Hearsay Issues in Federal Court Terrorism Prosecutions of Gitmo Detainees.
- Published in:
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2010, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1067
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
A BAD CASE OF INDIGESTION: INTERNALIZING CHANGES IN THE RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION AFTER CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON BOTH NATIONALLY AND IN WISCONSIN.
- Published in:
- Marquette Law Review, 2006, v. 89, n. 3, p. 625
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
NONTESTIMONIAL: STATE CHILD HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS IN THE POST-CRAWFORD ERA.
- Published in:
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2025, v. 39, n. 1, p. 389
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Conviction, Confrontation, and Crawford: Gang Expert Testimony as Testimonial Hearsay.
- Published in:
- Seattle University Law Review, 2011, v. 34, n. 3, p. 857
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Saving Face: Arkansas's Application of the Confrontation Clause to Jury Sentencing Proceedings.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2015, v. 68, n. 2, p. 549
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Saving Face: Arkansas's Application of the Confrontation Clause to Jury Sentencing Proceedings.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2013, v. 66, n. 2, p. 549
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
On Reach and Grasp in Criminal Procedure: Crawford in California.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
47
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE: THE CASE FOR A PROMPT POST-ARREST CONFRONTATION HEARING.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 2015, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Defining Interrogation Under the Confrontation Clause After Crawford v. Washington.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2005, v. 39, n. 2, p. 257
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
ARE YOU "AVAILABLE?": AN ANALYSIS OF THE PORCO APPEAL BEFORE THE N.Y. COURT OF APPEALS.
- Published in:
- Albany Government Law Review, 2011, v. 4, n. 4, p. 905
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
But What if the Court Reporter Is Lying? The Right to Confront Hidden Declarants Found in Transcripts of Former Testimony.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2010, v. 2010, n. 4, p. 1149
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article