Works matching DE "COPYRIGHT of fashion design"
1
- Business History Review, 2011, v. 85, n. 2, p. 319, doi. 10.1017/S0007680511000407
- Article
2
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2025, v. 20, n. 2, p. 63, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpae122
- Article
3
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2025, v. 20, n. 2, p. 78, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpae108
- Article
4
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2025, v. 20, n. 2, p. 71, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpae107
- Article
5
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2025, v. 20, n. 2, p. 92, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpae105
- Article
6
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2018, v. 13, n. 11, p. 867, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpy118
- Article
7
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 55, n. 4, p. 1616
- Article
8
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 2017, v. 24, n. 2, p. 575, doi. 10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.2.0575
- Article
9
- Design Issues, 2012, v. 28, n. 4, p. 1, doi. 10.1162/DESI_e_00170
- Brown, Bruce;
- Buchanan, Richard;
- Disalvo, Carl;
- Doordan, Dennis;
- Margolin, Victor
- Article
10
- Design Issues, 2012, v. 28, n. 4, p. 29, doi. 10.1162/DESI_a_00173
- Article
11
- Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2015, v. 6, n. 2, p. 229
- Article
12
- Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2015, v. 6, n. 2, p. 225
- Article
13
- Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2013, v. 4, n. 2, p. 225
- Article
14
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2016, v. 27, n. 1, p. 91
- Article
15
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2021, v. 39, n. 2, p. 691
- Article
16
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2021, v. 39, n. 2, p. 671
- Article
17
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2021, v. 39, n. 2, p. 639
- Article
18
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2021, v. 39, n. 2, p. 607
- Article
19
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2021, v. 39, n. 2, p. 557
- Article
20
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2019, v. 37, n. 2, p. 415
- Article
21
- Pace Law Review, 2012, v. 32, n. 3, p. 856, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1816
- Article
22
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2016, v. 36, n. 2, p. 101
- JIMENEZ, ARIANNE VANESSA JOSEPHINE T.
- Article
23
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 1, p. 375
- Article
24
- Minnesota Law Review, 2016, v. 100, n. 3, p. 1131
- Article
25
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 1, p. 255
- Article
26
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2013, v. 17, n. 1, p. 123
- Article
27
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 1, p. 127
- Article
28
- New England Law Review, 2017, v. 51, n. 3, p. 609
- Article
29
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law, 2012, v. 7, n. 1, p. 195
- Article
30
- Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 193
- Article
31
- New York Law School Law Review, 2019, v. 64, n. 3, p. 265
- Article
32
- University of Baltimore Law Review, 2019, v. 48, n. 3, p. 453
- Article
33
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 159, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2014.916934
- Article
34
- UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 2019, v. 26, n. 1, p. 19, doi. 10.5070/lr8261044051
- Schroeder, Jared;
- Kraeplin, Camille
- Article