Works matching DE "COPYRIGHT of art"
1
- University of Miami Law Review, 2024, v. 78, n. 3, p. 974
- Article
2
- Católica Law Review, 2020, v. 4, n. 2, p. 13, doi. 10.34632/catolicalawreview.2020.9319
- Article
3
- Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society, 1999, v. 29, n. 3, p. 205, doi. 10.1080/10632929909597303
- Article
4
- Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society, 1996, v. 26, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.1080/10632921.1996.9942952
- Article
5
- Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society, 1994, v. 24, n. 3, p. 209, doi. 10.1080/10632921.1994.9941769
- Article
6
- Missouri Law Review, 2019, v. 84, n. 2, p. 371
- Article
7
- Public Art Review, 2014, n. 51, p. 60
- Article
8
- TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 2009, v. 53, n. 5, p. 8, doi. 10.1007/s11528-009-0314-6
- DuBoff, Leonard D.;
- King, Christy O.
- Article
9
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1954, v. 19, n. 2, p. 254, doi. 10.2307/1190490
- Article
10
- Ius Canonicum, 2012, v. 52, n. 104, p. 551, doi. 10.15581/016.52.452
- Article
11
- Access (10300155), 2009, v. 23, n. 1, p. 17
- Article
12
- Critical Arts: A South-North Journal of Cultural & Media Studies, 2006, v. 20, n. 1, p. 144, doi. 10.1080/02560040608557783
- Article
13
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2010, v. 48, n. 3, p. 665
- Article
14
- Pace Law Review, 2016, v. 36, n. 3, p. 800, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1928
- Article
16
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2011, v. 18, n. 2, p. 567
- Article
17
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2009, v. 20, n. 1, p. 167
- Article
18
- Washington University Law Review, 2020, v. 97, n. 4, p. 1233
- Article
19
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2013, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- Buccafusco, Christopher;
- Heald, Paul J.
- Article
20
- Iowa Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 3, p. 1329
- Article
21
- Policy Studies Journal, 1976, v. 5, n. 1, p. 114, doi. 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1976.tb01073.x
- Article
23
- Leonardo, 1999, v. 32, n. 3, p. 191, doi. 10.1162/002409499553226
- Article
24
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2018, v. 86, n. 2, p. 313
- Article
25
- Propiedad Inmaterial, 2012, n. 16, p. 327
- Article
26
- Journal of the History of Collections, 1992, v. 4, n. 1, p. 39, doi. 10.1093/jhc/4.1.39
- Article
27
- Afterimage, 2004, v. 31, n. 4, p. 4, doi. 10.1525/aft.2004.31.4.4
- Article
29
- Art Monthly Australasia, 2013, n. 257, p. 68
- Article
30
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 2, p. 707
- Article
32
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2011, v. 76, n. 4, p. 1487
- Article
33
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2009, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1033
- Article
34
- Visual Resources: An International Journal of Documentation, 2000, v. 16, n. 2, p. 127, doi. 10.1080/01973762.2000.9658542
- Article
35
- Visual Resources: An International Journal of Documentation, 2000, v. 16, n. 2, p. 127, doi. 10.1080/01973762.2000.9658543
- Article
36
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2016, v. 36, n. 3, p. 505, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqv030
- Article
37
- British Art Journal, 2014, v. 15, n. 1, p. ii
- Article
40
- Cornell Law Review, 2016, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1349
- Article
42
- International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2008, v. 14, n. 3, p. 299, doi. 10.1080/10286630802281889
- Article
43
- Emory International Law Review, 2022, v. 36, n. 3, p. 575
- Article
44
- Emory International Law Review, 2022, v. 36, n. 3, p. 539
- Article
45
- Michigan State Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 4, p. 659
- Article
46
- UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 2013, v. 20, n. 1, p. 83, doi. 10.5070/lr8201027164
- Article
47
- International Journal of Cultural Property, 2021, v. 28, n. 2, p. 311, doi. 10.1017/S0940739121000205
- Crommelin, Feyoena;
- Tans, Olaf
- Article
48
- Art, Antiquity & Law, 2018, v. 23, n. 4, p. 289
- Article
49
- Art, Antiquity & Law, 2018, v. 23, n. 2, p. 99
- Article
50
- Art, Antiquity & Law, 2017, v. 22, n. 2, p. 159
- Gould, Emily;
- Herman, Alexander
- Article