INSANE: JAMES HOLMES, CLARK V. ARIZONA, AND AMERICA'S INSANITY DEFENSE.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law & Health, 2018, v. 31, n. 1, p. 33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "CLARK v. Arizona (Supreme Court case)"
Results: 8
1
2
REHABILITATING MENTAL DISORDER EVIDENCE AFTER CLARK V. ARIZONA: OF BURDENS, PRESUMPTIONS, AND THE RIGHT TO RAISE REASONABLE DOUBT.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2010, v. 60, n. 3, p. 645
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
US Supreme Court Denies Review of Idaho's Abolition of Insanity Defense; Three Justices Dissent.
- Published in:
- Developments in Mental Health Law, 2013, v. 32, n. 1, p. 12
- Publication type:
- Article
4
OVERWORKING THE PRESUMPTION OF SANITY: CLARK'S USE OF MENTAL DISEASE EVIDENCE TO NEGATE MENS REA.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2007, v. 55, n. 2, p. 467
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Mens Rea and Insanity Defense under U.S. Law -- An Analysis of Clark v. Arizona.
- Published in:
- EurAmerica, 2009, v. 39, n. 4, p. 615
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
CRIMINAL INSANITY AND MENS REA: A DISCUSSION OF ALABAMA INSANITY LAW AND THE ROLE OF PSYCHIATRISTS IN DETERMINING CRIMINAL INSANITY.
- Published in:
- Law & Psychology Review, 2007, v. 31, p. 179
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Internal and External Challenges to Culpability.
- Published in:
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2021, v. 53, n. 2, p. 617
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
DANGEROUSNESS, DISABILITY, AND DNA.
- Published in:
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 1, p. 149
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article