Works matching DE "CIVIL Rights Act of 1991"
1
- Missouri Law Review, 2025, v. 90, n. 2, p. 635
- Article
2
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2025, v. 55, n. 5, p. 1577, doi. 10.60095/wkjv2749
- Article
3
- Touro Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 4, p. 923
- Article
4
- Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 2017, v. 25, n. 1, p. 43
- Article
5
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 37, n. 1, p. 113
- Article
6
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2022, v. 47, n. 2, p. 685
- Article
7
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2021, v. 29, n. 3, p. 371
- Article
8
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2015, v. 39, n. 3, p. 557
- Article
9
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2009, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01136.x
- Article
10
- Creighton Law Review, 2020, v. 53, n. 2, p. 313
- Article
11
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2018, v. 2018, n. 5, p. 1031
- Article
12
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 5, p. 1001
- Article
13
- Perspectives (0821-1507), 2018, v. 42, n. 2, p. 38
- Article
14
- International Multilingual Research Journal, 2015, v. 9, n. 4, p. 227, doi. 10.1080/19313152.2015.1091267
- McCarty, Teresa L.;
- Nicholas, Sheilah E.;
- Wyman, Leisy T.
- Article
16
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2021, v. 16, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
17
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2021, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.36643/mjrl.27.1.law
- Article
18
- Cardozo Law Review, 2014, v. 35, n. 4, p. 1587
- Article
19
- Alabama Law Review, 2013, v. 64, n. 5, p. 1067
- Article
20
- Alabama Law Review, 2013, v. 64, n. 2, p. 187
- Article
21
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2022, v. 49, n. 4, p. 915
- Article
22
- Cornell Law Review, 2024, v. 109, n. 6, p. 1447
- Article
23
- Education Next, 2012, v. 12, n. 3, p. 7
- DUNN, JOSHUA;
- DERTHICK, MARTHA
- Article
24
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2016, v. 54, n. 3, p. 483
- Article
25
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2020, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1445
- Article
26
- Journal of Intercultural Disciplines, 2014, v. 14, p. 7
- Article
27
- Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 5, p. 1789
- Article
29
- New Mexico Law Review, 2011, v. 41, n. 1, p. 295
- Article
30
- Hoover Digest: Research & Opinion on Public Policy, 2025, n. 2, p. 42
- Article
31
- Southern Journal of Business & Ethics, 2011, v. 3, p. 33
- Article
32
- ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 2021, v. 35, n. 3, p. 473
- Article
33
- ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 2020, v. 35, n. 1, p. 53
- Article
34
- ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 2018, v. 33, n. 2, p. 175
- Article
35
- Georgia Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 2, p. 685
- Article
36
- Yale Law & Policy Review, 2021, v. 40, n. 1, p. 149
- Article
37
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2017, v. 48, n. 3, p. 643
- Article
38
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 5, p. 1035
- Article
39
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 2, p. 281
- Article
40
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 2, p. 261
- Article
41
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 2, p. 209
- Article
42
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 1, p. 113
- Article
43
- Law & Society Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 2, p. 259, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00488.x
- Article
44
- Labor Law Journal, 2016, v. 67, n. 1, p. 347
- Article
45
- Labor Law Journal, 2015, v. 66, n. 2, p. 111
- Marcum, Tanya M.;
- Perry, Sandra J.
- Article
46
- New Labor Forum (Sage Publications Inc.), 2015, v. 24, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1177/1095796014561499
- Article