Works matching DE "CICERONIANISM"
1
- Nova Tellus, 2010, v. 28, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
2
- International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 2022, v. 29, n. 2, p. 168, doi. 10.1007/s12138-021-00601-7
- Article
3
- International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 2016, v. 23, n. 2, p. 108, doi. 10.1007/s12138-015-0385-z
- Article
4
- Scholarly & Research Communication, 2015, p. 1
- Article
5
- Journal of Communication & Religion, 2015, v. 38, n. 4, p. 73, doi. 10.5840/jcr201538427
- Article
6
- Journal of Communication & Religion, 2008, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.5840/jcr20083111
- Article
7
- Conradian, 2015, v. 40, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
8
- History of Education & Children's Literature, 2019, v. 14, n. 1, p. 535
- Article
9
- Law & Literature, 2004, v. 16, n. 1, p. 93, doi. 10.1525/lal.2004.16.1.93
- Article
10
- Communication Teacher, 2007, v. 21, n. 3, p. 87, doi. 10.1080/17404620701633951
- Article
11
- Western Speech, 1962, v. 26, n. 1, p. 13
- Article
13
- Historical Journal, 2019, v. 62, n. 3, p. 639, doi. 10.1017/S0018246X18000353
- Article
14
- Linguistica, 2023, v. 63, n. 1/2, p. 197, doi. 10.4312/linguistica.63.1-2.197-212
- Article
15
- Reformation & Renaissance Review: Journal of the Society for Reformation Studies, 2004, v. 6, n. 1, p. 107, doi. 10.1558/rarr.6.1.107.52513
- Article
16
- European Journal of Philosophy, 2012, v. 20, n. 1, p. 91, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00514.x
- Article
17
- Classical World, 2011, v. 104, n. 3, p. 333, doi. 10.1353/clw.2011.0046
- Article
18
- Renaissance Quarterly, 2023, v. 76, n. 2, p. 408, doi. 10.1017/rqx.2022.442
- Article
20
- Renaissance Quarterly, 2012, v. 65, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1086/665835
- Article
21
- International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 2017, v. 10, n. 1, p. 93
- Article
24
- Review of English Studies, 2018, v. 69, n. 288, p. 56, doi. 10.1093/res/hgx065
- Article
25
- Perspectives on Political Science, 2016, v. 45, n. 2, p. 113, doi. 10.1080/10457097.2015.1022056
- Article
27
- Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 1998, v. 1, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.1353/rap.2010.0178
- Article
28
- Terminus, 2014, v. 16, n. 3, p. 305, doi. 10.4467/20843844TE.14.008.3085
- Article
29
- Communication Quarterly, 1976, v. 24, n. 4, p. 2, doi. 10.1080/01463377609369231
- Article
30
- Studia Neophilologica, 1999, v. 71, n. 2, p. 174, doi. 10.1080/003932799750041722
- Article
32
- Global Intellectual History, 2021, v. 6, n. 6, p. 807, doi. 10.1080/23801883.2019.1637271
- Article
33
- Notes & Queries, 1991, v. 38, n. 1, p. 82
- Article
34
- Classica Cracoviensia, 2011, p. 113
- Article
35
- Cistercian Studies Quarterly, 2010, v. 45, n. 4, p. 401
- Article
36
- Renaissance & Reformation / Renaissance et Réforme, 2022, v. 45, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.33137/rr.v45i1.39105
- Article
38
- Journal of Roman Studies, 2022, v. 112, p. 286, doi. 10.1017/S0075435822000612
- Article
44
- Perspectives in Biology & Medicine, 2019, v. 62, n. 3, p. 470, doi. 10.1353/pbm.2019.0027
- Article
45
- Argumentation, 2007, v. 21, n. 2, p. 115, doi. 10.1007/s10503-007-9039-x
- Article
46
- RSQ: Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 1998, v. 28, n. 2, p. 5, doi. 10.1080/02773949809391116
- Article
47
- RSQ: Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 1989, v. 19, n. 3, p. 217, doi. 10.1080/02773948909390849
- Article
48
- 1976
- Enos, Richard Leo;
- Constant, Dean N.
- Bibliography
49
- Rhetoric Review, 2012, v. 31, n. 3, p. 203, doi. 10.1080/07350198.2012.683991
- Article
50
- Rhetoric Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 4, p. 333, doi. 10.1080/07350198.2011.604607
- Article