Why Courts Fail to Protect Privacy: Race, Age, Bias and Technology.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 2, p. 263, doi. 10.15779/Z38GF0MW50
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "CELL phone tracking laws"
Results: 16
1
2
HISTORICAL CELLULAR LOCATION INFORMATION AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 1, p. 263
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
"WE KNOW NOT WHERE WE GO": PROTECTING DIGITAL PRIVACY IN NEW YORK CITY'S MUNICIPAL WI-FI NETWORK.
- Published in:
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2018, v. 45, n. 3, p. 699
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
GAME OF PHONES: THE FOURTH AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF REAL-TIME CELL PHONE TRACKING.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2017, v. 65, n. 1, p. 75
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN? YOUR PHONE KNOWS (AND SO MIGHT THE POLICE).
- Published in:
- South Carolina Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 4, p. 709
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Cell Phone or Government Tracking Device? Protecting Cell Site Location Information with Probable Cause.
- Published in:
- Duquesne Law Review, 2018, v. 56, n. 1, p. 107
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
STOPPING POLICE IN THEIR TRACKS: PROTECTING CELLULAR LOCATION INFORMATION PRIVACY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY.
- Published in:
- Duke Law & Technology Review, 2015, v. 14, n. 1, p. 200
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
RILEY V. CALIFORNIA AND THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOR THE THIRD-PARTY SEARCH DOCTRINE.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2016, v. 18, n. 3, p. 895
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF CELL-SITE SIMULATORS.
- Published in:
- Albany Government Law Review, 2015, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
IN DEFENSE OF THE REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY: CELL PHONE TRACKING AS AN UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND HOW NEW JERSEY GOT IT RIGHT.
- Published in:
- Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2015, v. 41, n. 1, p. 134
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Surveillance Remedies: Stingrays and the Exclusionary Rule.
- Published in:
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 337
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Surveillance Remedies: Stingrays and the Exclusionary Rule.
- Published in:
- Oregon Law Review, 2017, v. 96, n. 1, p. 337
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
YOUR SECRET STINGRAY'S NO SECRET ANYMORE: THE VANISHING GOVERNMENT MONOPOLY OVER CELL PHONE SURVEILLANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND CONSUMER PRIVACY.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2014, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
"TIME WORKS CHANGES": MODERNIZING FOURTH AMENDMENT LAWTO PROTECT CELL SITE LOCATION INFORMATION.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2016, v. 57, n. 5, p. 1781
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
UNPACKING THE DIRTBOX: CONFRONTING CELL PHONE LOCATION TRACKING WITH THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2016, v. 57, n. 2, p. 731
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Upholding Citizens' Privacy in the Use of Stingray Technology: Is New York Behind?
- Published in:
- Pace Law Review, 2016, v. 37, n. 1, p. 352
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article