Works matching DE "CELL phone laws"
1
- Spectrum: Journal of State Government, 2001, v. 74, n. 1, p. 17
- Article
2
- Hawaii Journal of Medicine & Public Health, 2014, v. 73, n. 2, p. 70
- Article
3
- Professional Safety, 2012, v. 57, n. 1, p. 16
- Article
4
- Charleston Law Review, 2012, v. 6, n. 4, p. 807
- Article
5
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2004, v. 51, n. 2, p. 53
- Article
6
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 5, p. 1363
- Article
7
- Varstvoslovje: Journal of Criminal Justice & Security, 2018, v. 20, n. 4, p. 414
- Hribar, Domen;
- Dvojmoč, Miha;
- Markelj, Blaž
- Article
8
- Education Journal, 2025, n. 593, p. 45
- Article
9
- Communication Research Reports, 2015, v. 32, n. 1, p. 107, doi. 10.1080/08824096.2014.989977
- Lancaster, Alexander L.;
- Goodboy, Alan K.
- Article
10
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2019, v. 57, n. 2, p. 353
- Article
11
- Journal of Law & Education, 2014, v. 43, n. 2, p. 279
- Article
12
- Journal of Law & Education, 2012, v. 41, n. 1, p. 261
- Article
13
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2019, v. 5, n. 4, p. 476, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2019/4/6
- Ó Fathaigh, Ronan;
- van Hoboken, Joris
- Article
15
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 2015, v. 21, n. 3, p. 1
- Arnold, Michael;
- Kiker, Dennis R.
- Article
16
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 2010, v. 17, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
17
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2014, v. 50, n. 2, p. 40
- Article
18
- University of Miami Law Review, 2016, v. 70, n. 4, p. 1179
- MARKUS, DAVID OSCAR;
- WESSLER, NATHAN FREED
- Article
19
- University of Miami Law Review, 2018, v. 72, n. 3, p. 880
- Article
20
- University of Miami Law Review, 2016, v. 70, n. 4, p. 1252
- Article
21
- Police Journal, 2017, v. 90, n. 3, p. 274, doi. 10.1177/0032258X17719606
- Article
22
- Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, 2013, v. 2, n. 1, p. 68, doi. 10.69554/kkja8564
- Article
23
- European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2011, v. 2, n. 2, p. 279, doi. 10.1017/S1867299X00001276
- Article
24
- Empirical Economics, 2016, v. 51, n. 2, p. 853, doi. 10.1007/s00181-015-1018-8
- Rocco, Leandro;
- Sampaio, Breno
- Article
25
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2013, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
26
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2014, v. 58, n. 4, p. 1109
- Article
27
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2017, v. 22, n. 1, p. 297
- Article
28
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2015, v. 20, n. 3, p. 642
- Article
29
- Traffic Injury Prevention, 2010, v. 11, n. 2, p. 133, doi. 10.1080/15389580903515427
- McCartt, AnneT.;
- Hellinga, LaurieA.;
- Strouse, LauraM.;
- Farmer, CharlesM.
- Article
30
- Emory Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 1, p. 111
- Article
31
- Journal of Insurance Regulation, 2016, v. 35, n. 1, p. 1
- Puelz, Robert;
- Robertson, Hanna E.
- Article
32
- University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2021, v. 31, n. 2, p. 307
- Article
33
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2010, v. 34, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
34
- Transportation Law Journal, 2014, v. 41, n. 1, p. 33
- Article
35
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2014, v. 27, n. 2, p. 563
- Article
36
- Duke Law Journal, 2013, v. 63, n. 3, p. 735
- Article
37
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2018, v. 30, n. 2, p. 219
- Article
38
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2012, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1355
- Article
39
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2016, v. 24, n. 3, p. 879
- Article
41
- Florida State University Law Review, 2012, v. 39, n. 4, p. 1077
- Article
42
- Northern Kentucky Law Review, 2015, v. 42, n. 2, p. 395
- Article
43
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2015, v. 41, n. 2, p. 271
- Article