HOW A CLASS ACTION PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES CAN PREVENT MOOTNESS DESPITE A DEFENDANT'S TENDER OF DAMAGES.Published in:Cardozo Law Review, 2017, v. 39, n. 1, p. 345By:Shamailova, LyubaPublication type:Article
IS DERIVATIVE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY JURISDICTIONAL? AN ANALYSIS AND RESOLUTION OF THE CIRCUIT SPLIT.Published in:Public Contract Law Journal, 2018, v. 47, n. 4, p. 605By:Eatherton, VictoriaPublication type:Article
CAMPBELL-EWALD CO. V. GOMEZ: DIMINISHING THE DERIVATIVE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY DOCTRINE AND THE SOCIAL COSTS OF INCREASING LIABILITY TO GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS.Published in:William & Mary Law Review, 2018, v. 59, n. 4, p. 1491By:Lewis, W. LoganPublication type:Article
Annual Workplace Class Action Litigation Report: An Overview of 2016 in Workplace Class Action Litigation.Published in:Labor Law Journal, 2017, v. 68, n. 1, p. 11By:Maatman, GeraldPublication type:Article
The High Court Speaks on Standing, Mootness, Arbitration, and Representative Evidence.Published in:Business Lawyer, 2017, v. 72, n. 2, p. 567By:Stromquist, Matthew O.;Christakis, Anna-Katrina S.;Pilgrim, Jeffrey D.Publication type:Article