Works matching DE "CAMPAIGN fund laws"
1
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 126, n. 5, p. 1577
- Article
5
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 659
- Article
6
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2014, v. 95, n. 5, p. 1295, doi. 10.1111/ssqu.12067
- Article
7
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2003, v. 84, n. 4, p. 811, doi. 10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404003.x
- Article
8
- Southern Economic Journal, 2017, v. 84, n. 1, p. 98, doi. 10.1002/soej.12220
- Shapiro, Dmitry;
- Zillante, Arthur
- Article
9
- University of Miami Law Review, 2014, v. 68, n. 3, p. 633
- Article
10
- Public Integrity, 2019, v. 21, n. 2, p. 111, doi. 10.1080/10999922.2018.1473316
- Article
11
- Public Relations Tactics, 2010, v. 17, n. 2, p. 4
- Article
12
- New York University Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 4, p. 1160
- Article
13
- 2015
- GERKEN, HEATHER K.;
- BAUER, ROBERT F.;
- GINSBERG, BENJAMIN L.
- Interview
14
- Duke Law Journal, 2021, v. 71, n. 1, p. 167
- Article
15
- California Law Review, 1983, v. 71, n. 2, p. 673, doi. 10.2307/3480172
- Article
16
- California Law Review, 1981, v. 69, n. 4, p. 1001, doi. 10.2307/3480285
- Article
17
- Columbia Law Review, 2020, v. 120, n. 6, p. 178
- Article
18
- Columbia Law Review, 2019, v. 119, n. 2, p. 487
- Article
19
- Columbia Law Review, 2018, v. 118, n. 6, p. 1857
- Article
21
- Brookings Review, 1998, v. 16, n. 1, p. 20, doi. 10.2307/20080762
- Article
22
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 9, p. 179
- STRAUSE, RENATA E. B.;
- TOKAJI, DANIEL P.
- Article
23
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 9, p. i
- Article
24
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2019, v. 13, n. 2, p. 471
- Article
25
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2011, v. 5, n. 1, p. 135
- Article
26
- Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2017, v. 25, n. 3, p. 417
- Article
27
- Emory Law Journal, 2021, v. 70, n. 5, p. 1171
- Article
28
- Emory Law Journal, 2021, v. 70, n. 5, p. 1091
- Article
29
- Emory Law Journal, 2017, v. 66, n. 6, p. 1493
- Article
30
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 63, n. 4, p. 781
- Article
31
- Emory Law Journal, 2006, v. 55, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
32
- Willamette Law Review, 2013, v. 49, n. 4, p. 541
- WEINTRAUB, ELLEN L.;
- TAUSANOVITCH, ALEX
- Article
33
- Willamette Law Review, 2013, v. 49, n. 4, p. 603
- Article
36
- Willamette Law Review, 2013, v. 49, n. 4, p. 501
- ERENBERG, DEBRA;
- BERG, MATT
- Article
37
- Washburn Law Journal, 2015, v. 54, n. 2, p. 357
- Article
38
- Syracuse Law Review, 2016, v. 66, n. 2, p. 301
- Article
39
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2012, v. 68, n. 2, p. 239
- Article
41
- Cardozo Law Review, 2010, v. 31, n. 6, p. 2365
- Article
42
- American Bar Association Journal, 1983, v. 69, n. 6, p. 715
- Article
43
- American Bar Association Journal, 1982, v. 68, n. 2, p. 199
- Article
44
- Southern California Law Review, 2018, v. 91, n. 2, p. 339
- Article
45
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 6, p. 1247
- Article
46
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 4, p. 917
- Article
47
- Southern California Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 6, p. 1239
- KANG, MICHAEL S.;
- SHEPHERD, JOANNA M.
- Article
48
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2020, v. 81, n. 3, p. 405
- Article
49
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 4, p. 791
- Article
50
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 4, p. 791
- Article