Works matching DE "BUSH v. Gore"
1
- Indiana Law Journal, 2019, v. 94, n. 2, p. 451
- Article
2
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 2, p. 281
- LAMPARELLO, ADAM;
- MACLEAN, CHARLES E.
- Article
4
- William & Mary Law Review, 2018, v. 60, n. 2, p. 335
- BARNETT, CODY S.;
- DOUGLAS, JOSHUA A.
- Article
5
- Law & Society Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1027, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00464.x
- Owens, Ryan J.;
- Wedeking, Justin P.
- Article
6
- Constitutional Commentary, 2008, v. 25, n. 2, p. 215
- Neuman, Gerald L.;
- Hatzis, Nicholas
- Article
7
- Constitutional Commentary, 2002, v. 19, n. 3, p. 619
- Article
8
- Constitutional Commentary, 2002, v. 19, n. 3, p. 609
- Article
9
- Constitutional Commentary, 2002, v. 19, n. 3, p. 571
- Article
10
- Constitutional Commentary, 2002, v. 19, n. 3, p. 543
- Article
11
- Constitutional Commentary, 2001, v. 18, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
12
- California Law Review, 2001, v. 89, n. 6, p. 1721, doi. 10.2307/3481248
- Article
13
- e-Journal of Science & Technology, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 1
- Article
14
- Text & Talk, 2016, v. 36, n. 4, p. 391, doi. 10.1515/text-2016-0018
- Article
16
- George Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1865
- Article
18
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 947
- Article
19
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 941
- Article
20
- Economics & Politics, 2010, v. 22, n. 3, p. 257, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2009.00359.x
- Article
21
- Political Behavior, 2007, v. 29, n. 3, p. 327, doi. 10.1007/s11109-006-9021-6
- Article
22
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2018, v. 71, n. 2, p. 465
- Article
23
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 343
- Article
24
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2024, v. 59, n. 1, p. 61
- Kafker, Scott L.;
- Jacobs, Simon D.
- Article
25
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2013, v. 43, n. 3, p. 392, doi. 10.1093/publius/pjt023
- Article
26
- Villanova Law Review, 2006, v. 51, n. 1, p. 229
- Saphire, Richard B.;
- Moke, Paul
- Article
27
- Public Integrity, 2002, v. 4, n. 3, p. 239, doi. 10.1080/15580989.2002.11770917
- Article
28
- Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 2001, v. 4, n. 4, p. 605, doi. 10.1353/rap.2001.0075
- Prosise, Theodore O.;
- Smith, Craig R.
- Article
30
- Yale Law Journal, 2007, v. 116, n. 5, p. 1159, doi. 10.2307/20455752
- Article
31
- Journal of American History, 2001, v. 88, n. 2, p. 436, doi. 10.2307/2675099
- Article
32
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 6, p. 1705
- Article
33
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1865
- Article
34
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1836
- Article
35
- Quality & Quantity, 2007, v. 41, n. 4, p. 579, doi. 10.1007/s11135-007-9072-8
- Article
36
- Boston Review, 2011, v. 36, n. 1, p. 10
- Article
37
- Law & Philosophy, 2002, v. 21, n. 2, p. 221, doi. 10.2307/3505131
- Sinnoti-Armstrong, Walter
- Article
38
- Law & Philosophy, 2002, v. 21, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.2307/3505130
- Article
39
- Law & Philosophy, 2002, v. 21, n. 2, p. 165, doi. 10.2307/3505129
- Article
40
- Law & Philosophy, 2002, v. 21, n. 2, p. 121, doi. 10.2307/3505127
- Article
41
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2012, v. 75, n. 3, p. 1
- Article
42
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2002, v. 65, n. 3, p. 7, doi. 10.2307/1192401
- Article
43
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 963
- Article
45
- Columbia Law Review, 2018, v. 118, n. 3, p. 915
- Fishkin, Joseph;
- Pozen, David E.
- Article
47
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2020, v. 62, p. 5
- Article
49
- 2011
- Conference Paper/Materials