Works matching DE "BURWELL v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc."
1
- Labor Law Journal, 2014, v. 65, n. 4, p. 175
- Article
2
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2017, v. 32, n. 2, p. 211
- Article
3
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2016, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
4
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2015, v. 29, n. 1, p. 104
- Article
5
- George Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 5, p. 1462
- Article
6
- Human Life Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 3, p. 7
- Article
7
- Guttmacher Policy Review, 2014, v. 17, n. 1, p. 2
- Article
8
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2016, v. 25, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
9
- SMU Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 1, p. 307
- Article
10
- SMU Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 1, p. 243
- Article
11
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2017, v. 25, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
12
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 3, p. 435
- LUNSFORD, JENNIFER;
- SANZONE, R. ZACHARY
- Article
13
- Alabama Law Review, 2018, v. 69, n. 4, p. 913
- Article
14
- National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 2015, v. 15, n. 1, p. 21
- Article
15
- National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 2014, v. 14, n. 2, p. 207
- Article
17
- Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 2017, p. 207
- Article
18
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2017, v. 25, n. 2, p. 165, doi. 10.1007/s10691-017-9348-x
- Article
19
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2016, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
20
- UMKC Law Review, 2015, v. 84, n. 2, p. 519
- Article
21
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1617
- Article
22
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 703
- Article
23
- Nevada Law Journal, 2015, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
24
- Missouri Law Review, 2015, v. 80, n. 2, p. 381
- Article
25
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2016, v. 14, n. 4, p. 941, doi. 10.1093/icon/mow057
- Article
26
- Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 2016, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
27
- South Carolina Law Review, 2015, v. 67, n. 1, p. 73
- Article
28
- Cornell International Law Journal, 2015, v. 48, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
29
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 75, n. 1, p. 392
- Article
30
- Journal of Church & State, 2020, v. 62, n. 4, p. 630, doi. 10.1093/jcs/csz081
- Article
31
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2017, v. 31, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
32
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
33
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
34
- Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 2014, v. 39, n. 3, p. 819
- Article
35
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2017, v. 50, n. 3, p. 417
- Article
36
- Business Lawyer, 2014, v. 70, n. 1, p. 1
- Johnson, Lyman;
- Millón, David
- Article
37
- Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2016, v. 25, n. 1, p. 239
- Article
38
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 3, p. 929
- Article
39
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2018, v. 112, n. 5, p. 929
- Article
40
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2015, v. 77, n. 2, p. 259, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2015.398
- Article
41
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 2, p. 353
- Goodrich, Luke W.;
- Busick, Rachel N.
- Article
42
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2023, v. 55, n. 3, p. 507
- Article
43
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2023, v. 55, n. 2, p. 507
- Article
44
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2020, v. 52, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
45
- Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 3, p. 1185
- Article
46
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 114, n. 4, p. 619
- Article
47
- Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2015, v. 50, n. 1, p. 99
- Article
48
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2017, v. 11, n. 1, p. 308
- Article
49
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2016, v. 10, n. 2, p. 884
- Article
50
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2016, v. 10, n. 1, p. 327
- Article