Connecting you to content on EBSCOhost

Works matching DE "BULLCOMING v. New Mexico (Supreme Court case)"

Results: 6

1

The Reinvigorated Confrontation Clause: A New Basis to Challenge the Admission of Evidence From Nontestifying Forensic Experts in White Collar Prosecutions.

Published in:

Defense Counsel Journal, 2014, v. 81, n. 1, p. 11, doi. 10.12690/IADC-14-002

By:

Frongillo, Thomas C.;
Simons, Caroline K.;
Essinger, Jaclyn;
Knowles, Matthew

Publication type:

Article

2

CONFRONTING FORENSICS: BULLCOMING V. NEW MEXICO AND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT.

Published in:

2012

By:

Weisgerber, Megan

Publication type:

Opinion

3

Confronting the Forensic Confirmation Bias.

Published in:

Yale Law & Policy Review, 2015, v. 33, n. 2, p. 457

By:

Peña Perez, John Rafael

Publication type:

Article

4

CONFRONTATION AND KABUKI.

Published in:

2012

By:

Sklansky, David Alan

Publication type:

Essay

5

"BULL" COMING FROM THE STATES: WHY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD USE WILLIAMS V. ILLINOIS TO CLOSE ONE OF BULLCOMING'S CONFRONTATION CLAUSE LOOPHOLES.

Published in:

Florida State University Law Review, 2012, v. 39, n. 2, p. 533

By:

Price, Tara R.

Publication type:

Article

6

CONFRONTATION AND FAIRNESS.

Published in:

Texas Tech Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 103

By:

Sklansky, David Alan

Publication type:

Article