Works matching DE "BIOTECHNOLOGY patents"
1
- Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik, 2017, v. 22, n. 1, p. 285, doi. 10.1515/jwiet-2017-0013
- Article
2
- Emory Law Journal, 2018, v. 67, n. 4, p. 889
- Article
4
- GM Crops & Food, 2013, v. 4, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.4161/gmcr.26251
- Article
5
- Houston Law Review, 2017, v. 54, n. 4, p. 995
- Article
6
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2014, v. 49, n. 5, p. 1519
- Article
7
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, p. 379, doi. 10.15779/Z38PN8XF4W
- Article
8
- Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 2019, v. 22, n. 4, p. 909, doi. 10.1007/s10677-019-10009-7
- Article
9
- Michigan Technology Law Review, 2020, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
11
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2019, v. 69, n. 3, p. 731
- Article
12
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2008, v. 58, n. 4, p. 1343
- Article
13
- PLoS ONE, 2017, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1371/journal.pone.0169961
- van den Oord, Ad;
- van Witteloostuijn, Arjen
- Article
14
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2019, v. 38, n. 1, p. 183
- Article
15
- Scientometrics, 2017, v. 113, n. 3, p. 1407, doi. 10.1007/s11192-017-2549-x
- Reinstaller, Andreas;
- Reschenhofer, Peter
- Article
16
- Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 2011, v. 24, n. 1/2, p. 85, doi. 10.1080/13511610.2011.571405
- Kica, Evisa;
- Groenendijk, Nico
- Article
17
- European Food & Feed Law Review, 2016, v. 11, n. 3, p. 220
- Article
18
- European Law Journal, 2012, v. 18, n. 6, p. 821, doi. 10.1111/eulj.12005
- Article
19
- Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 2008, v. 18, n. 1, p. 131
- Article
20
- New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 2020, v. 53, n. 1, p. 135
- Article
21
- Minnesota Law Review, 2018, v. 102, n. 5, p. 2229
- Article
22
- Journal of Generic Medicines, 2017, v. 13, n. 3, p. 137, doi. 10.1177/1741134317694483
- Article
26
- Industrial & Corporate Change, 2018, v. 27, n. 1, p. 189, doi. 10.1093/icc/dtw057
- Kolympiris, Christos;
- Hoenen, Sebastian;
- Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas
- Article
27
- Industrial & Corporate Change, 2015, v. 24, n. 6, p. 1215, doi. 10.1093/icc/dtu029
- Arts, Sam;
- Veugelers, Reinhilde
- Article
28
- BMC Proceedings, 2014, p. 1, doi. 10.1186/1753-6561-8-S4-O48
- Article
29
- Industry & Innovation, 2013, v. 20, n. 3, p. 241, doi. 10.1080/13662716.2013.791125
- Beaudry, Catherine;
- Kananian, Ramine
- Article
30
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2010, v. 15, n. 1, p. 55
- Jauhar, Ameen;
- Narnaulia, Swati
- Article
33
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2008, v. 13, n. 2, p. 176
- Article
35
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2008, v. 13, n. 2, p. 129
- Article
36
- Medical Law Review, 2003, v. 11, n. 1, p. 67, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/11.1.67
- Article
37
- DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2016, v. 36, n. 2, p. 73, doi. 10.14429/djlit.36.2.9479
- Article
38
- Nature Biotechnology, 2015, v. 33, n. 9, p. 925, doi. 10.1038/nbt.3334
- Article
39
- Nature Biotechnology, 2014, v. 32, n. 6, p. 512, doi. 10.1038/nbt.2918
- Huggett, Brady;
- Paisner, Kathryn
- Article
40
- Nature Biotechnology, 2013, v. 31, n. 6, p. 501, doi. 10.1038/nbt.2598
- Article
42
- Scientometrics, 2011, v. 86, n. 2, p. 505, doi. 10.1007/s11192-010-0269-6
- Glänzel, Wolfgang;
- Zhou, Ping
- Article
43
- Scientometrics, 2007, v. 70, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.1007/s11192-007-0103-y
- Armando Albert;
- Begoña Granadino;
- Luis Plaza
- Article
44
- Annals of Regional Science, 2018, v. 61, n. 2, p. 399, doi. 10.1007/s00168-018-0874-5
- Article
45
- Michigan State Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 4, p. 1367
- Article
46
- Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2019, v. 37, p. 41, doi. 10.1016/j.ejbt.2018.10.004
- Barragán-Ocaña, Alejandro;
- Gómez-Viquez, Hortensia;
- Merritt, Humberto;
- Oliver-Espinoza, Rubén
- Article
47
- Tulane Law Review, 2010, v. 85, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
48
- Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law, 2014, v. 10, p. 273
- Article
50
- International Journal of Innovation & Technology Management, 2015, v. 12, n. 3, p. -1, doi. 10.1142/S0219877015020010
- Article