Direct Legislation in North America and Europe: Promoting or Restricting Biotechnology?
- Published in:
- Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2009, v. 11, n. 4, p. 425, doi. 10.1080/13876980903222864
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "BIOTECHNOLOGY laws"
Results: 104
1
2
How Ethics Can Better Anticipate the Consequences of Emerging Biotechnologies.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2022, v. 22, n. 1, p. 46, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2021.2001112
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Patenting Foundational Technologies: Recent Developments in the CRISPR Patent Struggle.
- Published in:
- 2020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
4
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Patenting Foundational Technologies: Lessons From CRISPR and Other Core Biotechnologies”.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2019, v. 19, n. 1, p. W10, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2018.1538395
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Biolaw: an autonomous discipline?
- Published in:
- Revista Bioetica, 2017, v. 25, n. 2, p. 282, doi. 10.1590/1983-80422017252188
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
7
GM crops in the courts.
- Published in:
- GM Crops & Food, 2013, v. 4, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.4161/gmcr.26251
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Factors influencing stakeholders' attitudes toward cross-kingdom gene transfer in rice.
- Published in:
- New Genetics & Society, 2014, v. 33, n. 4, p. 370, doi. 10.1080/14636778.2014.951992
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Biotechnology regulation: limiting or contributing to biotech development?
- Published in:
- New Genetics & Society, 2001, v. 20, n. 3, p. 255, doi. 10.1080/14636770120093010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Regulatory slowdown on GM crop decisions.
- Published in:
- 2006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Letter
11
Counterpoint: Why biogenerics are a strawman.
- Published in:
- Nature Biotechnology, 2006, v. 24, n. 3, p. 269, doi. 10.1038/nbt0306-269
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Rejecting the gambler's principle.
- Published in:
- 2005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
13
News In Brief.
- Published in:
- Nature Biotechnology, 2005, v. 23, n. 4, p. 405, doi. 10.1038/nbt0405-405
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
More views of Cartagena.
- Published in:
- Nature Biotechnology, 1999, v. 17, n. 8, p. 733, doi. 10.1038/11616
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
EPA biotech rule reviewed yet again.
- Published in:
- Nature Biotechnology, 1999, v. 17, n. 5, p. 415, doi. 10.1038/8579
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Regulations and consumer attitudes toward biotechnology.
- Published in:
- Nature Biotechnology, 1999, v. 17, p. 37, doi. 10.1038/7177
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
GENETICALLY CUSTOMIZED GENERATIONS--A NEED FOR INCREASED REGULATORY CONTROL OVER GENE EDITING TECHNOLOGY IN THE UNITED STATES.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 585
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
THE FAILURE OF FEDERAL BIOTECHNOLOGY REGULATION.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2017, v. 51, n. 2, p. 483
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
IN SEARCH OF INSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY: THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COMES OF AGE.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2008, v. 23, n. 2, p. 787
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
A BRAVE NEW WORLD OF DESIGNER BABIES?
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2007, v. 22, n. 2, p. 897
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE BAR: A RESPONSE TO THE GROWING DIVIDE BETWEEN SCIENCE AND THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2007, v. 22, n. 2, p. 671
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Against Free Markets, Against Science? Regulating the Socio-Economic Effects of Biotechnology.
- Published in:
- Rural Sociology, 2008, v. 73, n. 2, p. 147, doi. 10.1526/003601108784514570
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
News in brief.
- Published in:
- Nature, 2005, v. 435, n. 7046, p. 1150, doi. 10.1038/4351150a
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Under Attack: Reconceptualizing Informed Consent.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2017, v. 45, n. 1, p. 6, doi. 10.1177/1073110517703095
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Top Ten Biotechnology Patent Cases of 2023: Antibodies Unenabled, Extrinsic Evidence Excluded, and Double Patenting Prohibited.
- Published in:
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2024, v. 32, n. 3, p. 249
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
THE BIOSAFETY PROTOCOL AND ITS SOCI-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SEEDS OF DISCORD.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Environmental Studies, 2004, v. 61, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1080/0020723032000119019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
GENE EDITING IN AOTEAROA - LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR POLICY MAKERS.
- Published in:
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2019, v. 50, n. 3, p. 515, doi. 10.26686/vuwlr.v50i3.5990
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Biotechnology Regulation, Round II.
- Published in:
- Environmental Quality Management, 2000, v. 9, n. 3, p. 111, doi. 10.1002/1520-6483(200021)9:3<111::AID-TQEM12>3.0.CO;2-8
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
EXCLUSION BY INCLUSION? ON DIFFICULTIES WITH REGARD TO AN EFFECTIVE ETHICAL ASSESSMENT OF PATENTING IN THE FIELD OF AGRICULTURAL BIO-TECHNOLOGY.
- Published in:
- Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 2006, v. 19, n. 6, p. 521, doi. 10.1007/s10806-006-9006-9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
A Review of: “Sheldon Krimsky and Peter Shorett (eds.), Rights and Liberties in the Biotech Age: Why We Need a Genetic Bill of Rights.”.
- Published in:
- 2006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
31
A Legal Perspective on Humanity, Personhood, and Species Boundaries.
- Published in:
- 2003
- Publication type:
- Opinion
32
Propertisation and Commercialisation: On Controlling the Uses of Human Biomaterials.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2014, v. 77, n. 5, p. 677, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12086
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Frankenfish … It's What's for Dinner: The FDA, Genetically Engineered Salmon, and the Flawed Regulation of Biotechnology.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2011, v. 45, n. 5, p. 83
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Modern Biotechnology--Potential Contribution and Challenges for Sustainable Food Production in Sub-Saharan Africa.
- Published in:
- Sustainability (2071-1050), 2011, v. 3, n. 6, p. 809, doi. 10.3390/su3060809
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
A Biotechnology Dilemma: Patent Your Inventions (if you can) or Keep Them Secret.
- Published in:
- Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2017, v. 23, n. 2, p. 74, doi. 10.5912/jcb797
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Analysing Patent Terms and Citations to Determine the Value of Gene Therapies.
- Published in:
- Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2017, v. 23, n. 2, p. 61, doi. 10.5912/jcb777
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Legal and Regulatory Update.
- Published in:
- Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2010, v. 16, n. 4, p. 348, doi. 10.1057/jcb.2010.14
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Biotechnology and the Law.
- Published in:
- 2008
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
39
Legal and regulatory update.
- Published in:
- Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2002, v. 8, n. 4, p. 350, doi. 10.5912/jcb452
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Legal and regulatory update.
- Published in:
- Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2001, v. 7, n. 3, p. 265, doi. 10.5912/jcb391
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Salmon with a Side of Genetic Modification: The FDA's Approval of AquAdvantage Salmon and Why the Precautionary Principle is Essential for Biotechnology Regulation.
- Published in:
- Seattle University Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 1, p. 311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
BUSCANDO ESTRATEGIAS DE REGULACIÓN DESDE EL MERCADO QUE RESPONDAN A LAS EXIGENCIAS DE LA BIOTECNOLOGÍA.
- Published in:
- Revista de Derecho Privado, 2012, n. 47, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Book Review: The Cunning of Rights: Law, Life, Biocultures.
- Published in:
- 2019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
44
GMOS AND THE CRISIS OF OBJECTIVITY: NATURE, SCIENCE AND THE CHALLENGE OF UNCERTAINTY.
- Published in:
- Social & Legal Studies, 2010, v. 19, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/0964663909346195
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Mexico sets a good precedent for biologics.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
46
Generic biotech.
- Published in:
- Journal of Generic Medicines, 2007, v. 4, n. 3, p. 159, doi. 10.1057/palgrave.jgm.4950070
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
PROTECTING THE SILENT THIRD PARTY: THE NEED FOR LEGISLATIVE REFORM WITH RESPECT TO INFORMED CONSENT AND RESEARCH ON HUMAN BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS.
- Published in:
- Charleston Law Review, 2012, v. 6, n. 4, p. 635
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
9. ISSUES IN THE SCIENCE-BASED REGULATION OF BIOTECHNOLOGY.
- Published in:
- Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health: Part A, 2001, v. 64, n. 1/2, p. 195, doi. 10.1080/15287390152539541
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Novelty of selection inventions: case law on ‘narrow’, ‘sufficiently far removed’ and ‘purposive selection’.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 7, p. 561, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt076
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Cone Morphology as a Diagnostic Attribute of Resonant Properties of Standing Spruce Wood.
- Published in:
- Wood Industry / Drvna Industrija, 2017, v. 68, n. 4, p. 333, doi. 10.5552/drind.2017.1731
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article