THE MIRANDA APP: METAPHOR AND MACHINE.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 935
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "BERGHUIS v. Thompkins"
Results: 15
1
2
All in All, Miranda Loses Another Brick From Its Wall: The U.S. Supreme Court Swings Its Hammer in Berghuis v. Thompkins, Dealing a Crushing Blow to the Right to Remain Silent [Berghuis v. Thompkins, 130 S. Ct. 2250 (2010)].
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
3
PROTECTING JUVENILES' RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT: DANGERS OF THE THOMPKINS RULE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REFORM.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2013, v. 34, n. 5, p. 2031
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
IS SILENCE STILL GOLDEN? THE IMPLICATIONS OF BERGHUIS V. THOMPKINS ON THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1179
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
SUPREME COURT--OCTOBER TERM 2009 FOREWORD: CONSERVATIVE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 3, p. 863
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
DO YOU BELIEVE IN MIRANDA? THE SUPREME COURT REVEALS ITS DOUBTS IN BERGHUIS V. THOMPKINS BY PARADOXICALLY RULING THAT SUSPECTS CAN ONLY INVOKE THEIR RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT BY SPEAKING.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2011, v. 21, n. 3, p. 407
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
What Does Silence Signify? Investigating the Rhetoric of Silence in Berghuis v. Thompkins.
- Published in:
- Western Journal of Communication, 2014, v. 78, n. 2, p. 175, doi. 10.1080/10570314.2013.835066
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
The Decision Zone: The New Stage of Interrogation Created by Berghuis v. Thompkins.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2012, v. 39, n. 2, p. 271
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Meditations on Post-Thompkins Invocations: A Model of "Clarity".
- Published in:
- New England Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 1, p. 217
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
You Have the Right to Remain Silent… Sort of: Berghuis v. Thompkins, the Social Costs of a Clear Statement Rule, and the Need for Amending the Miranda Warnings.
- Published in:
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 3, p. 723
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
The US Supreme Court revisits Miranda in a trilogy of cases and clarifies some of its principles but does not weaken Miranda 's core values.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2012, v. 25, n. 3, p. 229, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2012.705526
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
The Supreme Court revisits (and weakens) Miranda yet again: a critical examination of the 2009 term cases.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2012, v. 25, n. 3, p. 219, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2012.705523
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
SPEAKING TO REMAIN SILENT: IMPLIED WAIVERS AND THE RIGHT TO SILENCE AFTER BERGHUIS.
- Published in:
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2012, v. 73, n. 3, p. 587, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2012.228
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
BERGHUIS V. THOMPKINS: THE SUPREME COURT'S "NEW" TAKE ON IN VOCATION AND WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT.
- Published in:
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 221
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
MIRANDA'S HIDDEN RIGHT.
- Published in:
- Alabama Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 3, p. 535
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article