AN IMPLAUSIBLE STANDARD FOR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 112, n. 2, p. 275
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "BELL Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly"
Results: 132
1
2
PLEADING WITH CONGRESS TO RESIST THE URGE TO OVERRULE TWOMBLY AND IQBAL.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2010, v. 109, n. 3, p. 415
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
UNDERSTANDING PLEADING DOCTRINE.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2009, v. 108, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Judge’s gate-keeping power and deterrence of negligent acts: an economic analysis of Twombly and Iqbal.
- Published in:
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 2018, v. 46, n. 1, p. 39, doi. 10.1007/s10657-018-9590-y
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
PATENT LITIGATION REFORM: THE COURTS, CONGRESS, AND THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
6
Is Evidence Obsolete?
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2016, v. 36, n. 3, p. 529
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Some Remarks on the Importance of Evidence Outside of Trials.
- Published in:
- Review of Litigation, 2016, v. 36, n. 3, p. 443
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
"Only Procedural": Thoughts on the Substantive Law Dimensions of Preliminary Procedural Decisions in Employment Discrimination Cases.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
9
The Jury (or More Accurately the Judge) Is Still Out for Civil Rights and Employment Cases Post-Iqbal.
- Published in:
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 719
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Introduction: Trial by Jury or Trial by Motion? Summary Judgment, Iqbal, and Employment Discrimination.
- Published in:
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 659
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
What the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Forms Say About Twombly and Iqbal: Implications of the Forms on the Supreme Court's Standard.
- Published in:
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2011, v. 41, n. 3, p. 501
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Down Go the Forms: The Abrogation of Rule 84 and the Official Forms of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 1, p. 325
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Fighting Corruption of the Historical Record: Nazi-Looted Art Litigation.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2011, p. 75
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
ACCESS-TO-JUSTICE V. EFFICIENCY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF SETTLEMENT RATES AFTER TWOMBLY & IQBAL.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 1, p. 357
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
WHITHER NOTICE PLEADING?: PLEADING PRACTICE IN THE DAYS BEFORE TWOMBLY.
- Published in:
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2014, v. 39, n. 1, p. 23
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO SUCCEED ON THE MERITS: THE EEOC AND RULE 12(b)(6).
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2018, v. 59, n. 3, p. 1097
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
PLAUSIBILITY BEYOND THE COMPLAINT.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2012, v. 53, n. 3, p. 987
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
THE PLATNTIFF NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLE: PLEADING COMPLEX LITIGATION IN THE ERA OF TWOMBLY AND IQBAL.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2010, v. 51, n. 6, p. 1997
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Twiqbal In Context.
- Published in:
- Journal of Legal Education, 2016, v. 65, n. 4, p. 744
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER CLAIMS BY STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL: THE CASE FOR REMOVAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PARENS PATRIAE SUITS AS "MASS ACTIONS™ UNDER THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT OF 2005.
- Published in:
- Health Law & Policy, 2014, v. 7, n. 2, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Procedural Retrenchment and the States.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 2, p. 411, doi. 10.15779/Z38QV3C40V
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
THE TOLL OF BELL ATLANTIC CORP. V. TWOMBLY: AN ARGUMENT FOR TAKING THE EDGE OFF THE ADVANTAGE GIVEN DEFENDANTS.
- Published in:
- Vermont Law Review, 2008, v. 33, n. 2, p. 323
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Amended Rules, Amended Pleadings: How the Abrogation of Form 18 Politicized Direct Infringement Patent Pleading.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2019, v. 21, n. 3, p. 737
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Plausibly Willful-Tightening Pleading Standards in FACTA Credit Card Receipt Litigation Where Only an Expiration Date Is Present.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1314
- Publication type:
- Article
25
The Plausibility Standard as a Double-edged Sword: The Application of Twombly and Iqbal to Affirmative Defenses.
- Published in:
- Florida Bar Journal, 2010, v. 84, n. 6, p. 77
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
IQBAL'S RETRO REVOLUTION.
- Published in:
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 5, p. 937
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Pleading and Access to Civil Justice: A Response to Twiqbal Apologists.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2013, v. 60, n. 6, p. 1710
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Teaching Twombly and Iqbal: Elements Analysis and the Ghost of Charles Clark.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2013, v. 60, n. 6, p. 1740
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Complexity, the Generation of Legal Knowledge, and the Future of Litigation.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2013, v. 60, n. 6, p. 1384
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
PLAINTIPHOBIA IN THE SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
31
CORRELATION PLAUSIBILITY: A FRAMEWORK FOR FAIRNESS AND PREDICTABILITY IN PLEADING PRACTICE AFTER TWOMBLY AND IQBAL.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2010, v. 44, n. 1, p. 141
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
TAMING TWOMBLY, EVEN AFTER IQBAL.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2010, v. 158, n. 2, p. 473
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
SILLY JURIST, TWIQBAL'S FOR CLAIMS: PLEADING JURISDICTION AFTER TWOMBLY AND IQBAL.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1867
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Election Law Pleading.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1966
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Multijurisdictional M&A Litigation.
- Published in:
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 291
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
I HAVE FEDERAL PLEADING ALL FIGURED OUT.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2011, v. 61, n. 2, p. 453
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
The Rise and Fall of Plausibility Pleading?
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 2, p. 333
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Rulemaking in the Age of Twombly and Iqbal.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 5, p. 1483
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
PLEADING REQUIREMENTS FOR CLAIMS BY CONTRACTORS AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT: APPLYING TWOMBLY AND IQBAL AFTER THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT'S DECISION IN TODD CONSTRUCTION, L.P.
- Published in:
- Public Contract Law Journal, 2012, v. 42, n. 1, p. 203
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
THE FRAUDULENT JOINDER PREVENTION ACT OF 2016: MOVING THE LAW IN THE WRONG DIRECTION.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 1, p. 213
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
THE RISE OF THE COMMON LAW OF FEDERAL PLEADING: IQBAL, TWOMBLY, AND THE APPLICATION OF JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2012, v. 56, n. 5, p. 857
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
I Just Love A Good Debate! Twombly and Iqbal Five Years Later.
- Published in:
- Franchise Law Journal, 2013, v. 33, n. 1, p. 33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
New Pleading Standards in Federal Court: Will They Impact Franchise Cases?
- Published in:
- Franchise Law Journal, 2009, v. 29, n. 2, p. 81
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Federal pleading standards and the business judgment rule after Twombly and Iqbal.
- Published in:
- Journal of Securities Law, Regulation & Compliance, 2010, v. 3, n. 4, p. 350
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Not the Same Old Story: Using Narrative Theory to Understand and Overcome the Plausibility Pleading Standard.
- Published in:
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2014, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Diverging Paths: The Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision to Reject the "Plausibility" Pleading Standard in Walsh v. U.S. Bank.
- Published in:
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2015, v. 41, n. 5, p. 1654
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
The Dynamic Allocation of Burden Doctrine as a Mitigation of the Undesirable Effects of Iqbal's Pleading Standard.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 185
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
PLEADING IN OHIO AFTER BELL ATLANTIC V TWOMBLY AND ASHCROFT V IQBAL: WHY OHIO SHOULDN'T "NOTICE" A CHANGE.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2010, v. 58, n. 2, p. 495
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
REDUCING THE COST AND INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF RESOLVING COMMERCIAL DISPUTES.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2018, v. 40, n. 1, p. 187
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
THE NARRATIVE OF COSTS, THE COST OF NARRATIVE.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2018, v. 40, n. 1, p. 121
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article