Works matching DE "BATSON v. Kentucky"
1
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 4, p. 1075
- Article
2
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2011, v. 42, n. 2, p. 337
- WATTS, MIKAL C.;
- JEFFCOTT, EMILY C.
- Article
3
- Alabama Law Review, 2022, v. 73, n. 4, p. 753
- Article
4
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 3, p. 719
- Article
5
- Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2010, v. 19, n. 2, p. 193
- Article
6
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2021, v. 52, n. 1, p. 89
- Article
7
- Houston Law Review, 2022, v. 59, n. 3, p. 715
- Article
8
- Florida Bar Journal, 2014, v. 88, n. 9, p. 33
- Article
9
- Yale Law & Policy Review, 2016, v. 34, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
10
- Michigan Law Review, 2010, v. 108, n. 7, p. 1283
- Article
11
- California Law Review, 2020, v. 108, n. 1, p. 233, doi. 10.15779/Z385Q4RM61
- Article
12
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 6, p. 2067, doi. 10.15779/Z38PC2T88P
- Article
13
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2018, v. 62, n. 2, p. 397
- Article
14
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 1875
- Article
15
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, p. 1867
- Article
16
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1713
- Article
19
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1635
- Article
20
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1613
- Article
21
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1585
- Article
22
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1561
- Article
24
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1467
- Article
25
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1425
- Baldus, David C.;
- Grosso, Catherine M.;
- Dunham, Robert;
- Woodworth, George;
- Newell, Richard
- Article
27
- Iowa Law Review, 2008, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1687
- Article
28
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 2, p. 437
- Article
29
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2006, v. 56, n. 3, p. 769
- Article
30
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2012, v. 68, n. 4, p. 218
- Article
31
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2021, v. 39, n. 4, p. 485
- Article
32
- Utah Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 2, p. 289
- Article
33
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2021, v. 82, n. 2, p. 201
- Article
34
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2021, v. 82, n. 1, p. 201
- Article
35
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 3, p. 725
- Article
36
- Stanford Law Review, 2014, v. 66, n. 5, p. 1159
- Article
37
- Stanford Law Review, 2012, v. 64, n. 3, p. 727
- Article
38
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1006
- Article
39
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2018, v. 17, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgx016
- Article
40
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2019, v. 84, n. 2, p. 671
- Article
41
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2018, v. 84, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
42
- Advocate (05154987), 2018, v. 61, n. 5, p. 42
- Article
43
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 4, p. 1681
- Article
44
- North Carolina Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 6, p. 1957
- POLLITT, DANIEL R.;
- WARREN, BRITTANY P.
- Article
45
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2021, v. 31, n. 3, p. 289
- Article
46
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2014, v. 49, n. 4, p. 1107
- Article
47
- Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 12, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
48
- Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2012, v. 10, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
49
- Yale Law Journal, 2019, v. 128, n. 8, p. 2356
- Article
50
- Yale Law Journal, 2016, v. 125, n. 8, p. 2535
- Article