A 'bright-line' rule: You will pay for violating bankruptcy stay.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2022, v. 79, n. 8, p. 14
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "AUTOMATIC stays in bankruptcy"
Results: 37
1
2
CONNECTING KAWAAUHAU V. GEIGER TO 11 U.S.C.§ 362(K): CONSIDERING THE "WILLFUL"REQUIREMENT FOR AUTOMATIC STAYENFORCEMENT THROUGH IRS V. MURPHY.
- Published in:
- New York University Journal of Law & Business, 2018, v. 15, n. 1, p. 101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
FIGHTING FOR THE DEBTOR'S SOUL: REGULATING RELIGIOUS COMMERCIAL CONDUCT.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2011, v. 19, n. 1, p. 157
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
The bankrupt student-debtor v. The educational institution: The struggle for academic...
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1995, v. 45, n. 3, p. 957
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Won't You Stay a Little Longer? Rejecting the Majority Interpretation of Bankruptcy Code § 362(c)(3)(A).
- Published in:
- American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 2012, v. 86, n. 3, p. 407
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
The Inefficacy of the New Eviction Exceptions to the Automatic Stay.
- Published in:
- American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 2006, v. 80, n. 1, p. 125
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
The Not-So-Automatic Stay: Legislative Changes to the Automatic Stay in a Case Filed by or against an Individual Debtor.
- Published in:
- American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 2005, v. 79, n. 3, p. 749
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
SCHOPPE V. COMMISSIONER: THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT SPLIT REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY PROVISION OF 11 U.S.C. § 362(A)(1) TO APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
BANKRUPTCY.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2010, v. 67, n. 11, p. 36
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
The Top Ten Things the Family Law Attorney Should Know About the Recent Changes in Bankruptcy Law.
- Published in:
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2011, v. 67, n. 3, p. 170
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
BAPCPA AND THE NEW PROVISIONS RELATING TO SMALL BUSINESSES.
- Published in:
- Widener Law Journal, 2006, v. 15, n. 3, p. 585
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Bankruptcy and Health Insurance Proceeds: Why Health Care Providers Should Not Be Subject to the Automatic Stay Provision.
- Published in:
- Duquesne Law Review, 2015, v. 53, n. 1, p. 279
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
The Fox vs. the Hedgehog: Why Purely Emotional Damages Should Be Recoverable Under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h).
- Published in:
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 2006, v. 4, n. 3, p. 497
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
NextWave: The Double Edged Sword.
- Published in:
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 2004, v. 2, n. 3, p. 593
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
The Facts & Fiction of Bankruptcy Reform.
- Published in:
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 2003, v. 1, n. 3, p. 361
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Emotional Distress Damages: Should They Be Permitted Under the Bankruptcy Code for a Willful Violation of the Stay.
- Published in:
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 2003, v. 1, n. 3, p. 339
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
The Secured Creditor's Complaint: Relief from the Automatic Stays in Bankruptcy Proceedings.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1977, v. 65, n. 6, p. 1216, doi. 10.2307/3480072
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
When the Defendant Runs to Bankruptcy Court: Next Steps for the Plaintiff's Employment Lawyer.
- Published in:
- ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 2013, v. 28, n. 3, p. 383
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
BANKRUPTCY RULES AND COALITIONAL MANIPULATION.
- Published in:
- International Game Theory Review, 2007, v. 9, n. 1, p. 105, doi. 10.1142/S0219198907001308
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Legal Risks of Servicer Bankruptcy or Insolvency in Securitization Transactions.
- Published in:
- Journal of Structured Finance, 2005, v. 11, n. 2, p. 28, doi. 10.3905/jsf.2005.570543
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
BANKRUPTCY SECTION 108 (c): IS THE 'SUSPENSION' QUESTION STILL IN SUSPENSION?
- Published in:
- Commercial Law Journal, 2001, v. 106, n. 4, p. 395
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
A review of current cases and developing trends considering the efficacy of section 362 automatic stay waivers in commercial mortgages,...or `What do you have to lose'?
- Published in:
- Commercial Law Journal, 1998, v. 103, n. 3, p. 271
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Should It Stay or Should It Go: The Clash of Canons over Termination of the Automatic Stay for Repeat Filers.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2022, v. 75, n. 2, p. 615
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
SITUATING REIMPOSITION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY WITHIN THE FEDERAL COMMON LAW OF BANKRUPTCY.
- Published in:
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2016, v. 47, n. 2, p. 447
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Shielding Third Parties in Bankruptcy: Extensions of the §362 Automatic Stay and Imposing §105 Injunctions Under the Bankruptcy Code.
- Published in:
- Florida Bar Journal, 2022, v. 96, n. 5, p. 26
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Dicing it Up: Does a Sliver of the Automatic Stay Remain for Repeat Debtors?
- Published in:
- Florida Bar Journal, 2019, v. 93, n. 2, p. 43
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Bankruptcy Is a Game Changer for Homeowner Associations.
- Published in:
- Florida Bar Journal, 2016, v. 90, n. 6, p. 96
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
The Impact of a Bankruptcy Filing on a Pending Appellate Proceeding.
- Published in:
- Florida Bar Journal, 2013, v. 87, n. 3, p. 37
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
WHY WRIGHT WAS WRONG: HOW THE THIRD CIRCUIT MISINTERPRETED THE BANKRUPTCY CODE . . . AGAIN.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2013, v. 113, n. 8, p. 2191
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Recurring Issues in the Prosecution of Employment Claims in a Bankruptcy.
- Published in:
- Advocate (05154987), 2015, v. 58, n. 11/12, p. 40
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
PUTTING WITH A PITCHING WEDGE: INDISCRIMINATING TERMINATION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY.
- Published in:
- Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2022, v. 38, n. 2, p. 225
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
FIGHTING FINALITY AND DEBTOR WASTE IN CHAPTER 13 POSTCONFIRMATION COLLATERAL SURRENDER.
- Published in:
- Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2010, v. 27, n. 1, p. 169
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
DOWN AND OUT AND NOW KICKED OUT: RESIDENTIAL LEASE EVICTIONS AND THE AUTOMATIC STAY.
- Published in:
- Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2007, v. 23, n. 2, p. 585
- Publication type:
- Article
34
COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL AND THE ROOKER-FELDMAN DOCTRINE: THE PROBLEMATIC EFFECT THESE PRECLUSION AND JURISDICTIONAL PRINCIPLES HAVE ON BANKRUPTCY LAW.
- Published in:
- Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2005, v. 21, n. 2, p. 579
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
UPDATE ON CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY: CITY OF CHICAGO V. FULTON.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2022, v. 55, n. 3, p. 501
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
A PRO DEBTOR AND MAJORITY APPROACH TO THE "AUTOMATIC STAY" PROVISION OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE--IN RE COWEN INCORRECTLY DECIDED.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2018, v. 59, n. 9, p. 537
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Re-Charting the Remedial Course for Section 11(b) Violations Post-Jordan.
- Published in:
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 2019, v. 56, n. 2, p. 436
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article