Works matching DE "ATTITUDES of U.S. Supreme Court justices"
1
- Labor Law Journal, 2014, v. 65, n. 3, p. 149
- Article
3
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1052
- Article
5
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 3, p. 605
- Article
6
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2019, v. 47, p. 59, doi. 10.1177/1073110519857319
- Article
7
- Texas Law Review, 2013, v. 91, n. 7, p. 1711
- Article
8
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2015, v. 30, n. 3, p. 293
- Unah, Isaac;
- Rosano, Kristen;
- Milam, K. Dawn
- Article
9
- Maryland Law Review, 2014, v. 74, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
13
- New York Law School Law Review, 2022, v. 66, n. 1, p. 11
- Article
15
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2014, v. 15, n. 3, p. 409, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2014.336
- Article
19
- Florida Bar Journal, 2015, v. 88, n. 9, p. 30
- Article
20
- 2012
- Stevens, John Paul;
- Greenhouse, Linda
- Interview
21
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 167
- Article
22
- Michigan Law Review, 2014, v. 113, n. 2, p. 179
- Article
23
- California Law Review, 2012, v. 100, n. 5, p. 1101
- Article
24
- Pennsylvania Magazine of History & Biography, 2016, v. 140, n. 2, p. 129, doi. 10.5215/pennmaghistbio.140.2.0129
- Article
25
- Public Choice, 2015, v. 163, n. 1/2, p. 167, doi. 10.1007/s11127-014-0216-9
- Article
26
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 4, p. 817
- Bennett, Thomas B.;
- Friedman, Barry;
- Martin, Andrew D.;
- Smelcer, Susan Navarro
- Article
28
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 769
- Article
29
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 2, p. 203
- Article
30
- Akron Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1
- Article
31
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 4, p. 1689
- Article
32
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2012, v. 69, n. 3, p. 1535
- Article
33
- Denver University Law Review, 2014, v. 91, n. 2, p. 221
- SAWYER III, LOGAN EVERETT
- Article
34
- Denver University Law Review, 2014, v. 91, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
35
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 1, p. 197
- Article
36
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
37
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 3, p. 971
- Article
38
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
39
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
42
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 371
- Article
44
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 457
- Article
45
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
46
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 6, p. 1705
- Article
48
- Hofstra Law Review, 2015, v. 43, n. 3, p. 639
- Article
49
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 5, p. 919
- Article
50
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 4, p. 871
- Article