AN IMPLAUSIBLE STANDARD FOR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 112, n. 2, p. 275
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "ASHCROFT v. Iqbal"
Results: 136
1
2
PLEADING WITH CONGRESS TO RESIST THE URGE TO OVERRULE TWOMBLY AND IQBAL.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2010, v. 109, n. 3, p. 415
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
PATENT LITIGATION REFORM: THE COURTS, CONGRESS, AND THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
4
The Roberts Court and the Civil Procedure Revival.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
5
"Only Procedural": Thoughts on the Substantive Law Dimensions of Preliminary Procedural Decisions in Employment Discrimination Cases.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
6
The Jury (or More Accurately the Judge) Is Still Out for Civil Rights and Employment Cases Post-Iqbal.
- Published in:
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 719
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Introduction: Trial by Jury or Trial by Motion? Summary Judgment, Iqbal, and Employment Discrimination.
- Published in:
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 659
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
BEYOND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: WHEN THE SUPREME COURT IS NO LONGER A COURT.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2011, v. 14, n. 1, p. 161
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
What the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Forms Say About Twombly and Iqbal: Implications of the Forms on the Supreme Court's Standard.
- Published in:
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2011, v. 41, n. 3, p. 501
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Down Go the Forms: The Abrogation of Rule 84 and the Official Forms of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 1, p. 325
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Fighting Corruption of the Historical Record: Nazi-Looted Art Litigation.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2011, p. 75
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
ACCESS-TO-JUSTICE V. EFFICIENCY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF SETTLEMENT RATES AFTER TWOMBLY & IQBAL.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 1, p. 357
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
WHITHER NOTICE PLEADING?: PLEADING PRACTICE IN THE DAYS BEFORE TWOMBLY.
- Published in:
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2014, v. 39, n. 1, p. 23
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO SUCCEED ON THE MERITS: THE EEOC AND RULE 12(b)(6).
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2018, v. 59, n. 3, p. 1097
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
PLAUSIBILITY BEYOND THE COMPLAINT.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2012, v. 53, n. 3, p. 987
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
PLAUSIBLY PLEADING EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2011, v. 52, n. 5, p. 1613
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
THE PLATNTIFF NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLE: PLEADING COMPLEX LITIGATION IN THE ERA OF TWOMBLY AND IQBAL.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2010, v. 51, n. 6, p. 1997
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER CLAIMS BY STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL: THE CASE FOR REMOVAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL PARENS PATRIAE SUITS AS "MASS ACTIONS™ UNDER THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT OF 2005.
- Published in:
- Health Law & Policy, 2014, v. 7, n. 2, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Procedural Retrenchment and the States.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 2, p. 411, doi. 10.15779/Z38QV3C40V
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Pleading for Justice: An Analysis of Pleading Sufficiency and Class Action Certification as Applied to Vulnerable Populations in Willis v. City of Seattle.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2021, v. 99, n. 3, p. 821
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Plausibly Willful-Tightening Pleading Standards in FACTA Credit Card Receipt Litigation Where Only an Expiration Date Is Present.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1314
- Publication type:
- Article
22
IQBAL'S RETRO REVOLUTION.
- Published in:
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 5, p. 937
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
PLAINTIPHOBIA IN THE SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
24
CORRELATION PLAUSIBILITY: A FRAMEWORK FOR FAIRNESS AND PREDICTABILITY IN PLEADING PRACTICE AFTER TWOMBLY AND IQBAL.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2010, v. 44, n. 1, p. 141
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
SILLY JURIST, TWIQBAL'S FOR CLAIMS: PLEADING JURISDICTION AFTER TWOMBLY AND IQBAL.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1867
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Election Law Pleading.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 6, p. 1966
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
The Impact of Ashcroft v. Iqbal on Pleading.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2011, v. 43, n. 2, p. 559
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Supervisory Liability After Iqbal: Misunderstood But Not Misnamed.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2011, v. 43, n. 2, p. 541
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
The Many Faces of Iqbal.
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2011, v. 43, n. 2, p. 529
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Multijurisdictional M&A Litigation.
- Published in:
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 291
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
I HAVE FEDERAL PLEADING ALL FIGURED OUT.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2011, v. 61, n. 2, p. 453
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Rulemaking in the Age of Twombly and Iqbal.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 5, p. 1483
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
PLEADING REQUIREMENTS FOR CLAIMS BY CONTRACTORS AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT: APPLYING TWOMBLY AND IQBAL AFTER THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT'S DECISION IN TODD CONSTRUCTION, L.P.
- Published in:
- Public Contract Law Journal, 2012, v. 42, n. 1, p. 203
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
THE FRAUDULENT JOINDER PREVENTION ACT OF 2016: MOVING THE LAW IN THE WRONG DIRECTION.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 1, p. 213
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
THE RISE OF THE COMMON LAW OF FEDERAL PLEADING: IQBAL, TWOMBLY, AND THE APPLICATION OF JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2012, v. 56, n. 5, p. 857
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
I Just Love A Good Debate! Twombly and Iqbal Five Years Later.
- Published in:
- Franchise Law Journal, 2013, v. 33, n. 1, p. 33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Federal pleading standards and the business judgment rule after Twombly and Iqbal.
- Published in:
- Journal of Securities Law, Regulation & Compliance, 2010, v. 3, n. 4, p. 350
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Not the Same Old Story: Using Narrative Theory to Understand and Overcome the Plausibility Pleading Standard.
- Published in:
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2014, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Diverging Paths: The Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision to Reject the "Plausibility" Pleading Standard in Walsh v. U.S. Bank.
- Published in:
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2015, v. 41, n. 5, p. 1654
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
The Dynamic Allocation of Burden Doctrine as a Mitigation of the Undesirable Effects of Iqbal's Pleading Standard.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 185
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
PLEADING IN OHIO AFTER BELL ATLANTIC V TWOMBLY AND ASHCROFT V IQBAL: WHY OHIO SHOULDN'T "NOTICE" A CHANGE.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2010, v. 58, n. 2, p. 495
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
PLEADING CONDITIONS OF THE MIND UNDER RULE 9(b): REPAIRING THE DAMAGE WROUGHT BY IQBAL.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2020, v. 41, n. 3, p. 1015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
SUPERVISORY LIABILITY AND ASHCROFT V. IQBAL.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2020, v. 41, n. 3, p. 945
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
JANUS-FACED RULEMAKING.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2020, v. 41, n. 3, p. 921
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
THE FALLACY OF LIBERAL DISCOVERY: LITIGATING EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES IN THE E-DISCOVERY AGE.
- Published in:
- Capital University Law Review, 2016, v. 44, n. 4, p. 693
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
The Failed Legacy of Absolute Immunity Under Imbler: Providing a Compromise Approach to Claims of Prosecutorial Misconduct.
- Published in:
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2012, v. 48, n. 2, p. 219
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Pleadings Plain or Plausible.
- Published in:
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2014, v. 71, n. 9, p. 24
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Plausible Defenses: Historical, Plain Meaning, and Public Policy Arguments for Applying Iqbal and Twombly to Affirmative Defenses.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 5, p. 1828
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
How Qualified Immunity Fails.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 127, n. 1, p. 2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Locking the Doors to Discovery? Assessing the Effects of Twombly and Iqbal on Access to Discovery.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 121, n. 8, p. 2270
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article